Assessment of Three Distinct Approaches to Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair, a Randomized Prospective Study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Zafer Şenol, Tuna Ertürk, Haron Cemel, Kadir Yıldırak, Dilek Metin Yamaç, Nurhilal Kızıltoprak, Salih Genç, Bora İşçeviren, Atahan Karaaslan, Gamze Ceylan Çalık, Elif Didem Terzi, Merve Karadağ, Bülent Güleç
{"title":"Assessment of Three Distinct Approaches to Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair, a Randomized Prospective Study.","authors":"Zafer Şenol, Tuna Ertürk, Haron Cemel, Kadir Yıldırak, Dilek Metin Yamaç, Nurhilal Kızıltoprak, Salih Genç, Bora İşçeviren, Atahan Karaaslan, Gamze Ceylan Çalık, Elif Didem Terzi, Merve Karadağ, Bülent Güleç","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Contemporarily, transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) procedure in inguinal hernia treatment is counted among the routine minimal invasive general surgery practices. Increased patient's comfort, namely less postoperative pain, is considered to be its greatest advantage. However, pain following surgery can still be an important problem. Port site local anesthetic injection (PSLAI), iliohypogastric-/ilioinguinal nerve block (IINB), and preperitoneal local anesthetic spraying (PLAS) are relatively new techniques with sparse data to address this issue. Therefore, we conducted this prospective study to evaluate these three methods in patients who underwent TAPP for inguinal hernia repair. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 99 patients were enrolled and randomized equally into three groups. Every patient received a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. PCA usage, total analgesic demands, and numerical rating scale values were recorded at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively (p.o). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Patients' demographic data (age, gender, BMI) did not reveal any significant difference between groups (<i>P</i> > .05). Procedure duration was found to be significantly longer in IINB group compared with others (<i>p</i> < .05). Number of PCA usages, total analgesic demand, additional analgesic requirement did not differ significantly between groups at 24-hour p.o (<i>P</i> > .05). PLAS group was found to have less average NSR score compared with other groups at 24 hours p.o (<i>p</i> < .05). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> All three procedures show promising outcomes with PLAS technique appearing to be slightly superior in terms of pain management in the immediate postoperative period. However, to reach a conclusion more randomized controlled trials covering various aspects and techniques of minimal invasive approach to inguinal hernia repair should be published.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"1021-1025"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Contemporarily, transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) procedure in inguinal hernia treatment is counted among the routine minimal invasive general surgery practices. Increased patient's comfort, namely less postoperative pain, is considered to be its greatest advantage. However, pain following surgery can still be an important problem. Port site local anesthetic injection (PSLAI), iliohypogastric-/ilioinguinal nerve block (IINB), and preperitoneal local anesthetic spraying (PLAS) are relatively new techniques with sparse data to address this issue. Therefore, we conducted this prospective study to evaluate these three methods in patients who underwent TAPP for inguinal hernia repair. Methods: A total of 99 patients were enrolled and randomized equally into three groups. Every patient received a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. PCA usage, total analgesic demands, and numerical rating scale values were recorded at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively (p.o). Results: Patients' demographic data (age, gender, BMI) did not reveal any significant difference between groups (P > .05). Procedure duration was found to be significantly longer in IINB group compared with others (p < .05). Number of PCA usages, total analgesic demand, additional analgesic requirement did not differ significantly between groups at 24-hour p.o (P > .05). PLAS group was found to have less average NSR score compared with other groups at 24 hours p.o (p < .05). Conclusions: All three procedures show promising outcomes with PLAS technique appearing to be slightly superior in terms of pain management in the immediate postoperative period. However, to reach a conclusion more randomized controlled trials covering various aspects and techniques of minimal invasive approach to inguinal hernia repair should be published.

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术术后疼痛的三种不同方法评估,随机前瞻性研究。
背景:目前,腹股沟疝治疗中的经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)属于常规微创普外科手术。增加病人的舒适度,即减少术后疼痛,被认为是其最大的优势。然而,术后疼痛仍是一个重要问题。港部位局麻药注射(PSLAI)、髂腹/髂腹股沟神经阻滞(IINB)和腹膜前局麻药喷洒(PLAS)是相对较新的技术,但解决这一问题的数据较少。因此,我们开展了这项前瞻性研究,对接受腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)的患者采用这三种方法进行评估。方法:共招募了 99 名患者,将他们随机平均分为三组。每名患者都接受了患者自控镇痛(PCA)装置。记录术后 2、6、12 和 24 小时(p.o)的 PCA 使用情况、总镇痛需求量和数字评分量表值。结果两组患者的人口统计学数据(年龄、性别、体重指数)无明显差异(P > .05)。与其他组相比,IINB 组的手术时间明显更长(P < .05)。使用 PCA 的次数、总镇痛剂需求量、额外镇痛剂需求量在 24 小时开放时间内组间无明显差异(P > .05)。与其他组相比,PLAS 组在 24 小时后的平均 NSR 评分较低(P < .05)。结论:所有三种手术都显示出良好的效果,其中 PLAS 技术在术后即刻的疼痛控制方面似乎略胜一筹。不过,要得出结论,还需要发表更多的随机对照试验,涵盖腹股沟疝修补术微创方法的各个方面和技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信