Reading skill profiles of dysfluent readers in grades 2 and 3

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
David A. Klingbeil , Ethan R. Van Norman , Peter M. Nelson , David C. Parker , Patrick J. Kaiser , Monica L. Vidal , Angelos Ntais , Zhuanghan Dong , Kirsten Truman
{"title":"Reading skill profiles of dysfluent readers in grades 2 and 3","authors":"David A. Klingbeil ,&nbsp;Ethan R. Van Norman ,&nbsp;Peter M. Nelson ,&nbsp;David C. Parker ,&nbsp;Patrick J. Kaiser ,&nbsp;Monica L. Vidal ,&nbsp;Angelos Ntais ,&nbsp;Zhuanghan Dong ,&nbsp;Kirsten Truman","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Text reading fluency (TRF) is a common reading intervention target in second and third grade. TRF requires the integration of several skills that result in several pathways to dysfluent reading. However, when applying the drill-down approach to intervention targeting, practitioners are guided to consider students' rate and accuracy when reading connected text after ruling out decoding difficulties. A question remains whether students' reading rate and accuracy alone is sensitive to differences in the underlying skills that promote TRF. We used latent profile analysis to investigate whether different profiles of component reading skills could be identified among second- (<em>n</em> = 127) and third-grade (<em>n</em> = 170) students who were referred for an intervention targeting TRF. Most students were identified as white (56%) and students were predominately English speakers (87%). At the beginning of the intervention, we measured participants' skills in listening comprehension, reading comprehension, reading vocabulary, word reading efficiency, and decoding efficiency. Four profiles emerged in both grades with similar patterns in terms of the component skills influencing TRF. Students in two of the profiles demonstrated relative strengths in word reading or reading comprehension with their other skills near the sample average. A third profile approximated the sample average across all component skills whereas the fourth profile was below the sample average in all measured skills. However, some of the empirically derived profiles did not differ in terms of students' average reading rate. For example, the average words read correct per minute did not significantly differ between students with relative strengths in comprehension and students with relative strengths with word reading. Our results suggest that differences in students' text reading rate and accuracy may not always capture potentially relevant differences in the skills that influence TRF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440524000761","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Text reading fluency (TRF) is a common reading intervention target in second and third grade. TRF requires the integration of several skills that result in several pathways to dysfluent reading. However, when applying the drill-down approach to intervention targeting, practitioners are guided to consider students' rate and accuracy when reading connected text after ruling out decoding difficulties. A question remains whether students' reading rate and accuracy alone is sensitive to differences in the underlying skills that promote TRF. We used latent profile analysis to investigate whether different profiles of component reading skills could be identified among second- (n = 127) and third-grade (n = 170) students who were referred for an intervention targeting TRF. Most students were identified as white (56%) and students were predominately English speakers (87%). At the beginning of the intervention, we measured participants' skills in listening comprehension, reading comprehension, reading vocabulary, word reading efficiency, and decoding efficiency. Four profiles emerged in both grades with similar patterns in terms of the component skills influencing TRF. Students in two of the profiles demonstrated relative strengths in word reading or reading comprehension with their other skills near the sample average. A third profile approximated the sample average across all component skills whereas the fourth profile was below the sample average in all measured skills. However, some of the empirically derived profiles did not differ in terms of students' average reading rate. For example, the average words read correct per minute did not significantly differ between students with relative strengths in comprehension and students with relative strengths with word reading. Our results suggest that differences in students' text reading rate and accuracy may not always capture potentially relevant differences in the skills that influence TRF.

二、三年级语障读者的阅读技能概况
文本阅读流畅性(TRF)是二、三年级常见的阅读干预目标。文本阅读流畅性需要整合多种技能,这些技能会导致多种途径的阅读障碍。然而,在采用 "向下钻研 "的方法确定干预目标时,教师会在排除解码困难后,考虑学生阅读连贯文本的速度和准确性。一个问题是,学生的阅读速度和准确性是否能反映出促进TRF的潜在技能的差异。我们使用潜在特征分析来研究是否可以在二年级(n=127)和三年级(n=170)的学生中发现不同的阅读技能特征,这些学生被推荐接受针对TRF的干预。大多数学生被认定为白人(56%),学生主要讲英语(87%)。在干预开始时,我们测量了参与者的听力理解、阅读理解、阅读词汇、单词阅读效率和解码效率。两个年级的学生都出现了四种情况,在影响 TRF 的组成技能方面有着相似的模式。其中两类学生在单词阅读或阅读理解方面表现出相对优势,其他技能接近样本平均水平。第三种情况的学生在所有技能方面都接近样本平均水平,而第四种情况的学生在所有技能方面都低于样本平均水平。然而,根据经验得出的一些情况在学生的平均阅读率方面并无差异。例如,理解能力相对较强的学生与单词阅读能力相对较强的学生在平均每分钟正确阅读的单词数上没有明显差异。我们的研究结果表明,学生文本阅读速度和准确率的差异可能并不总能反映影响 TRF 的技能方面的潜在相关差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of School Psychology
Journal of School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信