Evaluation of myocardial work and exercise capacity in patients recovered from the severe form of COVID-19

IF 1.9 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Thiago Lins Fagundes de Sousa , Allan Robson Kluser Sales , Juliana Góes Martins Fagundes , Luis Fábio Barbosa Botelho , Francis Ribeiro de Souza , Guilherme Wesley Fonseca , André Luis Pereira de Albuquerque , Marcelo Dantas Tavares de Melo , Maria-Janieire de Nazaré Nunes Alves
{"title":"Evaluation of myocardial work and exercise capacity in patients recovered from the severe form of COVID-19","authors":"Thiago Lins Fagundes de Sousa ,&nbsp;Allan Robson Kluser Sales ,&nbsp;Juliana Góes Martins Fagundes ,&nbsp;Luis Fábio Barbosa Botelho ,&nbsp;Francis Ribeiro de Souza ,&nbsp;Guilherme Wesley Fonseca ,&nbsp;André Luis Pereira de Albuquerque ,&nbsp;Marcelo Dantas Tavares de Melo ,&nbsp;Maria-Janieire de Nazaré Nunes Alves","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The impact of COVID-19 goes beyond its acute form and can lead to the persistence of symptoms and the emergence of systemic disorders, defined as long-term COVID.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a cross-sectional study that included patients over 18 years of age who recovered from the severe form of COVID-19 at least 60 days after their discharge. Patients and controls were enrolled to undergo transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) using a more sensitive tool, myocardial work, in combination with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 52 patients and 31 controls were enrolled. Significant differences were observed in ejection fraction (LVEF; 62 ± 7 vs. 66 ± 6 %; p = 0.007), global longitudinal strain (LVGLS; −18.7 ± 2.6 vs. −20.4 ± 1.4 %; p = 0.001), myocardial wasted work (GWW; 152 ± 81 vs. 101 ± 54 mmHg; p = 0.003), and myocardial work efficiency (GWE; 93 ± 3 vs. 95 ± 2 %; p = 0.002). We found a significant difference in peak VO<sub>2</sub> (24.4 ± 5.4 vs. 33.4 ± 8.8 mL/kg/min; p &lt; 0.001), heart rate (160 ± 14 vs. 176 ± 11 bpm; p &lt; 0.001), ventilation (84.6 ± 22.6 vs. 104.9 ± 27.0 L/min; p &lt; 0.001), OUES% (89 ± 16 vs. 102 ± 22 %; p = 0.002), T ½ (120.3 ± 32 vs. 97.6 ± 27 s; p = 0.002) and HRR at 2 min (−36 ± 11 vs. −43 ± 13 bpm; p = 0.010).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings revealed an increased wasted work, with lower myocardial efficiency, significantly reduced aerobic exercise capacity, and abnormal heart rate response during recovery, which may be related to previously described late symptoms. The reduction in functional capacity during physical exercise is partly associated with a decrease in resting myocardial work efficiency. These findings strongly indicate the need to determine whether these manifestations persist in the long term and their impact on cardiovascular health and quality of life in COVID-19 survivors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29726,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 200324"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487524000898/pdfft?md5=b916ffbd5011e23ab681a09d6aba116a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772487524000898-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487524000898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The impact of COVID-19 goes beyond its acute form and can lead to the persistence of symptoms and the emergence of systemic disorders, defined as long-term COVID.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional study that included patients over 18 years of age who recovered from the severe form of COVID-19 at least 60 days after their discharge. Patients and controls were enrolled to undergo transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) using a more sensitive tool, myocardial work, in combination with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET).

Results

A total of 52 patients and 31 controls were enrolled. Significant differences were observed in ejection fraction (LVEF; 62 ± 7 vs. 66 ± 6 %; p = 0.007), global longitudinal strain (LVGLS; −18.7 ± 2.6 vs. −20.4 ± 1.4 %; p = 0.001), myocardial wasted work (GWW; 152 ± 81 vs. 101 ± 54 mmHg; p = 0.003), and myocardial work efficiency (GWE; 93 ± 3 vs. 95 ± 2 %; p = 0.002). We found a significant difference in peak VO2 (24.4 ± 5.4 vs. 33.4 ± 8.8 mL/kg/min; p < 0.001), heart rate (160 ± 14 vs. 176 ± 11 bpm; p < 0.001), ventilation (84.6 ± 22.6 vs. 104.9 ± 27.0 L/min; p < 0.001), OUES% (89 ± 16 vs. 102 ± 22 %; p = 0.002), T ½ (120.3 ± 32 vs. 97.6 ± 27 s; p = 0.002) and HRR at 2 min (−36 ± 11 vs. −43 ± 13 bpm; p = 0.010).

Conclusion

Our findings revealed an increased wasted work, with lower myocardial efficiency, significantly reduced aerobic exercise capacity, and abnormal heart rate response during recovery, which may be related to previously described late symptoms. The reduction in functional capacity during physical exercise is partly associated with a decrease in resting myocardial work efficiency. These findings strongly indicate the need to determine whether these manifestations persist in the long term and their impact on cardiovascular health and quality of life in COVID-19 survivors.

评估 COVID-19 重型患者的心肌工作和运动能力
背景COVID-19的影响超出了其急性形式,可导致症状持续存在并出现全身性疾病,即长期COVID.方法我们进行了一项横断面研究,纳入了出院后至少60天从严重COVID-19中康复的18岁以上患者。患者和对照组均接受了经胸超声心动图(TTE)检查,并结合心肺运动测试(CPET)使用了一种更敏感的工具--心肌功。在射血分数(LVEF;62 ± 7 vs. 66 ± 6 %;p = 0.007)、整体纵向应变(LVGLS;-18.7 ± 2.6 vs. -20.4 ± 1.4 %;p = 0.001)、心肌耗功(GWW;152 ± 81 vs. 101 ± 54 mmHg;p = 0.003)和心肌工作效率(GWE;93 ± 3 vs. 95 ± 2 %;p = 0.002)方面观察到显著差异。我们发现在峰值 VO2(24.4 ± 5.4 vs. 33.4 ± 8.8 mL/kg/min;p < 0.001)、心率(160 ± 14 vs. 176 ± 11 bpm;p < 0.001)、通气量(84.6 ± 22.6 vs. 104.9 ± 27.0 L/min;p <;0.001)、OUES%(89 ± 16 vs. 102 ± 22 %;p = 0.002)、T ½(120.3 ± 32 vs. 97.6 ± 27 s;p = 0.结论我们的研究结果表明,心肌效率降低,有氧运动能力显著下降,恢复期心率反应异常,这些可能与之前描述的晚期症状有关。体育锻炼时功能能力的降低部分与静息心肌工作效率的降低有关。这些发现有力地表明,有必要确定这些表现是否会长期存在,以及它们对 COVID-19 幸存者的心血管健康和生活质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信