Marital Status and Advance Care Planning Among Older Adults: Do Gendered Patterns Vary by Age?

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Lucie Kalousová, Deborah Carr
{"title":"Marital Status and Advance Care Planning Among Older Adults: Do Gendered Patterns Vary by Age?","authors":"Lucie Kalousová, Deborah Carr","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbae141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Advance care planning (ACP), which comprises a living will, durable power of attorney for healthcare (DPAHC), and end-of-life discussions, is an inherently relational process. However, it is unclear how marital status affects men's and women's ACP over the life course. Drawing on social control and gender-as-relational frameworks, we examine marital status differences in ACP and how these patterns differ by gender and age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from the 2020 Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a representative sample of U.S. older adults (N = 7,074). We estimate logistic regression models to evaluate whether marital status differences in ACP are moderated by age and gender, and multinomial logistic regressions to examine age and gender differences in DPAHC designations among married parents. Analyses are adjusted for sociodemographic and health covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariable analyses revealed significant moderation effects for discussions only. Among married/cohabiting persons, women are more likely than men to have end-of-life discussions, with gender differences diminishing slightly at oldest ages. Among divorced persons in their 60s and 70s, women are much more likely than men to have had discussions, although this gap converges among the oldest-old. Conversely, young-old widowed men and women are equally likely to have discussions, although women are increasingly likely to do so with advancing age. Men are more likely than women to name their spouse as DPAHC, yet this gap diminishes with age.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Healthcare providers can better guide end-of-life consultations if they understand how men's and women's family relationships change with advancing age.</p>","PeriodicalId":56111,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbae141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Advance care planning (ACP), which comprises a living will, durable power of attorney for healthcare (DPAHC), and end-of-life discussions, is an inherently relational process. However, it is unclear how marital status affects men's and women's ACP over the life course. Drawing on social control and gender-as-relational frameworks, we examine marital status differences in ACP and how these patterns differ by gender and age.

Methods: Data are from the 2020 Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a representative sample of U.S. older adults (N = 7,074). We estimate logistic regression models to evaluate whether marital status differences in ACP are moderated by age and gender, and multinomial logistic regressions to examine age and gender differences in DPAHC designations among married parents. Analyses are adjusted for sociodemographic and health covariates.

Results: Multivariable analyses revealed significant moderation effects for discussions only. Among married/cohabiting persons, women are more likely than men to have end-of-life discussions, with gender differences diminishing slightly at oldest ages. Among divorced persons in their 60s and 70s, women are much more likely than men to have had discussions, although this gap converges among the oldest-old. Conversely, young-old widowed men and women are equally likely to have discussions, although women are increasingly likely to do so with advancing age. Men are more likely than women to name their spouse as DPAHC, yet this gap diminishes with age.

Discussion: Healthcare providers can better guide end-of-life consultations if they understand how men's and women's family relationships change with advancing age.

老年人的婚姻状况和预先护理规划:性别模式是否因年龄而异?
目的:预先护理计划(ACP)包括生前预嘱、健康护理持久授权书(DPAHC)和临终讨论,它本质上是一个关系过程。然而,目前还不清楚婚姻状况如何影响男性和女性在生命过程中的 ACP。我们以社会控制和性别为关系框架,研究了ACP中的婚姻状况差异,以及这些模式在性别和年龄上的不同:数据来自 2020 年健康与退休研究(HRS),该研究是美国老年人的代表性样本(N = 7074)。我们估算了逻辑回归模型,以评估ACP中的婚姻状况差异是否受年龄和性别的影响;还估算了多项式逻辑回归,以检验已婚父母在指定DPAHC方面的年龄和性别差异。根据社会人口学和健康协变量对分析结果进行了调整:多变量分析显示,只有讨论具有显著的调节效应。在已婚/同居者中,女性比男性更有可能进行临终讨论,年龄越大,差异越小。在 60 多岁和 70 多岁的离异人士中,女性比男性更有可能进行临终讨论,但这一差距在最年长者中有所收敛。相反,年轻的老年丧偶男性和女性进行讨论的可能性相当,但随着年龄的增长,女性进行讨论的可能性越来越大。男性比女性更有可能指定其配偶为 DPAHC,但这种差距随着年龄的增长而缩小:讨论:如果医疗服务提供者了解男性和女性的家庭关系是如何随着年龄的增长而变化的,他们就能更好地指导临终咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.10%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences publishes articles on development in adulthood and old age that advance the psychological science of aging processes and outcomes. Articles have clear implications for theoretical or methodological innovation in the psychology of aging or contribute significantly to the empirical understanding of psychological processes and aging. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, attitudes, clinical applications, cognition, education, emotion, health, human factors, interpersonal relations, neuropsychology, perception, personality, physiological psychology, social psychology, and sensation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信