"SafetyNet": Evaluation of a Recovery Coach and Paramedic Intervention Following Naloxone Resuscitation From an Opioid Overdose.

Daniel Joseph, Carolyn Brokowski, Gail D'Onofrio, Sandy Bogucki, Joanne McGovern, Rebecca Allen, James Dziura, David C Cone, Michael V Pantalon
{"title":"\"SafetyNet\": Evaluation of a Recovery Coach and Paramedic Intervention Following Naloxone Resuscitation From an Opioid Overdose.","authors":"Daniel Joseph, Carolyn Brokowski, Gail D'Onofrio, Sandy Bogucki, Joanne McGovern, Rebecca Allen, James Dziura, David C Cone, Michael V Pantalon","doi":"10.1177/29767342241266412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine has proven efficacy, but many patients are reluctant to begin this treatment. This study evaluated SafetyNet, a program using a 2-person, recovery coach and paramedic (RCP) intervention postoverdose to reduce subsequent opioid overdose, engage patients in medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), and reduce illicit drug use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective nonrandomized study in individuals who experienced opioid overdoses, received naloxone, but subsequently declined buprenorphine initiation in the ED. Each participant was followed by an RCP team that performed a brief negotiation interview (BNI) to motivate engagement in treatment, peer-recovery coaching to encourage recovery-related activities, and health education around medical concerns by trained paramedics. Participants were followed-up at 30 and 180 days. The primary hypothesized outcome was reduction in overdose events; the secondary hypothesized outcomes were engagement in MOUD and reduction in opioid positive urine tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-one patients were enrolled and received BNIs; 45 (56%; 95% CI: 44-67) had at least 1 follow-up encounter. Twenty participants (25%; 95% CI: 16-36) had at least 1 overdose during follow-up. Fifty-five participants (68%; 95% CI: 57-78) were confirmed to have engaged in some form of medication treatment. Differences in subsequent overdose events (<i>P</i> = .95), engagement in MOUD (<i>P</i> = .49), and rates of opioid-positive urine toxicology rates within 30 days (<i>P</i> = .44) and between 31 and 180 days (<i>P</i> = .46) were not significantly different when comparing those who did and did not follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no differences in rates of subsequent overdose, MOUD engagement, or positive urine toxicology screens in our intervention. However, 68% of participants engaged in outpatient MOUD, a treatment associated with fewer overdose events, particularly fatal ones. Substantial limitations occurred due to the COVID pandemic, and sample size estimates were not met. Further research is needed to investigate potential benefits of the SafetyNet program.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342241266412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine has proven efficacy, but many patients are reluctant to begin this treatment. This study evaluated SafetyNet, a program using a 2-person, recovery coach and paramedic (RCP) intervention postoverdose to reduce subsequent opioid overdose, engage patients in medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), and reduce illicit drug use.

Methods: We conducted a prospective nonrandomized study in individuals who experienced opioid overdoses, received naloxone, but subsequently declined buprenorphine initiation in the ED. Each participant was followed by an RCP team that performed a brief negotiation interview (BNI) to motivate engagement in treatment, peer-recovery coaching to encourage recovery-related activities, and health education around medical concerns by trained paramedics. Participants were followed-up at 30 and 180 days. The primary hypothesized outcome was reduction in overdose events; the secondary hypothesized outcomes were engagement in MOUD and reduction in opioid positive urine tests.

Results: Eighty-one patients were enrolled and received BNIs; 45 (56%; 95% CI: 44-67) had at least 1 follow-up encounter. Twenty participants (25%; 95% CI: 16-36) had at least 1 overdose during follow-up. Fifty-five participants (68%; 95% CI: 57-78) were confirmed to have engaged in some form of medication treatment. Differences in subsequent overdose events (P = .95), engagement in MOUD (P = .49), and rates of opioid-positive urine toxicology rates within 30 days (P = .44) and between 31 and 180 days (P = .46) were not significantly different when comparing those who did and did not follow-up.

Conclusion: There were no differences in rates of subsequent overdose, MOUD engagement, or positive urine toxicology screens in our intervention. However, 68% of participants engaged in outpatient MOUD, a treatment associated with fewer overdose events, particularly fatal ones. Substantial limitations occurred due to the COVID pandemic, and sample size estimates were not met. Further research is needed to investigate potential benefits of the SafetyNet program.

"安全网":阿片类药物过量纳洛酮复苏后康复教练和辅助医务人员干预的评估。
目的:急诊科(ED)发起的丁丙诺啡治疗已被证实具有疗效,但许多患者不愿开始这种治疗。本研究对安全网(SafetyNet)项目进行了评估,该项目采用双人康复教练和护理人员(RCP)干预的方式,在用药过量后减少后续阿片类药物过量,让患者接受阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)药物治疗,并减少非法药物使用:我们对经历阿片类药物过量、接受纳洛酮治疗但随后拒绝在急诊室使用丁丙诺啡的患者进行了一项前瞻性非随机研究。每个参与者都接受了一个 RCP 小组的随访,该小组进行了简短的协商访谈(BNI),以激励参与者参与治疗;进行了同伴康复辅导,以鼓励开展与康复相关的活动;并由训练有素的护理人员围绕医疗问题开展健康教育。对参与者进行了 30 天和 180 天的随访。主要假设结果是减少用药过量事件;次要假设结果是参与 MOUD 和减少阿片类药物阳性尿检:81名患者登记并接受了BNIs治疗;45名患者(56%;95% CI:44-67)至少接受了一次随访。20名参与者(25%;95% CI:16-36)在随访期间至少出现过一次用药过量。55 名参与者(68%;95% CI:57-78)被证实接受过某种形式的药物治疗。在对参加和未参加随访的人员进行比较时,随后发生的用药过量事件(P = .95)、参加 MOUD(P = .49)以及 30 天内(P = .44)和 31 至 180 天内(P = .46)阿片类药物尿液毒理学阳性率的差异均无显著差异:结论:在我们的干预措施中,用药过量、参与 MOUD 或尿液毒理学检查呈阳性的比例没有差异。然而,68%的参与者接受了门诊MOUD治疗,这种治疗方法可减少用药过量事件,尤其是致命事件。由于 COVID 大流行,我们的研究受到了很大的限制,样本量也没有达到估计值。需要进一步研究安全网计划的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信