Factor Structure and Internal Consistency of the National Alzheimer Coordinating Center's Uniform Data Set Version 3 Neuropsychological Test Battery (UDSNB 3.0): The Nigeria Sample.
Valentine Ucheagwu, Chiamaka Odilora, Rita Ugokwe-Joseph, Bruno Giordani
{"title":"Factor Structure and Internal Consistency of the National Alzheimer Coordinating Center's Uniform Data Set Version 3 Neuropsychological Test Battery (UDSNB 3.0): The Nigeria Sample.","authors":"Valentine Ucheagwu, Chiamaka Odilora, Rita Ugokwe-Joseph, Bruno Giordani","doi":"10.1097/WAD.0000000000000630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Construct validation of cognitive batteries across Africa is imperative to understanding dementia in the region. We examined construct validity and internal consistency of the neuropsychological battery of Uniform Data Set version 3 (UDSNB 3.0) of the Alzheimer Coordinating Center in Nigeria older adults.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Three hundred forty-nine (220 females; age: 65 to 85) community dwellers were recruited. UDSNB 3.0 with 12 subscales were used to measure cognition. Two sets of data were collected. First was for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and second was confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Four models were specified for CFA.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>EFA principal axis factor with varimax rotation yielded 4 factors: Executive function, memory, visual-spatial ability, and processing speed. Four CFA were performed based on 4 specified models, with only model 3 showing good model fit: CMIN/DF=2.13; confirmatory fit index=0.94; root mean square error of approximation=0.07. Model 3 had 5 latent variables: working memory, language, verbal memory, visual-spatial ability, and processing speed. UDSNB 3.0 had an overall Cronbach alpha of 0.73, suggesting strong internal reliability with ANOVA model F134,1619=183.65 significant at P<0.001 level of testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study showed that UDSNB 3.0 has construct validity and good internal consistency in our older adult population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7679,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","volume":"38 3","pages":"265-270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000630","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Construct validation of cognitive batteries across Africa is imperative to understanding dementia in the region. We examined construct validity and internal consistency of the neuropsychological battery of Uniform Data Set version 3 (UDSNB 3.0) of the Alzheimer Coordinating Center in Nigeria older adults.
Method: Three hundred forty-nine (220 females; age: 65 to 85) community dwellers were recruited. UDSNB 3.0 with 12 subscales were used to measure cognition. Two sets of data were collected. First was for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and second was confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Four models were specified for CFA.
Result: EFA principal axis factor with varimax rotation yielded 4 factors: Executive function, memory, visual-spatial ability, and processing speed. Four CFA were performed based on 4 specified models, with only model 3 showing good model fit: CMIN/DF=2.13; confirmatory fit index=0.94; root mean square error of approximation=0.07. Model 3 had 5 latent variables: working memory, language, verbal memory, visual-spatial ability, and processing speed. UDSNB 3.0 had an overall Cronbach alpha of 0.73, suggesting strong internal reliability with ANOVA model F134,1619=183.65 significant at P<0.001 level of testing.
Conclusions: Our study showed that UDSNB 3.0 has construct validity and good internal consistency in our older adult population.
期刊介绍:
Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of clinicians and researchers, with primary emphasis on Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. The journal publishes original articles emphasizing research in humans including epidemiologic studies, clinical trials and experimental studies, studies of diagnosis and biomarkers, as well as research on the health of persons with dementia and their caregivers. The scientific portion of the journal is augmented by reviews of the current literature, concepts, conjectures, and hypotheses in dementia, brief reports, and letters to the editor.