Predictors and outcomes associated with right ventricular function in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome treated with Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Perfusion-Uk Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1177/02676591241277947
Roman Melamed, Jason Block, Summer L Martins, Daniel Bullard, Leeore Levinstein, Angela Phillips, Ramiro Saavedra
{"title":"Predictors and outcomes associated with right ventricular function in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome treated with Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.","authors":"Roman Melamed, Jason Block, Summer L Martins, Daniel Bullard, Leeore Levinstein, Angela Phillips, Ramiro Saavedra","doi":"10.1177/02676591241277947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionRight ventricular dysfunction is associated with mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) but information in veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) settings is limited. Study objectives were to examine factors associated with right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction (RVSD) and RV dilation in ECMO patients with ARDS, to compare outcomes in those with and without RVSD and RV dilation defined by qualitative and quantitative parameters, and to describe RVSD evolution during ECMO.MethodsRetrospective observational study of adult ARDS patients supported with ECMO at a tertiary care hospital.ResultsOf a total of 62 patients, 56% had RVSD and 61% had RV dilation by qualitative assessment. Male gender, COVID-19, hypercarbia, and pneumothorax were associated with RVSD and RV dilation. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients with RV dilation vs. no dilation (42% vs. 17%, <i>p</i> = .05) but comparisons for patients with and without RVSD (37% vs. 26%, respectively) did not reach statistical significance. Findings were similar when RV size and function were quantified by right to left ventricle end-diastolic area ratio and fractional area change (39% vs. 21% and 36% vs. 20% respectively; p = NS). Of 39 patients with multiple echocardiograms, 9 of 18 with initially normal RV function developed RVSD while RV function normalized in 10 of 21 patients who began ECMO with RVSD.ConclusionsStudy results suggest an association of RV dilation and RVSD with worse outcomes and a dynamic nature of RV function necessitating close monitoring during the ECMO course.</p>","PeriodicalId":49707,"journal":{"name":"Perfusion-Uk","volume":" ","pages":"1461-1467"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfusion-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241277947","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionRight ventricular dysfunction is associated with mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) but information in veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) settings is limited. Study objectives were to examine factors associated with right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction (RVSD) and RV dilation in ECMO patients with ARDS, to compare outcomes in those with and without RVSD and RV dilation defined by qualitative and quantitative parameters, and to describe RVSD evolution during ECMO.MethodsRetrospective observational study of adult ARDS patients supported with ECMO at a tertiary care hospital.ResultsOf a total of 62 patients, 56% had RVSD and 61% had RV dilation by qualitative assessment. Male gender, COVID-19, hypercarbia, and pneumothorax were associated with RVSD and RV dilation. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients with RV dilation vs. no dilation (42% vs. 17%, p = .05) but comparisons for patients with and without RVSD (37% vs. 26%, respectively) did not reach statistical significance. Findings were similar when RV size and function were quantified by right to left ventricle end-diastolic area ratio and fractional area change (39% vs. 21% and 36% vs. 20% respectively; p = NS). Of 39 patients with multiple echocardiograms, 9 of 18 with initially normal RV function developed RVSD while RV function normalized in 10 of 21 patients who began ECMO with RVSD.ConclusionsStudy results suggest an association of RV dilation and RVSD with worse outcomes and a dynamic nature of RV function necessitating close monitoring during the ECMO course.

接受静脉体外膜氧合治疗的成人呼吸窘迫综合征患者右心室功能的相关预测因素和预后。
导言:右心室功能障碍与急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的死亡率有关,但静脉体外膜氧合(ECMO)环境中的相关信息却很有限。研究目的是检查与 ARDS ECMO 患者右心室收缩功能障碍(RVSD)和 RV 扩张相关的因素,比较有和没有 RVSD 和 RV 扩张(通过定性和定量参数定义)患者的预后,并描述 ECMO 期间 RVSD 的演变情况:方法:对一家三级医院接受 ECMO 支持的成年 ARDS 患者进行回顾性观察研究:结果:在 62 名患者中,56% 有 RVSD,61% 有 RV 扩张。男性、COVID-19、高碳酸血症和气胸与 RVSD 和 RV 扩张有关。RV扩张患者的院内死亡率明显高于无扩张患者(42% vs. 17%,P = .05),但有RVSD和无RVSD患者的院内死亡率比较(分别为37% vs. 26%)未达到统计学意义。通过右心室与左心室舒张末期面积比值和分数面积变化来量化左心室大小和功能时,结果类似(分别为 39% 对 21% 和 36% 对 20%;P = NS)。在39名多次接受超声心动图检查的患者中,18名最初RV功能正常的患者中有9名出现了RVSD,而21名开始接受ECMO时出现RVSD的患者中有10名RV功能恢复正常:研究结果表明,RV 扩张和 RVSD 与较差的预后有关,而且 RV 功能具有动态性,需要在 ECMO 过程中进行密切监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perfusion-Uk
Perfusion-Uk 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perfusion is an ISI-ranked, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, which provides current information on all aspects of perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their use in modern cardiac surgery. The journal is at the forefront of international research and development and presents an appropriately multidisciplinary approach to perfusion science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信