Reliability of Anthropometric Measurement of Young Children with Parent Involvement.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Sarah Rae, Eleanor Pullenayegum, Frank Ong, Cindy-Lee Dennis, Jill Hamilton, Jonathon Maguire, Catherine Birken
{"title":"Reliability of Anthropometric Measurement of Young Children with Parent Involvement.","authors":"Sarah Rae, Eleanor Pullenayegum, Frank Ong, Cindy-Lee Dennis, Jill Hamilton, Jonathon Maguire, Catherine Birken","doi":"10.1089/chi.2023.0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of anthropometric measurements between two trained anthropometrists working in a team and one trained anthropometrist working with a child's parent/caregiver in a primary health care setting. <b><i>Study Design:</i></b> An observational study to determine measurement reliability was conducted in a primary care child research network in Canada. In total, 120 children 0-5 years old had their anthropometric measurement taken twice by two trained anthropometrists working in a team and twice by one trained anthropometrist working with a child's parent/caregiver. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was calculated using the technical error of measurement (TEM), relative TEM (%TEM), and the coefficient of reliability (R). <b><i>Results:</i></b> The %TEM values for length/height and weight were <2%, and the R coefficient values were >0.99, indicating a high degree of inter- and intra-observer reliability. The TEM values demonstrated a high degree of reliability for inter- and intra-observer measurement of length/height in comparison with other anthropometric measurement parameters. However, there was greater variation seen in the length measurement for children 0 to <2 years of age and in arm circumference measurement across both age-groups. <b><i>Conclusion(s):</i></b> This study suggests that anthropometric measurement taken by one trained anthropometrist with the assistance of a parent/caregiver is reliable. These findings provide evidence to support inclusion of a child's parent/caregiver with anthropometric measurement collection in clinical setting(s) to enhance feasibility and efficiency and reduce the research costs of including a second trained anthropometrist.</p>","PeriodicalId":48842,"journal":{"name":"Childhood Obesity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childhood Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2023.0065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of anthropometric measurements between two trained anthropometrists working in a team and one trained anthropometrist working with a child's parent/caregiver in a primary health care setting. Study Design: An observational study to determine measurement reliability was conducted in a primary care child research network in Canada. In total, 120 children 0-5 years old had their anthropometric measurement taken twice by two trained anthropometrists working in a team and twice by one trained anthropometrist working with a child's parent/caregiver. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was calculated using the technical error of measurement (TEM), relative TEM (%TEM), and the coefficient of reliability (R). Results: The %TEM values for length/height and weight were <2%, and the R coefficient values were >0.99, indicating a high degree of inter- and intra-observer reliability. The TEM values demonstrated a high degree of reliability for inter- and intra-observer measurement of length/height in comparison with other anthropometric measurement parameters. However, there was greater variation seen in the length measurement for children 0 to <2 years of age and in arm circumference measurement across both age-groups. Conclusion(s): This study suggests that anthropometric measurement taken by one trained anthropometrist with the assistance of a parent/caregiver is reliable. These findings provide evidence to support inclusion of a child's parent/caregiver with anthropometric measurement collection in clinical setting(s) to enhance feasibility and efficiency and reduce the research costs of including a second trained anthropometrist.

有家长参与的幼儿人体测量的可靠性。
背景:本研究的目的是确定在初级卫生保健机构中,两名训练有素的人体测量师以团队形式工作,以及一名训练有素的人体测量师与儿童的父母/看护人一起工作时所进行的人体测量的可靠性。研究设计:在加拿大的一个初级保健儿童研究网络中开展了一项观察性研究,以确定测量的可靠性。共有 120 名 0-5 岁儿童接受了由两名训练有素的人体测量师组成的团队进行的两次人体测量,以及由一名训练有素的人体测量师与儿童家长/看护人共同进行的两次人体测量。使用测量技术误差(TEM)、相对 TEM(%TEM)和可靠性系数(R)计算观察者之间和观察者内部的可靠性。结果:身长/身高和体重的 TEM 百分比值均为 0.99,表明观察者之间和观察者内部的可靠性很高。与其他人体测量参数相比,身长/身高的 TEM 值显示出观察者之间和观察者内部测量的高度可靠性。不过,0 到结论(s)年龄段儿童的身长测量结果差异较大:这项研究表明,由一名训练有素的人体测量师在家长/护理人员的协助下进行人体测量是可靠的。这些研究结果提供了证据,支持在临床环境中让儿童的父母/看护人参与人体测量收集工作,以提高可行性和效率,并降低包括第二名训练有素的人体测量师在内的研究成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Childhood Obesity
Childhood Obesity PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Childhood Obesity is the only peer-reviewed journal that delivers actionable, real-world obesity prevention and weight management strategies for children and adolescents. Health disparities and cultural sensitivities are addressed, and plans and protocols are recommended to effect change at the family, school, and community level. The Journal also reports on the problem of access to effective healthcare and delivers evidence-based solutions to overcome these barriers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信