[Effectiveness analysis of biplanar vertical fixation and inverted triangle fixation with hollow screw for Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients].

Q3 Medicine
Yonghui Zhou, Lei Li, Chong Li, Meng Li, Li Li, Lei Xu, Gang Yao, Wei Xu, Shiyuan Fang
{"title":"[Effectiveness analysis of biplanar vertical fixation and inverted triangle fixation with hollow screw for Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients].","authors":"Yonghui Zhou, Lei Li, Chong Li, Meng Li, Li Li, Lei Xu, Gang Yao, Wei Xu, Shiyuan Fang","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202404070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of biplanar vertical fixation and inverted triangle fixation with hollow screw for Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 55 young and middle-aged patients with Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture between June 2021 and December 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with closed reduction and internal fixation with hollow screws, 25 cases were treated with biplanar vertical fixation (study group), 30 cases with inverted triangle fixation (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, affected side, cause of injury, underlying diseases, and time from injury to operation between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy times, guide needle puncture times, starting time of weight bearing, time of full weight bearing, time of fracture healing, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The hip joint function was evaluated by Harris score at 1 day, 6 months, 12 months after operation, and at last follow-up, and the pain relief was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score. The femoral neck shortening was measured on the X-ray film at last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients were followed up 12-31 months (mean, 22.0 months), and there was no significant difference in follow-up time between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and fluoroscopy times in the study group were higher than those in the control group, but the difference was not significant ( <i>P</i>>0.05). The guide needle puncture times in the study group was more than that in the control group, and the time of starting weight bearing and the time of full weight bearing in the study group were shorter than those in the control group, the differences were significant ( <i>P</i><0.05). Bony healing was achieved in both groups, and there was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups ( <i>P></i>0.05). No osteonecrosis of the femoral head and incision-related complication was found in the two groups during follow-up, and the femoral neck shortening length in the study group was significantly shorter than that in the control group at last follow-up ( <i>P</i><0.05). There was no significant difference in Harris score between the two groups at 1 day after operation ( <i>P</i>>0.05), and the Harris score of the study group was significantly better than that of the control group at other time points ( <i>P</i><0.05); there was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups at each time point after operation ( <i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with the inverted triangle fixation, the treatment of Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture with biplanar vertical fixation can effectively reduce femoral neck shortening without affecting fracture healing, and improve hip joint function in early stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"38 8","pages":"961-967"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11335601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202404070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of biplanar vertical fixation and inverted triangle fixation with hollow screw for Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients.

Methods: The clinical data of 55 young and middle-aged patients with Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture between June 2021 and December 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with closed reduction and internal fixation with hollow screws, 25 cases were treated with biplanar vertical fixation (study group), 30 cases with inverted triangle fixation (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, affected side, cause of injury, underlying diseases, and time from injury to operation between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy times, guide needle puncture times, starting time of weight bearing, time of full weight bearing, time of fracture healing, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The hip joint function was evaluated by Harris score at 1 day, 6 months, 12 months after operation, and at last follow-up, and the pain relief was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score. The femoral neck shortening was measured on the X-ray film at last follow-up.

Results: All patients were followed up 12-31 months (mean, 22.0 months), and there was no significant difference in follow-up time between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and fluoroscopy times in the study group were higher than those in the control group, but the difference was not significant ( P>0.05). The guide needle puncture times in the study group was more than that in the control group, and the time of starting weight bearing and the time of full weight bearing in the study group were shorter than those in the control group, the differences were significant ( P<0.05). Bony healing was achieved in both groups, and there was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups ( P>0.05). No osteonecrosis of the femoral head and incision-related complication was found in the two groups during follow-up, and the femoral neck shortening length in the study group was significantly shorter than that in the control group at last follow-up ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Harris score between the two groups at 1 day after operation ( P>0.05), and the Harris score of the study group was significantly better than that of the control group at other time points ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups at each time point after operation ( P>0.05).

Conclusion: Compared with the inverted triangle fixation, the treatment of Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture with biplanar vertical fixation can effectively reduce femoral neck shortening without affecting fracture healing, and improve hip joint function in early stage.

[双平面垂直固定和空心螺钉倒三角形固定治疗中青年 Pauwels Ⅲ 型股骨颈骨折的疗效分析]。
目的比较双平面垂直固定与空心螺钉倒三角形固定治疗中青年 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的效果:回顾性分析2021年6月至2022年12月期间55例中青年PauwelsⅢ型股骨颈骨折患者的临床资料。所有患者均采用闭合复位、空心螺钉内固定治疗,25 例采用双平面垂直固定治疗(研究组),30 例采用倒三角形固定治疗(对照组)。两组在性别、年龄、患侧、受伤原因、基础疾病、受伤至手术时间等方面无明显差异(P>0.05)。两组患者的手术时间、术中失血量、透视时间、导针穿刺时间、开始负重时间、完全负重时间、骨折愈合时间和并发症均有记录并进行比较。通过术后1天、6个月、12个月和最后一次随访时的Harris评分评估髋关节功能,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分评估疼痛缓解情况。最后一次随访时,通过 X 光片测量股骨颈缩短情况:所有患者均接受了 12-31 个月(平均 22.0 个月)的随访,两组随访时间无显著差异(P>0.05)。研究组的手术时间、术中失血量和透视时间均高于对照组,但差异不显著(P>0.05)。研究组导针穿刺次数多于对照组,研究组开始负重时间和完全负重时间短于对照组,差异有学意义(PP>0.05)。随访期间,两组患者均未发现股骨头坏死及切口相关并发症,最后一次随访时,研究组的股骨颈缩短长度明显短于对照组(PP>0.05),其他时间点研究组的Harris评分明显优于对照组(PP>0.05):结论:与倒三角形固定相比,双平面垂直固定治疗 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折能在不影响骨折愈合的情况下有效减少股骨颈缩短,早期改善髋关节功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信