Participation in a daily diary study about suicide ideation yields no iatrogenic effects: A mixed method analysis.

IF 2.7 3区医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY

Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1111/sltb.13125

H A Love, P Morgan, P N Smith

{"title":"Participation in a daily diary study about suicide ideation yields no iatrogenic effects: A mixed method analysis.","authors":"H A Love, P Morgan, P N Smith","doi":"10.1111/sltb.13125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Despite evidence that participation in suicide research is not associated with worsening ideation, behaviors, or intent, the rise of intensive longitudinal methods to assess ideation and behaviors necessitates further investigation for potential iatrogenic effects. The present study assessed rates of change in suicide ideation (SI) in a 10-day daily diary study.Methods: Seventy-two adult participants with ongoing SI participated in 10 daily diary surveys and three follow-up assessments. One open-ended item was included to address participant experiences in the study.Results: A multilevel piecewise growth model revealed steady declines in SI for participants over the 10 days. However, rates of SI increased during the follow-up assessments, indicating that participation in the daily surveys was associated with general reductions in SI. Further, qualitative analyses of experiences in the study revealed the following themes: Useful (n = 34), Heightened Awareness (n = 21), Functional (n = 6), Not Useful (n = 6), and Beneficence (n = 4).Conclusion: This study demonstrated that participation in suicide research, including intensive longitudinal methods such as daily diary studies, did not have iatrogenic effects on participants with SI. Qualitative results demonstrated the numerous benefits participants derived while taking part in this study.","PeriodicalId":39684,"journal":{"name":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.13125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite evidence that participation in suicide research is not associated with worsening ideation, behaviors, or intent, the rise of intensive longitudinal methods to assess ideation and behaviors necessitates further investigation for potential iatrogenic effects. The present study assessed rates of change in suicide ideation (SI) in a 10-day daily diary study.

Methods: Seventy-two adult participants with ongoing SI participated in 10 daily diary surveys and three follow-up assessments. One open-ended item was included to address participant experiences in the study.

Results: A multilevel piecewise growth model revealed steady declines in SI for participants over the 10 days. However, rates of SI increased during the follow-up assessments, indicating that participation in the daily surveys was associated with general reductions in SI. Further, qualitative analyses of experiences in the study revealed the following themes: Useful (n = 34), Heightened Awareness (n = 21), Functional (n = 6), Not Useful (n = 6), and Beneficence (n = 4).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that participation in suicide research, including intensive longitudinal methods such as daily diary studies, did not have iatrogenic effects on participants with SI. Qualitative results demonstrated the numerous benefits participants derived while taking part in this study.

查看原文本刊更多论文

参与有关自杀意念的每日日记研究不会产生先天性影响：混合方法分析

导言：尽管有证据表明参与自杀研究与意念、行为或意图的恶化无关，但随着评估意念和行为的纵向强化方法的兴起，有必要进一步调查潜在的先天性影响。本研究在一项为期 10 天的每日日记研究中评估了自杀意念（SI）的变化率：72名有持续自杀意念的成年参与者参加了10次每日日记调查和3次后续评估。其中一个开放式项目涉及参与者在研究中的经历：多层次片断增长模型显示，参与者的 SI 在 10 天内稳步下降。然而，在后续评估中，SI 的比率有所上升，这表明参与日常调查与 SI 的总体下降有关。此外，对研究经验的定性分析揭示了以下主题：有用（34 人）、提高认识（21 人）、功能性（6 人）、无用（6 人）和有益（4 人）：本研究表明，参与自杀研究（包括每日日记研究等密集纵向方法）不会对患有 SI 的参与者产生先天性影响。定性结果表明，参与者在参与这项研究时受益匪浅。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

3.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： An excellent resource for researchers as well as students, Social Cognition features reports on empirical research, self-perception, self-concept, social neuroscience, person-memory integration, social schemata, the development of social cognition, and the role of affect in memory and perception. Three broad concerns define the scope of the journal: - The processes underlying the perception, memory, and judgment of social stimuli - The effects of social, cultural, and affective factors on the processing of information - The behavioral and interpersonal consequences of cognitive processes.