[Prevention of Spontaneous Premature Birth With Cervical Pessary: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study].

Q3 Medicine
Zhiwei Xue, Yana Liu, Ke Wang, Linyi Yang, Jie Ruan, Xinghui Liu, Shu Zhou
{"title":"[Prevention of Spontaneous Premature Birth With Cervical Pessary: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study].","authors":"Zhiwei Xue, Yana Liu, Ke Wang, Linyi Yang, Jie Ruan, Xinghui Liu, Shu Zhou","doi":"10.12182/20240760501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study and compare the clinical effects of cervical pessary and progesterone for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnant women with a short cervical length (CL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a prospective cohort study. A total of 148 pregnant women with CL≤25 mm, as determined by ultrasound examination performed before 28 weeks of pregnancy, were included in the study. All subjects were admitted to West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University between August 2020 and December 2022. According to their treatment plans, the pregnant women were divided into a cervical pessary group (<i>n</i>=55) and a progesterone group (<i>n</i>=93). Spontaneous preterm birth before 37 weeks of pregnancy was defined as the main outcome index. Preterm birth (abortion) or spontaneous preterm birth (abortion) before 37, 34, 32, 30, and 28 weeks of pregnancy, mean extended gestational age, neonatal morbidity, and neonatal mortality were the secondary outcome indicators. The pregnancy outcomes and the neonatal outcomes of the two groups were compared and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of preterm birth (including iatrogenic preterm birth, spontaneous preterm birth, and abortion) before 37, 34, 32, 30, and 28 weeks between the cervical pessary group and the progesterone group. When iatrogenic preterm birth was excluded, the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth before 37 weeks was lower in the cervical pessary group (23.6%) than that in the progesterone group (41.9%), with the difference between the two groups being statistically significant (<i>P</i>=0.024). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth (including miscarriage) before 34, 32, 30, and 28 weeks. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of neonatal morbidity, the rate of transfer to the neonatal care unit after birth, and the neonatal mortality rate between the two groups. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that treatment with cervical pessary was a protective factor for spontaneous preterm birth before 37 weeks compared to progesterone therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using cervical pessary to prevent spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnant women with a short cervical length in the second trimester can significantly reduce the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth before 37 weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":39321,"journal":{"name":"四川大学学报(医学版)","volume":"55 4","pages":"1007-1013"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"四川大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12182/20240760501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study and compare the clinical effects of cervical pessary and progesterone for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnant women with a short cervical length (CL).

Methods: This study was a prospective cohort study. A total of 148 pregnant women with CL≤25 mm, as determined by ultrasound examination performed before 28 weeks of pregnancy, were included in the study. All subjects were admitted to West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University between August 2020 and December 2022. According to their treatment plans, the pregnant women were divided into a cervical pessary group (n=55) and a progesterone group (n=93). Spontaneous preterm birth before 37 weeks of pregnancy was defined as the main outcome index. Preterm birth (abortion) or spontaneous preterm birth (abortion) before 37, 34, 32, 30, and 28 weeks of pregnancy, mean extended gestational age, neonatal morbidity, and neonatal mortality were the secondary outcome indicators. The pregnancy outcomes and the neonatal outcomes of the two groups were compared and statistically analyzed.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of preterm birth (including iatrogenic preterm birth, spontaneous preterm birth, and abortion) before 37, 34, 32, 30, and 28 weeks between the cervical pessary group and the progesterone group. When iatrogenic preterm birth was excluded, the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth before 37 weeks was lower in the cervical pessary group (23.6%) than that in the progesterone group (41.9%), with the difference between the two groups being statistically significant (P=0.024). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth (including miscarriage) before 34, 32, 30, and 28 weeks. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of neonatal morbidity, the rate of transfer to the neonatal care unit after birth, and the neonatal mortality rate between the two groups. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that treatment with cervical pessary was a protective factor for spontaneous preterm birth before 37 weeks compared to progesterone therapy.

Conclusion: Using cervical pessary to prevent spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnant women with a short cervical length in the second trimester can significantly reduce the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth before 37 weeks.

[宫颈栓剂预防自发性早产:单中心前瞻性队列研究]。
目的研究并比较宫颈栓剂和黄体酮对宫颈长度(CL)过短的单胎孕妇预防早产的临床效果:本研究是一项前瞻性队列研究。方法:本研究为前瞻性队列研究,共纳入了 148 名妊娠 28 周前通过超声检查确定宫颈长度(CL)≤25 mm 的孕妇。所有研究对象均于 2020 年 8 月至 2022 年 12 月期间入住四川大学华西第二医院。根据治疗方案,孕妇被分为宫颈栓剂组(55 人)和黄体酮组(93 人)。妊娠 37 周前的自发性早产被定义为主要结果指标。妊娠 37、34、32、30 和 28 周前的早产(流产)或自然早产(流产)、平均延长胎龄、新生儿发病率和新生儿死亡率为次要结局指标。对两组孕妇的妊娠结局和新生儿结局进行了比较和统计分析:宫颈栓剂组和黄体酮组在 37、34、32、30 和 28 周前的早产(包括先天性早产、自然早产和流产)发生率差异无统计学意义。排除先天性早产后,宫颈栓剂组 37 周前自发性早产的发生率(23.6%)低于黄体酮组(41.9%),两组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.024)。在 34 周、32 周、30 周和 28 周之前,自然早产(包括流产)的发生率没有明显的统计学差异。两组新生儿发病率、出生后转入新生儿监护室的比率和新生儿死亡率在统计学上无明显差异。多变量逻辑分析显示,与黄体酮疗法相比,宫颈栓塞疗法是37周前自发性早产的保护因素:结论:对于宫颈长度较短的单胎孕妇,在怀孕后三个月使用宫颈栓剂预防自发性早产可显著降低37周前自发性早产的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
四川大学学报(医学版)
四川大学学报(医学版) Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8695
期刊介绍: "Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Edition)" is a comprehensive medical academic journal sponsored by Sichuan University, a higher education institution directly under the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. It was founded in 1959 and was originally named "Journal of Sichuan Medical College". In 1986, it was renamed "Journal of West China University of Medical Sciences". In 2003, it was renamed "Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Edition)" (bimonthly). "Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Edition)" is a Chinese core journal and a Chinese authoritative academic journal (RCCSE). It is included in the retrieval systems such as China Science and Technology Papers and Citation Database (CSTPCD), China Science Citation Database (CSCD) (core version), Peking University Library's "Overview of Chinese Core Journals", the U.S. "Index Medica" (IM/Medline), the U.S. "PubMed Central" (PMC), the U.S. "Biological Abstracts" (BA), the U.S. "Chemical Abstracts" (CA), the U.S. EBSCO, the Netherlands "Abstracts and Citation Database" (Scopus), the Japan Science and Technology Agency Database (JST), the Russian "Abstract Magazine", the Chinese Biomedical Literature CD-ROM Database (CBMdisc), the Chinese Biomedical Periodical Literature Database (CMCC), the China Academic Journal Network Full-text Database (CNKI), the Chinese Academic Journal (CD-ROM Edition), and the Wanfang Data-Digital Journal Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信