Tuning effect in time-lapse seismic inversion for CO2 plume monitoring at Sleipner field

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Saeed Izadian
{"title":"Tuning effect in time-lapse seismic inversion for CO2 plume monitoring at Sleipner field","authors":"Saeed Izadian","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over 20 million tons of CO<sub>2</sub>‌ have been injected into the sandy Utsira formation of the Sleipner field in the North Sea basin. The thin layering of sands, CO<sub>2</sub>-saturated sands, and intra-formation thin shales cause interference effects in the seismic response of the monitor surveys. Initial analysis of the amplitude change suggests over 60 % change in the relative acoustic impedance of the reservoir between the 1996 and 2010 surveys. This study follows a multi-stage inversion scheme applied to time-lapse seismic monitoring of the Sleipner field. At each stage, the errors and uncertainties caused by noise and tuning are deeply analyzed. Time-shift estimation from seismic data shows spurious features caused by tuning, specifically using the window-based methods. The time-strain inversion builds a low-frequency initial model for the subsequent model-based inversion but is contaminated by remnants of noise and interference. The synthetic wedge modelling and analysis provides the origins and severity of the tuning error in time-shift and time-strain estimations at the Sleipner field. The model-based inversion removes noise and injects high-frequency components into the results, improving the outcome of time-strain inversion. However, it fails to fully eliminate the tuning imprints and leaves strong traces of error on the results. Afterward, the time-lapse Bayesian seismic inversion slightly adjusts the outcome and shows how deep the influence of interference effect on the time-lapse inversion is. In addition, the complementary discussion on rock physical models in estimating the saturation changes highlights how the tuning error can lead to flawed quantitative interpretation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 104224"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001671/pdfft?md5=75b70438f3bee9bc311c00dde59ca420&pid=1-s2.0-S1750583624001671-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001671","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over 20 million tons of CO2‌ have been injected into the sandy Utsira formation of the Sleipner field in the North Sea basin. The thin layering of sands, CO2-saturated sands, and intra-formation thin shales cause interference effects in the seismic response of the monitor surveys. Initial analysis of the amplitude change suggests over 60 % change in the relative acoustic impedance of the reservoir between the 1996 and 2010 surveys. This study follows a multi-stage inversion scheme applied to time-lapse seismic monitoring of the Sleipner field. At each stage, the errors and uncertainties caused by noise and tuning are deeply analyzed. Time-shift estimation from seismic data shows spurious features caused by tuning, specifically using the window-based methods. The time-strain inversion builds a low-frequency initial model for the subsequent model-based inversion but is contaminated by remnants of noise and interference. The synthetic wedge modelling and analysis provides the origins and severity of the tuning error in time-shift and time-strain estimations at the Sleipner field. The model-based inversion removes noise and injects high-frequency components into the results, improving the outcome of time-strain inversion. However, it fails to fully eliminate the tuning imprints and leaves strong traces of error on the results. Afterward, the time-lapse Bayesian seismic inversion slightly adjusts the outcome and shows how deep the influence of interference effect on the time-lapse inversion is. In addition, the complementary discussion on rock physical models in estimating the saturation changes highlights how the tuning error can lead to flawed quantitative interpretation.

用于斯莱普纳油田二氧化碳羽流监测的延时地震反演中的调谐效应
向北海盆地斯莱普纳油田的乌齐拉砂质地层注入了 2000 多万吨二氧化碳。砂层、二氧化碳饱和砂层和层内薄页岩的薄层结构对监测勘探的地震响应产生了干扰效应。对振幅变化的初步分析表明,在 1996 年和 2010 年的勘测之间,储层的相对声阻抗发生了超过 60% 的变化。本研究采用多阶段反演方案,适用于斯莱普纳油田的延时地震监测。在每个阶段,都深入分析了噪声和调谐造成的误差和不确定性。通过地震数据进行时移估计,特别是使用基于窗口的方法,显示了由调谐引起的虚假特征。时间应变反演为后续基于模型的反演建立了低频初始模型,但受到噪声和干扰残余的污染。合成楔建模和分析提供了斯莱普纳油气田时移和时变估算中调谐误差的来源和严重程度。基于模型的反演可以消除噪声,并将高频成分注入结果中,从而改善时间应变反演的结果。然而,它未能完全消除调谐印记,并在结果中留下了强烈的误差痕迹。随后,延时贝叶斯地震反演略微调整了结果,说明干扰效应对延时反演的影响有多深。此外,在估算饱和度变化时对岩石物理模型的补充讨论突出了调谐误差如何导致错误的定量解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信