‘Why did nobody ask us?’: A mixed-methods co-produced study in the United Kingdom exploring why some children are unvaccinated or vaccinated late

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
{"title":"‘Why did nobody ask us?’: A mixed-methods co-produced study in the United Kingdom exploring why some children are unvaccinated or vaccinated late","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Childhood vaccine uptake in the United Kingdom (UK) is sub-optimal leading to outbreaks of preventable diseases. We aimed to explore UK parents' perspectives on why some children are unvaccinated or vaccinated late.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We undertook a mixed-methods, co-production study involving a survey using a questionnaire followed by focus groups. We partnered with The Mosaic Community Trust (Mosaic) who are based in a more deprived, ethnically diverse, low vaccine uptake area of London. Targeted recruitment to complete the questionnaire (either on paper or online) was done through Mosaic, community networks and social media promotion. We collected demographic data alongside parents' views on routine childhood vaccination, their vaccine decisions, and experiences of accessing childhood vaccine appointments We report descriptive findings from the questionnaire and thematic analysis of free-text questionnaire answers and focus groups guided by the COM-B model of Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between June–October 2022, 518 parents were surveyed of whom 25% (<em>n</em> = 130), were from ethnic minorities (13%, <em>n</em> = 68-unknown ethnicity). In 2023 we held four focus groups with 22 parents (10 from ethnic minorities). Only 15% (<em>n</em> = 78) parents had delayed or refused a vaccine for their child. A quarter of parents felt they had not been given enough information nor an opportunity to ask questions before their children's vaccinations. Inconsistent reminders and difficulties booking or attending appointments impacted vaccine uptake with negative experiences influencing future vaccine decisions. Parents had mixed views on vaccinations being given in different locations and wanted trusted health professionals to vaccinate their children.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>To reverse declining vaccine uptake and prevent future outbreaks it needs to be easier for UK parents to speak to health professionals to answer their childhood vaccine questions, alongside simplified booking systems and easier access to routine childhood vaccine appointments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24008351/pdfft?md5=7cb7e4cba7935d316fca081ea2be3315&pid=1-s2.0-S0264410X24008351-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24008351","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Childhood vaccine uptake in the United Kingdom (UK) is sub-optimal leading to outbreaks of preventable diseases. We aimed to explore UK parents' perspectives on why some children are unvaccinated or vaccinated late.

Methods

We undertook a mixed-methods, co-production study involving a survey using a questionnaire followed by focus groups. We partnered with The Mosaic Community Trust (Mosaic) who are based in a more deprived, ethnically diverse, low vaccine uptake area of London. Targeted recruitment to complete the questionnaire (either on paper or online) was done through Mosaic, community networks and social media promotion. We collected demographic data alongside parents' views on routine childhood vaccination, their vaccine decisions, and experiences of accessing childhood vaccine appointments We report descriptive findings from the questionnaire and thematic analysis of free-text questionnaire answers and focus groups guided by the COM-B model of Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation.

Results

Between June–October 2022, 518 parents were surveyed of whom 25% (n = 130), were from ethnic minorities (13%, n = 68-unknown ethnicity). In 2023 we held four focus groups with 22 parents (10 from ethnic minorities). Only 15% (n = 78) parents had delayed or refused a vaccine for their child. A quarter of parents felt they had not been given enough information nor an opportunity to ask questions before their children's vaccinations. Inconsistent reminders and difficulties booking or attending appointments impacted vaccine uptake with negative experiences influencing future vaccine decisions. Parents had mixed views on vaccinations being given in different locations and wanted trusted health professionals to vaccinate their children.

Conclusion

To reverse declining vaccine uptake and prevent future outbreaks it needs to be easier for UK parents to speak to health professionals to answer their childhood vaccine questions, alongside simplified booking systems and easier access to routine childhood vaccine appointments.

为什么没人问我们?在英国开展的一项混合方法共同研究,探讨为什么有些儿童没有接种疫苗或迟迟才接种疫苗
英国儿童的疫苗接种率不尽如人意,导致了可预防疾病的爆发。我们旨在探讨英国家长对一些儿童未接种疫苗或延迟接种疫苗的原因的看法。方法我们开展了一项混合方法的共同生产研究,包括使用问卷进行调查,然后进行焦点小组讨论。我们与马赛克社区信托基金会(Mosaic)合作,该基金会位于伦敦一个较为贫困、种族多元化、疫苗接种率较低的地区。我们通过 Mosaic、社区网络和社交媒体宣传,有针对性地招募填写问卷(纸质或在线)的人员。我们报告了问卷调查的描述性结果,以及在能力、机会和动机 COM-B 模型指导下对自由文本问卷答案和焦点小组进行的主题分析。结果在 2022 年 6 月至 10 月期间,我们对 518 名家长进行了调查,其中 25% 的家长(n = 130)来自少数民族(13%,n = 68 - 族裔不明)。2023 年,我们举行了四次焦点小组会议,共有 22 名家长参加(10 名来自少数族裔)。只有 15%(n = 78)的家长推迟或拒绝为其子女接种疫苗。四分之一的家长认为,在孩子接种疫苗前,他们没有得到足够的信息,也没有机会提问。不连贯的提醒以及预约或就诊困难影响了疫苗接种率,负面经历影响了今后的疫苗接种决定。为了扭转疫苗接种率下降的趋势并预防未来的疫情爆发,英国的家长需要更方便地与卫生专业人员交谈,以解答他们的儿童疫苗问题,同时简化预约系统并方便他们预约常规儿童疫苗接种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信