Mechanochemical chemically assisted ablation of varicose veins for venous insufficiency: American vein and lymphatic society position statement.

John Blebea, Eri Fukaya, Keith S Moore, Fedor Lurie
{"title":"Mechanochemical chemically assisted ablation of varicose veins for venous insufficiency: American vein and lymphatic society position statement.","authors":"John Blebea, Eri Fukaya, Keith S Moore, Fedor Lurie","doi":"10.1177/02683555241276554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Mechanical occlusion chemically assisted ablation (MOCA) of incompetent saphenous veins has been utilized since its FDA approval in 2008. However, only recently have longer-term three and 5 year clinical follow up data become available. This updated information necessitates a societal update to guide treatment and ensure optimal patient outcomes. <b>Method:</b> The American Vein and Lymphatic Society convened an expert panel to write a Position Statement with explanations and recommendations for the appropriate use of MOCA for patients with venous insufficiency. <b>Result:</b> This Position Statement was produced by the expert panel with recommendations for appropriate use, treatment technique, outcomes review, and potential adverse events. These recommendations were reviewed, edited, and approved by the Guidelines Committee of the Society. <b>Conclusions:</b> MOCA is effective in alleviating symptoms and a safe treatment option for venous insufficiency. It obviates the need for tumescent anesthesia, has less procedural discomfort and lower risk of thermal nerve or skin injury. It may be used in both the below knee distal GSV as well as the SSV. However, it is associated with significantly lower rates of vessel closure and higher recanalization rates compared to both RFA and EVLA and is less cost effective than thermal techniques. It is an available option for those in whom thermal ablation is not suitable.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555241276554"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555241276554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mechanical occlusion chemically assisted ablation (MOCA) of incompetent saphenous veins has been utilized since its FDA approval in 2008. However, only recently have longer-term three and 5 year clinical follow up data become available. This updated information necessitates a societal update to guide treatment and ensure optimal patient outcomes. Method: The American Vein and Lymphatic Society convened an expert panel to write a Position Statement with explanations and recommendations for the appropriate use of MOCA for patients with venous insufficiency. Result: This Position Statement was produced by the expert panel with recommendations for appropriate use, treatment technique, outcomes review, and potential adverse events. These recommendations were reviewed, edited, and approved by the Guidelines Committee of the Society. Conclusions: MOCA is effective in alleviating symptoms and a safe treatment option for venous insufficiency. It obviates the need for tumescent anesthesia, has less procedural discomfort and lower risk of thermal nerve or skin injury. It may be used in both the below knee distal GSV as well as the SSV. However, it is associated with significantly lower rates of vessel closure and higher recanalization rates compared to both RFA and EVLA and is less cost effective than thermal techniques. It is an available option for those in whom thermal ablation is not suitable.

针对静脉功能不全的曲张静脉机械化学辅助消融术:美国静脉与淋巴协会立场声明。
背景:自 2008 年获得美国食品及药物管理局批准以来,针对无功能隐静脉的机械闭塞化学辅助消融术(MOCA)一直在使用。然而,直到最近才有了三年和五年的长期临床随访数据。有必要对这些最新信息进行社会更新,以指导治疗并确保患者获得最佳疗效。方法:美国静脉和淋巴协会召集了一个专家小组,撰写了一份立场声明,对静脉功能不全患者如何适当使用 MOCA 做出了解释和建议。结果:专家小组撰写了这份立场声明,就适当使用、治疗技术、结果审查和潜在不良事件提出了建议。学会指南委员会对这些建议进行了审查、编辑和批准。结论:MOCA能有效缓解症状,是静脉功能不全的安全治疗方案。它无需进行肿胀麻醉,减少了手术过程中的不适感,降低了热神经或皮肤损伤的风险。它既可用于膝下远端 GSV,也可用于 SSV。不过,与 RFA 和 EVLA 相比,它的血管闭合率明显较低,再通率较高,而且成本效益低于热疗技术。对于那些不适合热消融的患者来说,这是一种可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信