Understanding the topical, conceptual, contextual, and methodological trends of cyberbullying research.

Q2 Social Sciences
Yeojin Kim, Viviana C Zambrano Rodriguez
{"title":"Understanding the topical, conceptual, contextual, and methodological trends of cyberbullying research.","authors":"Yeojin Kim, Viviana C Zambrano Rodriguez","doi":"10.1080/17538068.2024.2393920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cyberbullying research has gained considerable attention among scholars due to the proliferation and diversification of the digital media platforms. Although cyberbullying research has a robust empirical nature, the research is more difficult to define and deserves close investigation. In response to the situation, we have examined topics, forms, context, media, predictive factors, outcomes, utilization of methodology, and research trends in cyberbullying research from 2014 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed 3,588 articles to investigate the trend and development of cyberbullying research using the <i>Scopus</i> academic databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>85.87% of research focused on cyberbullying as 'social issues'. 71.57% of articles focused on cyberbullying itself rather than specific forms of cyberbullying. 50.81% of articles focused on cyberbullying in middle/high school contexts. Most research did not state any predictive factors (39.83%) or outcomes (60.17%) suggested. The predominant research method used in cyberbullying research was via surveys (30.69%), while the second phase of research dominated the cyberbullying research agenda (victims and bullies in cyberbullying).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although Cyberbullying research has increased, broadened, and diversified over time, it still focuses primarily on the first phase of the research agenda of cyberbullying issues. The findings of this study provides a framework for new insights for future cyberbullying research and practices by suggesting exploration to different mechanisms of cyberbullying such as: victims/bullies, effects, and improvement of cyberbullying beyond the issues of cyberbullying itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":38052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"345-354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2024.2393920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cyberbullying research has gained considerable attention among scholars due to the proliferation and diversification of the digital media platforms. Although cyberbullying research has a robust empirical nature, the research is more difficult to define and deserves close investigation. In response to the situation, we have examined topics, forms, context, media, predictive factors, outcomes, utilization of methodology, and research trends in cyberbullying research from 2014 to 2023.

Methods: This study analyzed 3,588 articles to investigate the trend and development of cyberbullying research using the Scopus academic databases.

Results: 85.87% of research focused on cyberbullying as 'social issues'. 71.57% of articles focused on cyberbullying itself rather than specific forms of cyberbullying. 50.81% of articles focused on cyberbullying in middle/high school contexts. Most research did not state any predictive factors (39.83%) or outcomes (60.17%) suggested. The predominant research method used in cyberbullying research was via surveys (30.69%), while the second phase of research dominated the cyberbullying research agenda (victims and bullies in cyberbullying).

Conclusions: Although Cyberbullying research has increased, broadened, and diversified over time, it still focuses primarily on the first phase of the research agenda of cyberbullying issues. The findings of this study provides a framework for new insights for future cyberbullying research and practices by suggesting exploration to different mechanisms of cyberbullying such as: victims/bullies, effects, and improvement of cyberbullying beyond the issues of cyberbullying itself.

了解网络欺凌研究的主题、概念、背景和方法趋势。
背景:由于数字媒体平台的激增和多样化,网络欺凌研究受到了学者们的广泛关注。虽然网络欺凌研究具有较强的实证性,但研究的界定较为困难,值得深入探究。针对这一情况,我们对 2014 年至 2023 年网络欺凌研究的主题、形式、背景、媒介、预测因素、结果、方法论的运用以及研究趋势进行了研究:本研究使用 Scopus 学术数据库分析了 3,588 篇文章,以探究网络欺凌研究的趋势和发展:85.87%的研究关注作为 "社会问题 "的网络欺凌。71.57%的文章关注网络欺凌本身,而不是特定形式的网络欺凌。50.81%的文章侧重于初中/高中背景下的网络欺凌。大多数研究没有提出任何预测因素(39.83%)或结果(60.17%)。网络欺凌研究中使用的主要研究方法是调查(30.69%),而第二阶段的研究则主导了网络欺凌研究议程(网络欺凌中的受害者和欺凌者):尽管网络欺凌研究随着时间的推移不断增加、拓宽和多样化,但仍主要集中在网络欺凌问题研究议程的第一阶段。本研究的发现为未来的网络欺凌研究和实践提供了一个新的见解框架,建议探索网络欺凌的不同机制,如:受害者/欺凌者、影响以及网络欺凌问题本身之外的网络欺凌的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Communication in Healthcare
Journal of Communication in Healthcare Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信