Anatomical Feasibility of Percutaneous Arteriovenous Fistula Formation in Korea.

Vascular and endovascular surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1177/15385744241274267
Ki Yoon Moon, Eun Ju Jang, Seung Hoon Lee, Hong Suk Han, Sun Cheol Park, Jang Yong Kim, Sang Seob Yun
{"title":"Anatomical Feasibility of Percutaneous Arteriovenous Fistula Formation in Korea.","authors":"Ki Yoon Moon, Eun Ju Jang, Seung Hoon Lee, Hong Suk Han, Sun Cheol Park, Jang Yong Kim, Sang Seob Yun","doi":"10.1177/15385744241274267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Currently, there are two types of percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF) formation systems approved by the FDA: Ellipsys and WavelinQ. Although these systems are already in use in Europe or the United States, they have not been approved for use in Korea yet. For this reason, this study aimed to check anatomical feasibility of these systems for Korean population prior to their actual use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who received ultrasound vein mapping for arteriovenous fistula formation from June 2021 to June 2022 were included. The anatomical feasibility of each system was confirmed according to the manufacturer's instructions for use (IFU).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upper extremity ultrasonography was performed for a total of 83 patients to determine their feasibility for pAVF formation. Of these patients, 65.1% were feasible for pAVF formation with appropriate deep communicating vein (DCV) and outflow. Among them, 57.8% were feasible for the Ellipsys system and 54.2% were feasible for the WavelinQ system. Most patients who were infeasible for pAVF formation had a DCV of small size. Ulnar vessels were more suitable than radial vessel for WavelinQ (54.2% vs 33.7%, <i>P</i>-value = .012). The most common reason for not meeting the criteria was a small vein size at the access site.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More than half of all patients were feasible for pAVF formation in this study. Ellipsys had a higher feasibility than WavelinQ, although they showed no significant difference in the feasibility. If these devices are imported into Korea, it will be a good opportunity for many patients to reduce the surgical burden and create AVFs more easily through these procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241274267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Currently, there are two types of percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF) formation systems approved by the FDA: Ellipsys and WavelinQ. Although these systems are already in use in Europe or the United States, they have not been approved for use in Korea yet. For this reason, this study aimed to check anatomical feasibility of these systems for Korean population prior to their actual use.

Methods: Consecutive patients who received ultrasound vein mapping for arteriovenous fistula formation from June 2021 to June 2022 were included. The anatomical feasibility of each system was confirmed according to the manufacturer's instructions for use (IFU).

Results: Upper extremity ultrasonography was performed for a total of 83 patients to determine their feasibility for pAVF formation. Of these patients, 65.1% were feasible for pAVF formation with appropriate deep communicating vein (DCV) and outflow. Among them, 57.8% were feasible for the Ellipsys system and 54.2% were feasible for the WavelinQ system. Most patients who were infeasible for pAVF formation had a DCV of small size. Ulnar vessels were more suitable than radial vessel for WavelinQ (54.2% vs 33.7%, P-value = .012). The most common reason for not meeting the criteria was a small vein size at the access site.

Conclusions: More than half of all patients were feasible for pAVF formation in this study. Ellipsys had a higher feasibility than WavelinQ, although they showed no significant difference in the feasibility. If these devices are imported into Korea, it will be a good opportunity for many patients to reduce the surgical burden and create AVFs more easily through these procedures.

韩国经皮动静脉瘘形成的解剖可行性。
简介:目前,有两种经皮动静脉瘘(pAVF)形成系统获得了美国食品及药物管理局(FDA)的批准:Ellipsys 和 WavelinQ。虽然这些系统已在欧洲或美国使用,但在韩国尚未获准使用。因此,本研究旨在检查这些系统在实际使用前在韩国人群中的解剖可行性:方法:纳入 2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 6 月期间因动静脉瘘形成而接受超声静脉造影的连续患者。根据制造商的使用说明(IFU),确认每种系统在解剖学上的可行性:共为 83 名患者进行了上肢超声检查,以确定其形成 pAVF 的可行性。在这些患者中,65.1%的患者可通过适当的深腔静脉(DCV)和血流形成 pAVF。其中,57.8%的患者适用于Ellipsys系统,54.2%的患者适用于WavelinQ系统。大多数不适合形成 pAVF 的患者的 DCV 较小。对于WavelinQ来说,尺侧血管比桡侧血管更适合(54.2% vs 33.7%,P值 = .012)。不符合标准的最常见原因是入路部位的静脉较小:结论:在这项研究中,半数以上的患者都可以形成 pAVF。Ellipsys的可行性高于WavelinQ,尽管两者在可行性上没有显著差异。如果韩国引进这些设备,将为许多患者提供一个很好的机会,减轻手术负担,并通过这些手术更容易地形成 AVF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信