Aspects of development: Voices from predisplacement site in Eastern India

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Daipayan Ghosh
{"title":"Aspects of development: Voices from predisplacement site in Eastern India","authors":"Daipayan Ghosh","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present research paper is an ethnographic account of the travails and resistance of an <em>adivasi</em> (native) community of India called Santhals. These adivasis are facing the threat of eviction due to a planned coal mining in the area, located in West Bengal, a state in the eastern part of India. Amid the ongoing protest against coal mines, many families are ready to give up their land for the project. Even differences in opinion are common among the leaders of those protest groups. These differences in perception about a coal mine project are the central theme of this paper. Drawing from it the paper is going to scrutinize the grand terms like ‘Affected Persons’, used in ‘National Mineral Policy 2019’ and ‘Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act (2013)’, and ‘Local Community’ to show that any generalization or universalization of those various perceptions suppress the real needs of the people since they get affected in multiple ways. Further, this paper regards ‘development’ as ‘<em>pharmakon</em>’ for its dual nature, since people in the same community perceive it as poison; in contrast, for others, it is the remedy for their poverty. Tracing from all the varying voices, the paper finally argues for finding ‘significant others’, who are significantly excluded from decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 101517"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X24001138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present research paper is an ethnographic account of the travails and resistance of an adivasi (native) community of India called Santhals. These adivasis are facing the threat of eviction due to a planned coal mining in the area, located in West Bengal, a state in the eastern part of India. Amid the ongoing protest against coal mines, many families are ready to give up their land for the project. Even differences in opinion are common among the leaders of those protest groups. These differences in perception about a coal mine project are the central theme of this paper. Drawing from it the paper is going to scrutinize the grand terms like ‘Affected Persons’, used in ‘National Mineral Policy 2019’ and ‘Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act (2013)’, and ‘Local Community’ to show that any generalization or universalization of those various perceptions suppress the real needs of the people since they get affected in multiple ways. Further, this paper regards ‘development’ as ‘pharmakon’ for its dual nature, since people in the same community perceive it as poison; in contrast, for others, it is the remedy for their poverty. Tracing from all the varying voices, the paper finally argues for finding ‘significant others’, who are significantly excluded from decision-making.

发展的各个方面:来自印度东部流离失所前遗址的声音
本研究论文以人种学的方式描述了印度一个名为桑塔尔的阿迪瓦西(土著)社区的苦难和反抗。该地区位于印度东部的西孟加拉邦,由于计划开采煤矿,这些阿迪瓦西人正面临着被驱逐的威胁。在持续不断的反对煤矿开采的抗议活动中,许多家庭都准备放弃自己的土地来参与该项目。甚至在这些抗议团体的领导人之间也经常出现意见分歧。这些对煤矿项目的不同看法正是本文的中心主题。在此基础上,本文将对《2019 年国家矿产政策》和《土地征用、恢复和重新安置公平补偿和透明权法案(2013 年)》中使用的 "受影响人员 "和 "当地社区 "等宏大术语进行仔细研究,以说明对这些不同看法的任何概括或普遍化都会压制人们的真正需求,因为他们会受到多方面的影响。此外,本文将 "发展 "视为 "pharmakon",因为它具有双重性,同一社区的人将其视为毒药;相反,对其他人来说,它是治疗贫困的良药。通过对所有不同声音的追溯,本文最终主张寻找 "重要他人",因为他们在很大程度上被排除在决策之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信