An approach to the detection of pain from autonomic and cortical correlates

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
{"title":"An approach to the detection of pain from autonomic and cortical correlates","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.07.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the value of combining brain and autonomic measures to discriminate the subjective perception of pain from other sensory-cognitive activations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>20 healthy individuals received 2 types of tonic painful stimulation delivered to the hand: electrical stimuli and immersion in 10 Celsius degree (°C) water, which were contrasted with non-painful immersion in 15 °C water, and stressful cognitive testing. High-density electroencephalography (EEG) and autonomic measures (pupillary, electrodermal and cardiovascular) were continuously recorded, and the accuracy of pain detection based on combinations of electrophysiological features was assessed using machine learning procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Painful stimuli induced a significant decrease in contralateral EEG alpha power. Cardiac, electrodermal and pupillary reactivities occurred in both painful and stressful conditions. Classification models, trained on leave-one-out cross-validation folds, showed low accuracy (61–73%) of cortical and autonomic features taken independently, while their combination significantly improved accuracy to 93% in individual reports.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Changes in cortical oscillations reflecting somatosensory salience and autonomic changes reflecting arousal can be triggered by many activating signals other than pain; conversely, the simultaneous occurrence of somatosensory activation plus strong autonomic arousal has great probability of reflecting pain uniquely.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Combining changes in cortical and autonomic reactivities appears critical to derive accurate indexes of acute pain perception.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724002165","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the value of combining brain and autonomic measures to discriminate the subjective perception of pain from other sensory-cognitive activations.

Methods

20 healthy individuals received 2 types of tonic painful stimulation delivered to the hand: electrical stimuli and immersion in 10 Celsius degree (°C) water, which were contrasted with non-painful immersion in 15 °C water, and stressful cognitive testing. High-density electroencephalography (EEG) and autonomic measures (pupillary, electrodermal and cardiovascular) were continuously recorded, and the accuracy of pain detection based on combinations of electrophysiological features was assessed using machine learning procedures.

Results

Painful stimuli induced a significant decrease in contralateral EEG alpha power. Cardiac, electrodermal and pupillary reactivities occurred in both painful and stressful conditions. Classification models, trained on leave-one-out cross-validation folds, showed low accuracy (61–73%) of cortical and autonomic features taken independently, while their combination significantly improved accuracy to 93% in individual reports.

Conclusions

Changes in cortical oscillations reflecting somatosensory salience and autonomic changes reflecting arousal can be triggered by many activating signals other than pain; conversely, the simultaneous occurrence of somatosensory activation plus strong autonomic arousal has great probability of reflecting pain uniquely.

Significance

Combining changes in cortical and autonomic reactivities appears critical to derive accurate indexes of acute pain perception.

从自律神经和大脑皮层相关因素检测疼痛的方法
方法 20 名健康人的手部接受了两种类型的强直性疼痛刺激:电刺激和浸泡在 10 摄氏度 (°C) 的水中,这与浸泡在 15 摄氏度水中的非疼痛刺激和压力认知测试形成了鲜明对比。连续记录高密度脑电图(EEG)和自律神经测量(瞳孔、电皮和心血管),并使用机器学习程序评估基于电生理特征组合的疼痛检测的准确性。在疼痛和应激条件下都会出现心脏、皮肤和瞳孔反应。在留一交叉验证褶皱上训练的分类模型显示,皮层和自律神经特征单独使用的准确率较低(61%-73%),而两者结合使用则可显著提高准确率,在单个报告中达到 93%。结论反映躯体感觉显著性的皮层振荡变化和反映唤醒的自律神经变化可由疼痛以外的许多激活信号触发;相反,同时出现躯体感觉激活和强烈的自律神经唤醒很有可能是对疼痛的唯一反映。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neurophysiology
Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
6.40%
发文量
932
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology. Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信