Efficacy and Safety of Pimodivir Combined With Standard of Care in Hospitalized and Nonhospitalized High-Risk Adolescents and Adults With Influenza A Infection.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Lorant Leopold, Johan Vingerhoets, Sofie Deleu, Catherine Nalpas, Karin Weber, Ilse van Dromme, David Lowson, Bart Michiels, Wilbert van Duijnhoven
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Pimodivir Combined With Standard of Care in Hospitalized and Nonhospitalized High-Risk Adolescents and Adults With Influenza A Infection.","authors":"Lorant Leopold, Johan Vingerhoets, Sofie Deleu, Catherine Nalpas, Karin Weber, Ilse van Dromme, David Lowson, Bart Michiels, Wilbert van Duijnhoven","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiae408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An unmet need exists for effective antivirals to treat patients hospitalized with influenza. The results of 2 phase 3 studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of pimodivir in combination with investigator-chosen standard of care (SoC) treatment are presented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospitalized patients (hospital study; NCT03376321) and high-risk outpatients (outpatient study; NCT03381196) with laboratory-confirmed influenza A infection were randomized 1:1 to 600 mg pimodivir twice daily + SoC or placebo twice daily + SoC for 5 days. For most patients, SoC included oseltamivir. Primary end points were Hospital Recovery Scale (HRS) at day 6 (hospital study) and median time to resolution (TTR) of influenza-related symptoms (outpatient study).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pimodivir + SoC (oseltamivir) treatment showed no clinical benefit over placebo + SoC on HRS at day 6 (common odds ratio, 0.943; 95% confidence interval [CI], .609-1.462; P = .397; hospital study). A shorter median TTR of 7 symptoms was estimated with pimodivir + SoC versus placebo (92.6 hours; 95% CI, 77.6-104.2 vs 105.1 hours; 95% CI, 92.7-128.6; P = .0216; outpatient study).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pimodivir + SoC showed no additional clinical benefit versus SoC treatment alone in hospitalized patients. Pimodivir + SoC demonstrated shorter TTR of influenza symptoms versus placebo + SoC in high-risk outpatients.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT03376321 and NCT03381196.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"e132-e143"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11793051/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae408","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An unmet need exists for effective antivirals to treat patients hospitalized with influenza. The results of 2 phase 3 studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of pimodivir in combination with investigator-chosen standard of care (SoC) treatment are presented.

Methods: Hospitalized patients (hospital study; NCT03376321) and high-risk outpatients (outpatient study; NCT03381196) with laboratory-confirmed influenza A infection were randomized 1:1 to 600 mg pimodivir twice daily + SoC or placebo twice daily + SoC for 5 days. For most patients, SoC included oseltamivir. Primary end points were Hospital Recovery Scale (HRS) at day 6 (hospital study) and median time to resolution (TTR) of influenza-related symptoms (outpatient study).

Results: Pimodivir + SoC (oseltamivir) treatment showed no clinical benefit over placebo + SoC on HRS at day 6 (common odds ratio, 0.943; 95% confidence interval [CI], .609-1.462; P = .397; hospital study). A shorter median TTR of 7 symptoms was estimated with pimodivir + SoC versus placebo (92.6 hours; 95% CI, 77.6-104.2 vs 105.1 hours; 95% CI, 92.7-128.6; P = .0216; outpatient study).

Conclusions: Pimodivir + SoC showed no additional clinical benefit versus SoC treatment alone in hospitalized patients. Pimodivir + SoC demonstrated shorter TTR of influenza symptoms versus placebo + SoC in high-risk outpatients.

Clinical trial registration: NCT03376321 and NCT03381196.

皮莫地韦联合标准护理对感染甲型流感的住院和非住院高危青少年和成人的疗效和安全性。
背景:治疗住院流感患者对有效抗病毒药物的需求尚未得到满足。方法:将实验室确诊感染甲型流感的住院患者(医院研究;NCT03376321)和高风险门诊患者(门诊研究;NCT03381196)按1:1比例随机分配到600毫克吡莫地韦,每日两次(BID)+SoC,或安慰剂,每日两次+SoC,共5天。大多数患者的SoC包括奥司他韦。主要终点是第6天的医院康复量表(HRS)(住院研究)和流感相关症状缓解的中位时间(TTR)(门诊研究):在第6天的HRS上,匹莫德韦+SoC(奥司他韦)治疗与安慰剂+SoC相比没有临床获益(常见几率比为0.943 [95% CI, 0.609-1.462],P = .397;医院研究)。与安慰剂相比,皮莫地韦+SoC的7个症状的中位TTR估计更短(92.6小时[95% CI,77.6-104.2]对105.1小时[95% CI,92.7-128.6],P = .0216;门诊研究):结论:在住院患者中,"匹莫迪韦+SoC "与单独使用 "SoC "治疗相比没有额外的临床益处。在高危门诊患者中,与安慰剂+SoC相比,皮莫地韦+SoC可缩短流感症状的TTR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Infectious Diseases
Journal of Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
449
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published continuously since 1904, The Journal of Infectious Diseases (JID) is the premier global journal for original research on infectious diseases. The editors welcome Major Articles and Brief Reports describing research results on microbiology, immunology, epidemiology, and related disciplines, on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases; on the microbes that cause them; and on disorders of host immune responses. JID is an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信