Individual differences in developmental trajectories of affective attention and relations with competence and social reticence with peers.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Alicia Vallorani, Kelley E Gunther, Lori B Reider, Jessica L Burris, Vanessa LoBue, Kristin A Buss, Koraly Pérez-Edgar
{"title":"Individual differences in developmental trajectories of affective attention and relations with competence and social reticence with peers.","authors":"Alicia Vallorani, Kelley E Gunther, Lori B Reider, Jessica L Burris, Vanessa LoBue, Kristin A Buss, Koraly Pérez-Edgar","doi":"10.1037/emo0001383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined individual differences in affective attention trajectories in infancy and relations with competence and social reticence at 24 months. Data collection spanned 2017 to 2021. Infants (<i>N</i> = 297, 53% White, 49% reported as assigned male at birth) recruited in South Central and Central Pennsylvania and Northern New Jersey provided eye-tracking data at five assessments. Caregivers self-reported anxiety symptoms, infant temperamental negative affect, and infant competence at the final assessment. A subgroup of infants participated in a peer social dyad at the final assessment. Using group-based trajectory modeling, we found three groups of infants with different affective attention trajectories: affective attention increasers (<i>n</i> = 73), affective attention shifters (<i>n</i> = 156), and affective attention decreasers (<i>n</i> = 50). Affective attention increasers exhibited low intercepts with steep attention increases, particularly to angry facial configurations. Affective attention shifters exhibited middle intercepts with attention decreases to facial configurations but an attention increase to angry facial configurations. Affective attention decreasers exhibited high intercepts with steep attention decreases. Infants in the affective attention increasers group exhibited more competence when accounting for caregiver anxiety symptoms and infant temperamental negative affect. Group membership was not related to social reticence during the peer social dyad. Infants higher in temperamental negative affect exhibited more social reticence, particularly as the social dyad continued. Our results provide evidence for individual differences in developmental trajectories of affective attention and relations with toddler social behavior. Our results are primarily generalizable to rural and urban populations in the Midatlantic United States. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001383","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined individual differences in affective attention trajectories in infancy and relations with competence and social reticence at 24 months. Data collection spanned 2017 to 2021. Infants (N = 297, 53% White, 49% reported as assigned male at birth) recruited in South Central and Central Pennsylvania and Northern New Jersey provided eye-tracking data at five assessments. Caregivers self-reported anxiety symptoms, infant temperamental negative affect, and infant competence at the final assessment. A subgroup of infants participated in a peer social dyad at the final assessment. Using group-based trajectory modeling, we found three groups of infants with different affective attention trajectories: affective attention increasers (n = 73), affective attention shifters (n = 156), and affective attention decreasers (n = 50). Affective attention increasers exhibited low intercepts with steep attention increases, particularly to angry facial configurations. Affective attention shifters exhibited middle intercepts with attention decreases to facial configurations but an attention increase to angry facial configurations. Affective attention decreasers exhibited high intercepts with steep attention decreases. Infants in the affective attention increasers group exhibited more competence when accounting for caregiver anxiety symptoms and infant temperamental negative affect. Group membership was not related to social reticence during the peer social dyad. Infants higher in temperamental negative affect exhibited more social reticence, particularly as the social dyad continued. Our results provide evidence for individual differences in developmental trajectories of affective attention and relations with toddler social behavior. Our results are primarily generalizable to rural and urban populations in the Midatlantic United States. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

情感关注发展轨迹的个体差异以及与同龄人的能力和社交退缩的关系。
本研究考察了婴儿期情感注意轨迹的个体差异,以及24个月时与能力和社交缄默的关系。数据收集时间跨度为 2017 年至 2021 年。在宾夕法尼亚州中南部和中部以及新泽西州北部招募的婴儿(N = 297,53% 为白人,49% 在出生时被指定为男性)在五次评估中提供了眼动跟踪数据。护理人员在最后一次评估中自我报告了焦虑症状、婴儿脾气负面情绪和婴儿能力。在最后一次评估中,一部分婴儿参加了同伴社交活动。通过基于群体的轨迹建模,我们发现三组婴儿具有不同的情感注意轨迹:情感注意增加者(73 人)、情感注意转移者(156 人)和情感注意减少者(50 人)。情感注意递增者的截距较低,注意陡增,尤其是对愤怒的面部配置。情感注意力转移者表现出中等截距,对面部配置的注意力下降,但对愤怒面部配置的注意力上升。情感注意力下降者的截距较高,注意力急剧下降。如果考虑到照顾者的焦虑症状和婴儿脾气的负面情绪,情感注意增加组的婴儿表现出更强的能力。组别成员资格与婴儿在同伴交往中的社交缄默无关。脾气负面情绪较高的婴儿表现出更多的社交缄默,尤其是在社交二人组继续进行时。我们的研究结果为情感注意的发展轨迹及与幼儿社交行为的关系提供了个体差异的证据。我们的研究结果主要适用于美国大西洋中部的农村和城市人口。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信