Neurological soft signs and olfactory dysfunction in patients with borderline personality disorder

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
{"title":"Neurological soft signs and olfactory dysfunction in patients with borderline personality disorder","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a serious disorder with a lifetime prevalence of 2.7–5.9% and is thought to correlate with altered neuroplasticity. The aim of the present study is to investigate possible associations of BPD (−severity) and alterations in neurological soft signs (NSS) and olfactory function.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>For the monocentric observational study, 39 female subjects with a BPD diagnosis and 19 female healthy control subjects were recruited. The groups were matched by age. Olfactory functions were examined using Sniffin’ Sticks. NSS were assessed by a standardized test with 50 items.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>BPD subjects have higher NSS scores in group comparison. By contrast, there are no alterations in the total score of olfactory function, while the BPD subjects scored higher in smell identification. Within the BPD group, the total NSS score was discovered to have a negative correlation with olfactory function. BPD subjects taking antipsychotics show more NSS than those without. We found no significant influence of posttraumatic stress disorder on the NSS or olfactory function. The BPD-severity correlates with NSS.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Due to the cross-sectional design, we did not have a follow up examination. The sample size was small, and all patients had psychiatric comorbidities. Additionally, we did not perform MRI to connect our findings with possible structural abnormalities.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study confirmed altered NSS in BPD patients, whereas no impairment in the olfactory function was found. Further research is required to establish NSS and smell tests as clinical screening tools in BPD patients and to uncover the disorder's impact on neuroplasticity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54549,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278584624001866/pdfft?md5=0a8a133c6361a098a63310f9d1092833&pid=1-s2.0-S0278584624001866-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278584624001866","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a serious disorder with a lifetime prevalence of 2.7–5.9% and is thought to correlate with altered neuroplasticity. The aim of the present study is to investigate possible associations of BPD (−severity) and alterations in neurological soft signs (NSS) and olfactory function.

Methods

For the monocentric observational study, 39 female subjects with a BPD diagnosis and 19 female healthy control subjects were recruited. The groups were matched by age. Olfactory functions were examined using Sniffin’ Sticks. NSS were assessed by a standardized test with 50 items.

Results

BPD subjects have higher NSS scores in group comparison. By contrast, there are no alterations in the total score of olfactory function, while the BPD subjects scored higher in smell identification. Within the BPD group, the total NSS score was discovered to have a negative correlation with olfactory function. BPD subjects taking antipsychotics show more NSS than those without. We found no significant influence of posttraumatic stress disorder on the NSS or olfactory function. The BPD-severity correlates with NSS.

Limitations

Due to the cross-sectional design, we did not have a follow up examination. The sample size was small, and all patients had psychiatric comorbidities. Additionally, we did not perform MRI to connect our findings with possible structural abnormalities.

Conclusions

Our study confirmed altered NSS in BPD patients, whereas no impairment in the olfactory function was found. Further research is required to establish NSS and smell tests as clinical screening tools in BPD patients and to uncover the disorder's impact on neuroplasticity.

边缘型人格障碍患者的神经系统软体征和嗅觉功能障碍。
背景:边缘型人格障碍(BPD)是一种严重的疾病,终生患病率为 2.7%-5.9%,被认为与神经可塑性的改变有关。本研究旨在探讨 BPD(严重程度)与神经系统软体征(NSS)和嗅觉功能改变之间可能存在的关联:在这项单中心观察性研究中,共招募了 39 名确诊为 BPD 的女性受试者和 19 名女性健康对照受试者。两组受试者的年龄相匹配。嗅觉功能用嗅棒进行检测。结果显示,BPD 受试者的 NSS 值更高:结果:BPD 受试者的 NSS 得分在组间比较中较高。相比之下,嗅觉功能总分没有变化,而 BPD 受试者在气味识别方面得分更高。在 BPD 组中,NSS 总分与嗅觉功能呈负相关。服用抗精神病药物的 BPD 受试者比未服用抗精神病药物的受试者表现出更多的 NSS。我们发现创伤后应激障碍对 NSS 或嗅觉功能没有明显影响。BPD严重程度与NSS相关:由于是横断面设计,我们没有进行后续检查。样本量较小,而且所有患者都合并有精神疾病。此外,我们没有进行核磁共振成像,因此无法将我们的发现与可能存在的结构异常联系起来:我们的研究证实,BPD 患者的 NSS 发生了改变,但未发现嗅觉功能受损。要将 NSS 和嗅觉测试作为 BPD 患者的临床筛查工具,并揭示该疾病对神经可塑性的影响,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry is an international and multidisciplinary journal which aims to ensure the rapid publication of authoritative reviews and research papers dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neuro-psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry. Issues of the journal are regularly devoted wholly in or in part to a topical subject. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry does not publish work on the actions of biological extracts unless the pharmacological active molecular substrate and/or specific receptor binding properties of the extract compounds are elucidated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信