[Preliminary comparative study of spinal robot-assisted pedicle screw placement using different surgical approaches].

Q3 Medicine
Yang Yu, Bing Wu, Kai Song, Keran Song, Pengfei Chi, Haoming Liu, Zheng Wang
{"title":"[Preliminary comparative study of spinal robot-assisted pedicle screw placement using different surgical approaches].","authors":"Yang Yu, Bing Wu, Kai Song, Keran Song, Pengfei Chi, Haoming Liu, Zheng Wang","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202404112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of spinal robot-assisted pedicle screw placement through different surgical approaches and to guide the clinical selection of appropriate robot-assisted surgical approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 14 patients with thoracolumbar vertebral diseases who met the selection criteria between January 2023 and August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, and all of them underwent pedicle screw placement under assistant of the Mazor X spinal surgery robot through different surgical approaches. The patients were divided into posterior median approach (PMA) group ( <i>n</i>=6) and intermuscular approach (IMA) group ( <i>n</i>=8) according to the surgical approaches, and there was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, disease type, and fixed segment between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, screw-related complications, and reoperation rate were recorded and compared between the two groups; the inclination angle of the screw, the distance between the screw and the midline, and the caudal inclination angle of the screw were measured based on X-ray films at immediate after operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). There was no screw-related complication such as nerve injury in both groups, and no patients underwent secondary surgery. At immediate after operation, the inclination angle of the screw, the distance between the screw and the midline, and the caudal inclination angle of the screw in the IMA group were significantly greater than those in the PMA group ( <i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are differences in the position and inclination angle of screws placed with robot-assisted surgery through different surgical approaches, which may be due to the obstruction of the screw path by soft tissues such as skin and muscles. When using spinal robot-assisted surgery, selecting the appropriate surgical approach for different diseases can make the treatment more reasonable and effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11335597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202404112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of spinal robot-assisted pedicle screw placement through different surgical approaches and to guide the clinical selection of appropriate robot-assisted surgical approaches.

Methods: The clinical data of 14 patients with thoracolumbar vertebral diseases who met the selection criteria between January 2023 and August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, and all of them underwent pedicle screw placement under assistant of the Mazor X spinal surgery robot through different surgical approaches. The patients were divided into posterior median approach (PMA) group ( n=6) and intermuscular approach (IMA) group ( n=8) according to the surgical approaches, and there was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, disease type, and fixed segment between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, screw-related complications, and reoperation rate were recorded and compared between the two groups; the inclination angle of the screw, the distance between the screw and the midline, and the caudal inclination angle of the screw were measured based on X-ray films at immediate after operation.

Results: There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups ( P>0.05). There was no screw-related complication such as nerve injury in both groups, and no patients underwent secondary surgery. At immediate after operation, the inclination angle of the screw, the distance between the screw and the midline, and the caudal inclination angle of the screw in the IMA group were significantly greater than those in the PMA group ( P<0.05).

Conclusion: There are differences in the position and inclination angle of screws placed with robot-assisted surgery through different surgical approaches, which may be due to the obstruction of the screw path by soft tissues such as skin and muscles. When using spinal robot-assisted surgery, selecting the appropriate surgical approach for different diseases can make the treatment more reasonable and effective.

[使用不同手术方法进行脊柱机器人辅助椎弓根螺钉置入术的初步比较研究]。
目的比较不同手术方式下脊柱机器人辅助椎弓根螺钉置入术的效果,指导临床选择合适的机器人辅助手术方式:回顾性分析2023年1月至2023年8月期间符合入选标准的14例胸腰椎疾病患者的临床资料,所有患者均在Mazor X脊柱手术机器人的辅助下通过不同的手术方式进行了椎弓根螺钉置入术。根据手术方式将患者分为后正中入路(PMA)组(6 例)和肌间入路(IMA)组(8 例),两组患者在年龄、性别、体重指数、疾病类型、固定节段等方面差异无学意义(P>0.05)。记录并比较两组患者的手术时间、术中失血量、螺钉相关并发症和再手术率;根据术后X光片测量螺钉的倾斜角度、螺钉与中线的距离和螺钉的尾部倾斜角度:两组手术时间和术中失血量无明显差异(P>0.05)。两组患者均未发生神经损伤等与螺钉相关的并发症,也没有患者进行二次手术。术后即刻,IMA 组螺钉的倾斜角度、螺钉与中线的距离以及螺钉的尾部倾斜角度均明显大于 PMA 组(结论:两组患者的螺钉位置和倾斜角度存在差异:通过不同的手术方法使用机器人辅助手术放置螺钉的位置和倾斜角度存在差异,这可能是由于皮肤和肌肉等软组织阻挡了螺钉的路径。在使用脊柱机器人辅助手术时,针对不同疾病选择合适的手术方式,可以使治疗更加合理有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信