Is electrical cardioversion independently associated with infarcts on brain magnetic resonance imaging or clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Annina Stauber MD , Andreas Müller MD , Nikki Rommers PhD , Stefanie Aeschbacher PhD , Leo H. Bonati MD , David Conen MD, MPH , Tobias Reichlin MD , Peter Ammann MD , Nicolas Rodondi MD , Marcello DiValentino MD , Giorgio Moschovitis MD , Helena Aebersold PhD , Jürg Hans Beer MD , Tim Sinnecker MD , Raban V. Jeger MD , David J. Kurz MD , Claudia Liedtke BSN , Michael Kühne MD , Stefan Osswald MD , Alain M. Bernheim MD
{"title":"Is electrical cardioversion independently associated with infarcts on brain magnetic resonance imaging or clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation?","authors":"Annina Stauber MD , Andreas Müller MD , Nikki Rommers PhD , Stefanie Aeschbacher PhD , Leo H. Bonati MD , David Conen MD, MPH , Tobias Reichlin MD , Peter Ammann MD , Nicolas Rodondi MD , Marcello DiValentino MD , Giorgio Moschovitis MD , Helena Aebersold PhD , Jürg Hans Beer MD , Tim Sinnecker MD , Raban V. Jeger MD , David J. Kurz MD , Claudia Liedtke BSN , Michael Kühne MD , Stefan Osswald MD , Alain M. Bernheim MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.06.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Electrical cardioversion (ECV) is frequently performed in symptomatic atrial fibrillation.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the association of ECV with infarcts on brain magnetic resonance imaging (bMRI) and clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Swiss Atrial Fibrillation Cohort Study included 2386 patients; 1731 patients were evaluated by bMRI. ECVs were recorded by questionnaire. Patients were assigned to categories by number of ECVs performed before enrollment (0, 1, ≥2). A bMRI study was conducted at baseline and after 2 years (n = 1227) and analyzed for large noncortical or cortical infarcts and small noncortical infarcts. Clinical outcomes were recorded during follow-up. Associations of ECV and outcome measures were assessed by multivariate analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was no independent association between the number of ECVs and infarct prevalence (large noncortical or cortical infarcts and small noncortical infarcts) on baseline bMRI (ECV 1 vs 0: odds ratio [OR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.68–1.24]; ECV ≥2 vs 0: OR, 1.04 [0.72–1.44]) or between ECVs performed during follow-up and new infarcts on bMRI at 2 years (OR, 1.46 [0.54–3.31]). ECVs were not associated with overt stroke or transient ischemic attack (ECV 1 vs 0: hazard ratio [HR], 1.36 [0.88–2.10]; ECV ≥2 vs 0: HR, 1.53 [0.94–2.48]), hospitalization for heart failure (ECV 1 vs 0: HR, 1.06 [0.82–1.37]; ECV ≥2 vs 0: HR, 1.03 [0.77–1.38]), or death (ECV 1 vs 0: HR, 0.90 [0.70–1.15]; ECV ≥2 vs 0: HR, 0.91 [0.69–1.20]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There was no association between ECV performed before enrollment and cerebral infarcts on baseline bMRI or between ECV performed during follow-up and new infarcts at 2 years. Moreover, ECV was not associated with clinical events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":"22 1","pages":"Pages 6-12"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527124027395","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Electrical cardioversion (ECV) is frequently performed in symptomatic atrial fibrillation.
Objective
This study aimed to assess the association of ECV with infarcts on brain magnetic resonance imaging (bMRI) and clinical outcomes.
Methods
The Swiss Atrial Fibrillation Cohort Study included 2386 patients; 1731 patients were evaluated by bMRI. ECVs were recorded by questionnaire. Patients were assigned to categories by number of ECVs performed before enrollment (0, 1, ≥2). A bMRI study was conducted at baseline and after 2 years (n = 1227) and analyzed for large noncortical or cortical infarcts and small noncortical infarcts. Clinical outcomes were recorded during follow-up. Associations of ECV and outcome measures were assessed by multivariate analyses.
Results
There was no independent association between the number of ECVs and infarct prevalence (large noncortical or cortical infarcts and small noncortical infarcts) on baseline bMRI (ECV 1 vs 0: odds ratio [OR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.68–1.24]; ECV ≥2 vs 0: OR, 1.04 [0.72–1.44]) or between ECVs performed during follow-up and new infarcts on bMRI at 2 years (OR, 1.46 [0.54–3.31]). ECVs were not associated with overt stroke or transient ischemic attack (ECV 1 vs 0: hazard ratio [HR], 1.36 [0.88–2.10]; ECV ≥2 vs 0: HR, 1.53 [0.94–2.48]), hospitalization for heart failure (ECV 1 vs 0: HR, 1.06 [0.82–1.37]; ECV ≥2 vs 0: HR, 1.03 [0.77–1.38]), or death (ECV 1 vs 0: HR, 0.90 [0.70–1.15]; ECV ≥2 vs 0: HR, 0.91 [0.69–1.20]).
Conclusion
There was no association between ECV performed before enrollment and cerebral infarcts on baseline bMRI or between ECV performed during follow-up and new infarcts at 2 years. Moreover, ECV was not associated with clinical events.
期刊介绍:
HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability.
HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community.
The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.