[Comparative study of short-term effectiveness of three surgical methods for ulnar styloid base fracture complicated with triangular fibrocartilage complex injury].

Q3 Medicine
Yong Tian, Jiahe Dong, Yilong Wu, Jiangbo Tian, Wanshan Shang, Hailong Zhang, Xiaohui Wang
{"title":"[Comparative study of short-term effectiveness of three surgical methods for ulnar styloid base fracture complicated with triangular fibrocartilage complex injury].","authors":"Yong Tian, Jiahe Dong, Yilong Wu, Jiangbo Tian, Wanshan Shang, Hailong Zhang, Xiaohui Wang","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202403043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the short-term effectiveness of arthroscopic suture of triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC), arthroscopic suture of TFCC combined with open reduction and internal fixation, and simple open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of distal radius fractures combined with ulnar styloid base fractures and TFCC injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical data of 97 patients with distal radius fractures combined with ulnar styloid base fracture and TFCC injury, who were admitted between September 2019 and September 2022 and met the selective criteria, was retrospectively analyzed. After reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures, 37 cases underwent arthroscopic suture of TFCC (TFCC group), 31 cases underwent arthroscopic suture of TFCC combined with open reduction and internal fixation of ulnar styloid base fractures (combination group), and 29 cases underwent simple open reduction and internal fixation of ulnar styloid base fractures (internal fixation group). There was no significant difference in baseline data between groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05), such as gender, age, injury side, time from injury to operation, and preoperative radius height, palm inclination, ulnar deviation, grip strength, wrist range of motion (ROM) in rotation, ulnar-radial deviation, and flexion-extension. The differences (change value) in radius height, metacarpal inclination angle, ulnar deviation angle, grip strength, and wrist ROM in rotation, ulnar-radial deviation, and flexion-extension between preoperative and 12 months after operation in 3 groups were compared. The effectiveness was evaluated according to the modified Gartland-Werley score at 12 months after operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 14 months). X-ray films showed that there were 4 patients with non-union of ulnar styloid base fracture in TFCC group, and the remaining patients had fracture healing at 3 months after operation. The radius height, palm inclination, and ulnar deviation of 3 groups at 12 months after operation were significantly better than those before operation ( <i>P<</i>0.05); however, the differences in the change values of the above indexes between groups was not significant ( <i>P</i>>0.05). At 12 months after operation, the change values of wrist ROM in rotation, ulnar-radial deviation, and flexion-extension in the TFCC group and the combination group were significantly greater than those in the internal fixation group ( <i>P</i><0.05), and there was no significant difference between the TFCC group and the combination group ( <i>P</i>>0.05). The change values of grip strength was significantly greater in the combination group than in the internal fixation group ( <i>P</i><0.05); there was no significant difference between the other groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). The excellent and good rates according to the modified Gartland-Werley score were 91.89% (34/37), 93.54% (29/31), and 72.41% (21/29) in the TFCC group, the combination group, and the internal fixation group, respectively. The excellent and good rates of the TFCC group and the combination group were significantly higher than that of the internal fixation group ( <i>P</i><0.05); there was no significant difference between the TFCC group and the combination group ( <i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For ulnar styloid base fractures with TFCC injury, compared with simple open reduction and internal fixation, arthroscopic suture of TFCC or suture TFCC combined with internal fixation treatment are both beneficial for wrist function recovery, and their short-term effectiveness are similar. Therefore, arthroscopic suture of TFCC may be a better choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"38 8","pages":"968-975"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11335593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202403043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the short-term effectiveness of arthroscopic suture of triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC), arthroscopic suture of TFCC combined with open reduction and internal fixation, and simple open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of distal radius fractures combined with ulnar styloid base fractures and TFCC injury.

Methods: A clinical data of 97 patients with distal radius fractures combined with ulnar styloid base fracture and TFCC injury, who were admitted between September 2019 and September 2022 and met the selective criteria, was retrospectively analyzed. After reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures, 37 cases underwent arthroscopic suture of TFCC (TFCC group), 31 cases underwent arthroscopic suture of TFCC combined with open reduction and internal fixation of ulnar styloid base fractures (combination group), and 29 cases underwent simple open reduction and internal fixation of ulnar styloid base fractures (internal fixation group). There was no significant difference in baseline data between groups ( P>0.05), such as gender, age, injury side, time from injury to operation, and preoperative radius height, palm inclination, ulnar deviation, grip strength, wrist range of motion (ROM) in rotation, ulnar-radial deviation, and flexion-extension. The differences (change value) in radius height, metacarpal inclination angle, ulnar deviation angle, grip strength, and wrist ROM in rotation, ulnar-radial deviation, and flexion-extension between preoperative and 12 months after operation in 3 groups were compared. The effectiveness was evaluated according to the modified Gartland-Werley score at 12 months after operation.

Results: All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 14 months). X-ray films showed that there were 4 patients with non-union of ulnar styloid base fracture in TFCC group, and the remaining patients had fracture healing at 3 months after operation. The radius height, palm inclination, and ulnar deviation of 3 groups at 12 months after operation were significantly better than those before operation ( P<0.05); however, the differences in the change values of the above indexes between groups was not significant ( P>0.05). At 12 months after operation, the change values of wrist ROM in rotation, ulnar-radial deviation, and flexion-extension in the TFCC group and the combination group were significantly greater than those in the internal fixation group ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the TFCC group and the combination group ( P>0.05). The change values of grip strength was significantly greater in the combination group than in the internal fixation group ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference between the other groups ( P>0.05). The excellent and good rates according to the modified Gartland-Werley score were 91.89% (34/37), 93.54% (29/31), and 72.41% (21/29) in the TFCC group, the combination group, and the internal fixation group, respectively. The excellent and good rates of the TFCC group and the combination group were significantly higher than that of the internal fixation group ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference between the TFCC group and the combination group ( P>0.05).

Conclusion: For ulnar styloid base fractures with TFCC injury, compared with simple open reduction and internal fixation, arthroscopic suture of TFCC or suture TFCC combined with internal fixation treatment are both beneficial for wrist function recovery, and their short-term effectiveness are similar. Therefore, arthroscopic suture of TFCC may be a better choice.

[尺骨腕骨基底骨折并发三角纤维软骨复合体损伤的三种手术方法短期疗效比较研究]。
目的比较关节镜下三角纤维软骨复合体(TFCC)缝合术、关节镜下TFCC缝合术联合切开复位内固定术、单纯切开复位内固定术治疗桡骨远端骨折合并尺骨桡侧基底骨折合并TFCC损伤的短期疗效:回顾性分析2019年9月至2022年9月期间收治的符合选择标准的97例桡骨远端骨折合并尺骨桡侧基底骨折及TFCC损伤患者的临床资料。桡骨远端骨折切开复位内固定术后,37例行关节镜下TFCC缝合术(TFCC组),31例行关节镜下TFCC缝合术联合尺骨桡侧基底骨折切开复位内固定术(联合组),29例行单纯尺骨桡侧基底骨折切开复位内固定术(内固定组)。两组患者的性别、年龄、受伤侧、受伤至手术时间、术前桡骨高度、手掌倾斜度、尺侧偏位、握力、腕关节旋转、尺桡偏位和屈伸活动范围(ROM)等基线数据差异无学意义(P>0.05)。比较三组患者术前和术后 12 个月在桡骨高度、掌指倾角、尺侧偏角、握力以及腕关节旋转、尺桡偏转和屈伸活动范围方面的差异(变化值)。根据术后 12 个月的改良 Gartland-Werley 评分对疗效进行评估:结果:所有切口均第一时间愈合。所有患者均接受了 12-18 个月(平均 14 个月)的随访。X光片显示,TFCC组有4例患者尺骨髁基骨折未愈合,其余患者术后3个月骨折愈合。3 组患者术后 12 个月的桡骨高度、手掌倾斜度、尺侧偏差均明显优于术前(P0.05),但组间上述指标变化值差异无学意义(P>0.05)。术后12个月,TFCC组和联合组的腕关节旋转、尺桡侧偏移、屈伸ROM变化值均明显大于内固定组(PP>0.05)。联合组的握力变化值明显大于内固定组(PP>0.05)。根据改良 Gartland-Werley 评分,TFCC 组、联合组和内固定组的优良率和良好率分别为 91.89%(34/37)、93.54%(29/31)和 72.41%(21/29)。TFCC组和联合组的优良率和良好率明显高于内固定组(PP>0.05):结论:对于TFCC损伤的尺骨髁基骨折,与单纯切开复位内固定相比,关节镜下缝合TFCC或缝合TFCC联合内固定治疗均有利于腕关节功能的恢复,且短期疗效相似。因此,在关节镜下缝合 TFCC 可能是更好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信