Fretting-corrosion at the Implant–Abutment Interface Simulating Clinically Relevant Conditions

Abstract

Objective

Implant treatment is provided to individuals with normal, idealized masticatory forces and also to patients with parafunctional habits such as grinding, clenching, and bruxing. Dental erosion is a common increasing condition and is reported to affect 32 % of adults, increasing with age. This oral environment is conducive to tribocorrosion and the potential loss of materials from the implant surfaces and interfaces with prosthetic components. Although several fretting-corrosion studies have been reported, until now, no study has simulated clinically relevant micromotion. Therefore, our aim is to investigate fretting-corrosion using our new micro-fretting corrosion system, simulating clinical conditions with 5 µm motion at the implant-abutment interface under various occlusal loads and acidic exposures.

Methods

We simulated four conditions in an oral environment by varying the contact load (83 N and 233 N) and pH levels (3 and 6.5). The commonly used dental implant material, Grade IV titanium, and abutment material Zirconia (ZrO₂)/ Grade IV titanium were selected as testing couple materials. Artificial saliva was employed to represent an oral environment. In addition, a standard tribocorrosion protocol was followed, and the pin was controlled to oscillate on the disk with an amplitude of 5 $\mu$m during the mastication stage. After the testing, 3D profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) were utilized to analyze the worn surfaces. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was also used to measure the metal ion release.

Results

Energy ratios were below 0.2, indicating a fretting regime of partial slip for all groups. Open-circuit potential (OCP) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were analyzed to compare the electrochemical behavior among groups. As a result, corrosive damage was observed to be more in the Ti4- Ti4 groups than in Zr-Ti4 ones, whereas more mechanical damage was found in the Zr-Ti4 groups than in the Ti4-Ti4 groups. Possible mechanisms were proposed in the discussion to explain these findings.

Significance

The results observed from this study might be helpful to clinicians with implant selection. For example, for patients with bruxism, a titanium implant paired with a titanium abutment may be preferable, while patients with GERD may benefit more from a titanium implant paired with a zirconia abutment.