Effectiveness of virtual-walking intervention combined with exercise on improving pain and function in incomplete spinal cord injury: a feasibility study.

IF 0.7 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sara Mollà-Casanova, Elena Muñoz-Gómez, Marta Aguilar-Rodríguez, Marta Inglés, Núria Sempere-Rubio, Noemí Moreno-Segura, Pilar Serra-Añó
{"title":"Effectiveness of virtual-walking intervention combined with exercise on improving pain and function in incomplete spinal cord injury: a feasibility study.","authors":"Sara Mollà-Casanova, Elena Muñoz-Gómez, Marta Aguilar-Rodríguez, Marta Inglés, Núria Sempere-Rubio, Noemí Moreno-Segura, Pilar Serra-Añó","doi":"10.1038/s41394-024-00675-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A feasibility pilot study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility a full-scale Randomized Controlled Trial aimed at assessing the beneficial effect of a Virtual Walking (VW)-based (Experimental intervention (EI)) on neuropathic pain and functionality in people with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A hospital service (Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe) and disability associations (TetraSport, CODIFIVA and ASPAYM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve people with chronic incomplete SCI were randomized to EI (VW plus therapeutic exercise program (TE)) -or Control Intervention (CI (placebo VW and TE)) groups. A six-week intervention (3 sessions/week) was carried out. To assess feasibility, the following outcomes were used: level of restriction and validity of inclusion and exclusion criteria, participants' compliance, accessibility and acceptability of the intervention for participants, adequate pre-training time of physiotherapists. To explore therapy effectiveness, pain severity, and interference, mean and maximum isometric strength, walking speed, and walking ability were assessed before (Time 1, T1) and after (Time 2, T2) the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>20% of the participants initially recruited did not meet inclusion criteria. In addition, all participants completed at least 80% of the intervention sessions and none of the participants dropped out before T2. No serious adverse event was found. Moreover, 91.67% of participants were willing to perform the intervention again and all therapists involved were adequately pre-trained. Finally, our preliminary results suggest that the proposed EI is effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A full-scale RCT is feasible and preliminary results suggest that VW with TE could have a beneficial impact on pain and functionality in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":22079,"journal":{"name":"Spinal Cord Series and Cases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11341745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal Cord Series and Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-024-00675-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: A feasibility pilot study.

Objective: To assess the feasibility a full-scale Randomized Controlled Trial aimed at assessing the beneficial effect of a Virtual Walking (VW)-based (Experimental intervention (EI)) on neuropathic pain and functionality in people with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI).

Setting: A hospital service (Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe) and disability associations (TetraSport, CODIFIVA and ASPAYM).

Methods: Twelve people with chronic incomplete SCI were randomized to EI (VW plus therapeutic exercise program (TE)) -or Control Intervention (CI (placebo VW and TE)) groups. A six-week intervention (3 sessions/week) was carried out. To assess feasibility, the following outcomes were used: level of restriction and validity of inclusion and exclusion criteria, participants' compliance, accessibility and acceptability of the intervention for participants, adequate pre-training time of physiotherapists. To explore therapy effectiveness, pain severity, and interference, mean and maximum isometric strength, walking speed, and walking ability were assessed before (Time 1, T1) and after (Time 2, T2) the intervention.

Results: 20% of the participants initially recruited did not meet inclusion criteria. In addition, all participants completed at least 80% of the intervention sessions and none of the participants dropped out before T2. No serious adverse event was found. Moreover, 91.67% of participants were willing to perform the intervention again and all therapists involved were adequately pre-trained. Finally, our preliminary results suggest that the proposed EI is effective.

Conclusion: A full-scale RCT is feasible and preliminary results suggest that VW with TE could have a beneficial impact on pain and functionality in this population.

Abstract Image

虚拟行走干预结合运动对改善不完全脊髓损伤患者疼痛和功能的效果:一项可行性研究。
研究设计可行性试点研究:评估全面随机对照试验的可行性,旨在评估基于虚拟行走(VW)的实验干预(EI)对不完全脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的神经性疼痛和功能性的有益影响:环境:医院服务机构(拉斐大学和理工医院)和残疾人协会(TetraSport、CODIFIVA 和 ASPAYM):12 名慢性不完全 SCI 患者被随机分为 EI 组(VW 加治疗性运动计划 (TE))和对照干预组(CI(安慰剂 VW 和 TE))。干预为期六周(每周三次)。为评估可行性,采用了以下结果:纳入和排除标准的限制程度和有效性、参与者的依从性、干预措施对参与者的可及性和可接受性、物理治疗师的充分预培训时间。为了探讨治疗效果、疼痛严重程度和干扰情况,在干预前(时间 1,T1)和干预后(时间 2,T2)对平均和最大等长肌力、行走速度和行走能力进行了评估。此外,所有参与者都完成了至少80%的干预课程,没有人在T2前退出。没有发现严重的不良事件。此外,91.67%的参与者愿意再次进行干预,所有参与的治疗师都经过了充分的前期培训。最后,我们的初步结果表明,建议的 EI 是有效的:全面的 RCT 是可行的,初步结果表明,使用 TE 的 VW 可以对这一人群的疼痛和功能产生有益的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spinal Cord Series and Cases
Spinal Cord Series and Cases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
92
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信