Mobile vaccination units to increase COVID-19 vaccination uptake in areas with lower coverage: a within-neighbourhood analysis using national registration data, the Netherlands, September-December 2021.

IF 9.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Mattijs S Lambooij, Joyce Pijpers, Jan van de Kassteele, Mirjam P Fransen, Susan Jm Hahné, Niek Hof, Floor M Kroese, Hester de Melker, Mart van Dijk, Ellen Uiters, Marijn de Bruin
{"title":"Mobile vaccination units to increase COVID-19 vaccination uptake in areas with lower coverage: a within-neighbourhood analysis using national registration data, the Netherlands, September-December 2021.","authors":"Mattijs S Lambooij, Joyce Pijpers, Jan van de Kassteele, Mirjam P Fransen, Susan Jm Hahné, Niek Hof, Floor M Kroese, Hester de Melker, Mart van Dijk, Ellen Uiters, Marijn de Bruin","doi":"10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.34.2300503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundVaccine uptake differs between social groups. Mobile vaccination units (MV-units) were deployed in the Netherlands by municipal health services in neighbourhoods with low uptake of COVID-19 vaccines.AimWe aimed to evaluate the impact of MV-units on vaccine uptake in neighbourhoods with low vaccine uptake.MethodsWe used the Dutch national-level registry of COVID-19 vaccinations (CIMS) and MV-unit deployment registrations containing observations in 253 neighbourhoods where MV-units were deployed and 890 contiguous neighbourhoods (total observations: 88,543 neighbourhood-days). A negative binomial regression with neighbourhood-specific temporal effects using splines was used to study the effect.ResultsDuring deployment, the increase in daily vaccination rate in targeted neighbourhoods ranged from a factor 2.0 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.8-2.2) in urbanised neighbourhoods to 14.5 (95% CI: 11.6-18.0) in rural neighbourhoods. The effects were larger in neighbourhoods with more voters for the Dutch conservative Reformed Christian party but smaller in neighbourhoods with a higher proportion of people with non-western migration backgrounds. The absolute increase in uptake over the complete intervention period ranged from 0.22 percentage points (95% CI: 0.18-0.26) in the most urbanised neighbourhoods to 0.33 percentage point (95% CI: 0.28-0.37) in rural neighbourhoods.ConclusionDeployment of MV-units increased daily vaccination rate, particularly in rural neighbourhoods, with longer travel distance to permanent vaccination locations. This public health intervention shows promise to reduce geographic and social health inequalities, but more proactive and long-term deployment is required to identify its potential to substantially contribute to overall vaccination rates at country level.</p>","PeriodicalId":12161,"journal":{"name":"Eurosurveillance","volume":"29 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurosurveillance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.34.2300503","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundVaccine uptake differs between social groups. Mobile vaccination units (MV-units) were deployed in the Netherlands by municipal health services in neighbourhoods with low uptake of COVID-19 vaccines.AimWe aimed to evaluate the impact of MV-units on vaccine uptake in neighbourhoods with low vaccine uptake.MethodsWe used the Dutch national-level registry of COVID-19 vaccinations (CIMS) and MV-unit deployment registrations containing observations in 253 neighbourhoods where MV-units were deployed and 890 contiguous neighbourhoods (total observations: 88,543 neighbourhood-days). A negative binomial regression with neighbourhood-specific temporal effects using splines was used to study the effect.ResultsDuring deployment, the increase in daily vaccination rate in targeted neighbourhoods ranged from a factor 2.0 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.8-2.2) in urbanised neighbourhoods to 14.5 (95% CI: 11.6-18.0) in rural neighbourhoods. The effects were larger in neighbourhoods with more voters for the Dutch conservative Reformed Christian party but smaller in neighbourhoods with a higher proportion of people with non-western migration backgrounds. The absolute increase in uptake over the complete intervention period ranged from 0.22 percentage points (95% CI: 0.18-0.26) in the most urbanised neighbourhoods to 0.33 percentage point (95% CI: 0.28-0.37) in rural neighbourhoods.ConclusionDeployment of MV-units increased daily vaccination rate, particularly in rural neighbourhoods, with longer travel distance to permanent vaccination locations. This public health intervention shows promise to reduce geographic and social health inequalities, but more proactive and long-term deployment is required to identify its potential to substantially contribute to overall vaccination rates at country level.

流动疫苗接种单位提高覆盖率较低地区的 COVID-19 疫苗接种率:利用全国登记数据进行的邻近地区内分析,荷兰,2021 年 9 月至 12 月。
背景不同社会群体的疫苗接种率不同。在荷兰,市政卫生服务机构在 COVID-19 疫苗接种率较低的社区部署了流动疫苗接种单位(MV-units)。方法我们使用了荷兰国家级 COVID-19 疫苗接种登记表(CIMS)和 MV 单位部署登记表,其中包含对部署了 MV 单位的 253 个社区和 890 个毗邻社区的观察结果(总观察结果:88543 个社区日)。结果在部署期间,目标社区的每日疫苗接种率提高了 2.0 倍(95% 置信区间 (CI):1.8-2.2),农村社区提高了 14.5 倍(95% 置信区间 (CI):11.6-18.0)。在荷兰保守派改革基督教党选民较多的社区,这种影响较大,但在非西方移民背景人口比例较高的社区,这种影响较小。在整个干预期间,接种率的绝对增幅从最城市化社区的 0.22 个百分点(95% CI:0.18-0.26)到农村社区的 0.33 个百分点(95% CI:0.28-0.37)不等。这一公共卫生干预措施有望减少地域和社会卫生不平等,但需要更积极、更长期的部署,以确定其在国家层面大幅提高整体疫苗接种率的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eurosurveillance
Eurosurveillance INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
32.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
430
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Eurosurveillance is a European peer-reviewed journal focusing on the epidemiology, surveillance, prevention, and control of communicable diseases relevant to Europe.It is a weekly online journal, with 50 issues per year published on Thursdays. The journal includes short rapid communications, in-depth research articles, surveillance reports, reviews, and perspective papers. It excels in timely publication of authoritative papers on ongoing outbreaks or other public health events. Under special circumstances when current events need to be urgently communicated to readers for rapid public health action, e-alerts can be released outside of the regular publishing schedule. Additionally, topical compilations and special issues may be provided in PDF format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信