Changes in blood gas in supine and prone positions in percutaneous stone surgery: does position have any advantage for hemodynamics?

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Yilmaz Erdal, Senocak Ibrahim, Ataman Mirac, Yuvanc Ercan
{"title":"Changes in blood gas in supine and prone positions in percutaneous stone surgery: does position have any advantage for hemodynamics?","authors":"Yilmaz Erdal, Senocak Ibrahim, Ataman Mirac, Yuvanc Ercan","doi":"10.1007/s00240-024-01615-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate whether different positions are advantageous for hemodynamics and respiratory balance in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures. Pre- and postoperative arterial blood gas data obtained during spontaneous breathing for 67 prone (Group 1) and 56 supine (Group 2) patients undergoing PCNL were analyzed. Additionally data on all patients' gender, age, body mass index, stone size, access and surgical duration, volume of irrigation fluid, length of hospital stay, requirement for blood transfusion, and residual stones were recorded: There were no differences between the groups in terms of age, stone size, operation time, access time, radiation exposure, transfusion requirements, stone-free rate, and length of hospitalization. A statistically significant pH decrease was observed in both groups in the postoperative period (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). There was a statistically significant increase in pCO<sub>2</sub> values in both groups in the postoperative period (p = 0.001 and p = 0.024, respectively), and that increase did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.624). A statistically significant decrease in pO<sub>2</sub> and SpO<sub>2</sub> values was observed in both groups in the postoperative period compared to the preoperative period. Again, no statistical difference was observed between the groups for these values. There was a statistically significant decrease in bicarbonate in both groups period (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Hemodynamics and the respiratory balance of the patient are impaired in both prone and supine positions. Neither position is superior to the other in this respect.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"52 1","pages":"121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01615-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate whether different positions are advantageous for hemodynamics and respiratory balance in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures. Pre- and postoperative arterial blood gas data obtained during spontaneous breathing for 67 prone (Group 1) and 56 supine (Group 2) patients undergoing PCNL were analyzed. Additionally data on all patients' gender, age, body mass index, stone size, access and surgical duration, volume of irrigation fluid, length of hospital stay, requirement for blood transfusion, and residual stones were recorded: There were no differences between the groups in terms of age, stone size, operation time, access time, radiation exposure, transfusion requirements, stone-free rate, and length of hospitalization. A statistically significant pH decrease was observed in both groups in the postoperative period (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). There was a statistically significant increase in pCO2 values in both groups in the postoperative period (p = 0.001 and p = 0.024, respectively), and that increase did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.624). A statistically significant decrease in pO2 and SpO2 values was observed in both groups in the postoperative period compared to the preoperative period. Again, no statistical difference was observed between the groups for these values. There was a statistically significant decrease in bicarbonate in both groups period (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Hemodynamics and the respiratory balance of the patient are impaired in both prone and supine positions. Neither position is superior to the other in this respect.

经皮取石手术中仰卧位和俯卧位的血气变化:体位对血流动力学有好处吗?
目的:评估不同体位是否有利于经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)患者的血液动力学和呼吸平衡。对 67 名俯卧位(第 1 组)和 56 名仰卧位(第 2 组)PCNL 患者术前和术后自主呼吸时获得的动脉血气数据进行了分析。此外,还记录了所有患者的性别、年龄、体重指数、结石大小、入院时间和手术时间、冲洗液量、住院时间、输血需求和残余结石等数据:两组患者在年龄、结石大小、手术时间、入院时间、辐射暴露、输血需求、无结石率和住院时间等方面均无差异。术后两组的 pH 值均有明显下降,差异有统计学意义(分别为 p = 0.001 和 p = 0.001)。术后两组患者的 pCO2 值均有明显增加(分别为 p = 0.001 和 p = 0.024),且组间差异不大(p = 0.624)。与术前相比,两组患者术后的 pO2 和 SpO2 值均出现了统计学意义上的明显下降。同样,这些数值在组间也没有统计学差异。两组患者术后碳酸氢盐的下降均有统计学意义(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信