Wideband radiofrequency pulse sequence for evaluation of myocardial scar in patients with cardiac implantable devices.

Frontiers in radiology Pub Date : 2024-08-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fradi.2024.1327406
Neil D Shah, Mayil Krishnam, Bharat Ambale Venkatesh, Fouzia Khan, Michele Smith, Darwin R Jones, Patrick Koon, Xianglun Mao, Martin A Janich, Anja C S Brau, Michael Salerno, Rajesh Dash, Frandics Chan, Phillip C Yang
{"title":"Wideband radiofrequency pulse sequence for evaluation of myocardial scar in patients with cardiac implantable devices.","authors":"Neil D Shah, Mayil Krishnam, Bharat Ambale Venkatesh, Fouzia Khan, Michele Smith, Darwin R Jones, Patrick Koon, Xianglun Mao, Martin A Janich, Anja C S Brau, Michael Salerno, Rajesh Dash, Frandics Chan, Phillip C Yang","doi":"10.3389/fradi.2024.1327406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac magnetic resonance is a useful clinical tool to identify late gadolinium enhancement in heart failure patients with implantable electronic devices. Identification of LGE in patients with CIED is limited by artifact, which can be improved with a wide band radiofrequency pulse sequence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The authors hypothesize that image quality of LGE images produced using wide-band pulse sequence in patients with devices is comparable to image quality produced using standard LGE sequences in patients without devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two independent readers reviewed LGE images of 16 patients with CIED and 7 patients without intracardiac devices to assess for image quality, device-related artifact, and presence of LGE using the American Society of Echocardiography/American Heart Association 17 segment model of the heart on a 4-point Likert scale. The mean and standard deviation for image quality and artifact rating were determined. Inter-observer reliability was determined by calculating Cohen's kappa coefficient. Statistical significance was determined by <i>T</i>-test as a <i>p</i> {less than or equal to} 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients underwent CMR without any adverse events. Overall IQ of WB LGE images was significantly better in patients with devices compared to standard LGE in patients without devices (<i>p</i> = 0.001) with reduction in overall artifact rating (<i>p</i> = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests wide-band pulse sequence for LGE can be applied safely to heart failure patients with devices in detection of LV myocardial scar while maintaining image quality, reducing artifact, and following routine imaging protocol after intravenous gadolinium contrast administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":73101,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11339872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2024.1327406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance is a useful clinical tool to identify late gadolinium enhancement in heart failure patients with implantable electronic devices. Identification of LGE in patients with CIED is limited by artifact, which can be improved with a wide band radiofrequency pulse sequence.

Objective: The authors hypothesize that image quality of LGE images produced using wide-band pulse sequence in patients with devices is comparable to image quality produced using standard LGE sequences in patients without devices.

Methods: Two independent readers reviewed LGE images of 16 patients with CIED and 7 patients without intracardiac devices to assess for image quality, device-related artifact, and presence of LGE using the American Society of Echocardiography/American Heart Association 17 segment model of the heart on a 4-point Likert scale. The mean and standard deviation for image quality and artifact rating were determined. Inter-observer reliability was determined by calculating Cohen's kappa coefficient. Statistical significance was determined by T-test as a p {less than or equal to} 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval.

Results: All patients underwent CMR without any adverse events. Overall IQ of WB LGE images was significantly better in patients with devices compared to standard LGE in patients without devices (p = 0.001) with reduction in overall artifact rating (p = 0.05).

Conclusion: Our study suggests wide-band pulse sequence for LGE can be applied safely to heart failure patients with devices in detection of LV myocardial scar while maintaining image quality, reducing artifact, and following routine imaging protocol after intravenous gadolinium contrast administration.

用于评估心脏植入装置患者心肌瘢痕的宽带射频脉冲序列。
背景:心脏磁共振是识别植入电子装置的心衰患者晚期钆增强的有效临床工具。对植入式电子装置患者 LGE 的识别受到伪影的限制,而宽带射频脉冲序列可以改善伪影:作者假设,使用宽带脉冲序列为植入电子设备的患者绘制的 LGE 图像质量与使用标准 LGE 序列为未植入电子设备的患者绘制的图像质量相当:两名独立阅读者分别对 16 名 CIED 患者和 7 名未安装心内装置的患者的 LGE 图像进行了审查,采用美国超声心动图学会/美国心脏协会 17 节段心脏模型,以 4 点李克特量表评估图像质量、装置相关伪影和 LGE 的存在。确定图像质量和伪影评级的平均值和标准偏差。通过计算科恩卡帕系数确定观察者之间的可靠性。统计意义通过 T 检验确定,P{小于或等于}0.05,置信区间为 95%:所有患者均接受了 CMR 检查,无任何不良反应。与无装置患者的标准 LGE 相比,有装置患者的 WB LGE 图像总体智商明显更高(p = 0.001),总体伪影评级降低(p = 0.05):我们的研究表明,宽波段脉冲序列 LGE 可以安全地应用于带装置的心衰患者,在检测左心室心肌瘢痕的同时保持图像质量,减少伪影,并在静脉注射钆对比剂后遵循常规成像方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信