Developing sustainable dairy farms in the tropics: From policy to practice

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Titis Apdini, Corina E. van Middelaar, Simon J. Oosting
{"title":"Developing sustainable dairy farms in the tropics: From policy to practice","authors":"Titis Apdini,&nbsp;Corina E. van Middelaar,&nbsp;Simon J. Oosting","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>Sustainable dairy production is included in the policy agenda of many countries in the tropics to address, among others, their commitment to the Paris Agreement. To the best of our knowledge, however, a study to assess the impact of the proposed interventions for sustainable dairy production is still lacking for most of those countries. Using policy goals as entry points to develop scenarios can provide insight into the impact of policy interventions on dairy farming practices.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the implication of interventions towards sustainable dairy development identified by the governments of Indonesia and Costa Rica.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Information about current farming practices (i.e. the baseline) were collected on 32 smallholder dairy farms in Indonesia and 24 dairy farms in Costa Rica. Scenarios were designed based on policy goals for dairy development and climate change mitigation in each country. The scenarios for Indonesia encompassed relocation of the dairy sector to Sumatra to allow coupling of livestock to land combined with a restriction on manure production to ensure all manure to be applied to grow forage, and a restriction on the amount of purchased feeds, at two levels: maximally 100% and 50% of the baseline. The scenarios for Costa Rica included a silvopastoral system and a reduction in the amount of purchased feeds, at two levels: 50% and 80% lower than the baseline. We estimated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at chain level and carbon (C) stocks at farm level.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>The scenarios for Indonesia increased herd size and milk output by 240–360%, and GHG emissions per farm by 269–455%, while decreased GHG emissions per kg milk by 1–10%, compared to the baseline. C stocks per farm were higher in the scenarios than in the baseline, but compared to natural vegetation much more C is lost under the scenarios because more land is being used. The scenarios for Costa Rica reduced herd size and milk output by 5–25% and GHG emissions per farm by 17–35%, while GHG emissions per kg milk decreased by 10%, compared to the baseline. C stocks per farm were comparable.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>To achieve the multiple policy goals for sustainable dairy development, the governments need to consider the trade-off between increasing milk production and reducing GHG emissions. In Indonesia, relocation of the dairy sector needs a strict policy to avoid the expansion of dairy farms into tropical forest land. Furthermore, the Costa Rican government needs to incentivise dairy farmers to implement a silvopastoral system to reduce GHG emissions and land use. This, however, will be at the expense of milk output.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 104097"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002476/pdfft?md5=05966fd344ee07b451f01a40710ce431&pid=1-s2.0-S0308521X24002476-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002476","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT

Sustainable dairy production is included in the policy agenda of many countries in the tropics to address, among others, their commitment to the Paris Agreement. To the best of our knowledge, however, a study to assess the impact of the proposed interventions for sustainable dairy production is still lacking for most of those countries. Using policy goals as entry points to develop scenarios can provide insight into the impact of policy interventions on dairy farming practices.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the implication of interventions towards sustainable dairy development identified by the governments of Indonesia and Costa Rica.

METHODS

Information about current farming practices (i.e. the baseline) were collected on 32 smallholder dairy farms in Indonesia and 24 dairy farms in Costa Rica. Scenarios were designed based on policy goals for dairy development and climate change mitigation in each country. The scenarios for Indonesia encompassed relocation of the dairy sector to Sumatra to allow coupling of livestock to land combined with a restriction on manure production to ensure all manure to be applied to grow forage, and a restriction on the amount of purchased feeds, at two levels: maximally 100% and 50% of the baseline. The scenarios for Costa Rica included a silvopastoral system and a reduction in the amount of purchased feeds, at two levels: 50% and 80% lower than the baseline. We estimated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at chain level and carbon (C) stocks at farm level.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The scenarios for Indonesia increased herd size and milk output by 240–360%, and GHG emissions per farm by 269–455%, while decreased GHG emissions per kg milk by 1–10%, compared to the baseline. C stocks per farm were higher in the scenarios than in the baseline, but compared to natural vegetation much more C is lost under the scenarios because more land is being used. The scenarios for Costa Rica reduced herd size and milk output by 5–25% and GHG emissions per farm by 17–35%, while GHG emissions per kg milk decreased by 10%, compared to the baseline. C stocks per farm were comparable.

SIGNIFICANCE

To achieve the multiple policy goals for sustainable dairy development, the governments need to consider the trade-off between increasing milk production and reducing GHG emissions. In Indonesia, relocation of the dairy sector needs a strict policy to avoid the expansion of dairy farms into tropical forest land. Furthermore, the Costa Rican government needs to incentivise dairy farmers to implement a silvopastoral system to reduce GHG emissions and land use. This, however, will be at the expense of milk output.

Abstract Image

在热带地区发展可持续奶牛场:从政策到实践
背景可持续乳制品生产已被纳入许多热带国家的政策议程,以履行其对《巴黎协定》的承诺。然而,据我们所知,这些国家中的大多数仍然缺乏对可持续乳制品生产拟议干预措施的影响进行评估的研究。本研究旨在评估印度尼西亚和哥斯达黎加政府确定的可持续奶业发展干预措施的影响。方法:收集了印度尼西亚 32 个小农奶牛场和哥斯达黎加 24 个奶牛场的当前养殖实践信息(即基线)。根据各国奶业发展和减缓气候变化的政策目标设计了各种情景。印度尼西亚的方案包括将奶业迁移到苏门答腊岛,使牲畜与土地结合起来,同时限制粪肥生产,以确保所有粪肥都用于种植牧草,并限制外购饲料的数量,分为两个等级:最大为基线的100%和50%。哥斯达黎加的设想方案包括建立青贮牧业系统和减少外购饲料量,减少量分为两个等级:分别比基准低 50%和 80%。我们估算了产业链层面的温室气体(GHG)排放量和牧场层面的碳(C)存量。结果和结论与基线相比,印度尼西亚的情景方案使牧群规模和牛奶产量增加了 240-360%,每个牧场的温室气体排放量增加了 269-455%,而每公斤牛奶的温室气体排放量减少了 1-10%。假设情景下每个农场的碳储量高于基线,但与自然植被相比,假设情景下损失的碳要多得多,因为使用的土地更多。与基线相比,哥斯达黎加的情景方案使牧群规模和牛奶产量减少了 5-25%,每个牧场的温室气体排放量减少了 17-35%,而每公斤牛奶的温室气体排放量减少了 10%。意义为实现乳业可持续发展的多重政策目标,政府需要考虑增加牛奶产量与减少温室气体排放之间的权衡。在印度尼西亚,奶业的迁移需要严格的政策,以避免奶牛场向热带林地扩张。此外,哥斯达黎加政府需要激励奶农实施林牧系统,以减少温室气体排放和土地使用。然而,这将以牺牲牛奶产量为代价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信