[The duration of orthodontic treatment and the number of visits depending on the degree of difficulty when using modern orthodontic equipment].

Q4 Medicine
V E Tikhonov, V M Grinin, A V Sevbitov
{"title":"[The duration of orthodontic treatment and the number of visits depending on the degree of difficulty when using modern orthodontic equipment].","authors":"V E Tikhonov, V M Grinin, A V Sevbitov","doi":"10.17116/stomat202410304154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to analyze the estimated and actual duration of treatment and the number of visits to the orthodontist by patients using modern orthodontic equipment. Analysis of the duration of orthodontic treatment of patients with varying degrees of difficulty and comparison of the estimated and actually spent time for its implementation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>308 medical records of patients who underwent orthodontic treatment were analyzed. According to the Siebert - Malygin method, the degree of difficulty of treatment, its duration, the number of necessary visits were calculated and the data obtained were compared with the actual time spent on correcting dental and occlusion anomalies and the number of visits by the patient to the orthodontist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of treatment of 308 patients who underwent orthodontic treatment with modern non-removable equipment (braces) are analyzed in the clinic of LLC «Prime dentistry» in Ryazan. Before starting treatment, the preliminary treatment time was calculated using the method of determining the difficulty of orthodontic treatment of Siebert - Malygin. The calculation of the degree of difficulty of treatment, its duration, and the number of necessary visits was carried out. The data obtained were compared with the actual time spent on correction of dental and occlusion anomalies and the number of visits by the patient to an orthodontist. It was found that, despite the use of modern equipment, the treatment time practically does not decrease, but the number of visits to achieve the desired result is significantly reduced. Coefficients have been calculated to clarify the required number of visits to the orthodontist. In the treatment of anomalies in the position of teeth (APD), it is 0.77, APD, combined with distal occlusion - 0.79 deep - 0.78, open - 0.66 and mesial - 0.69.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of modern orthodontic equipment reduces the number of patient visits to the doctor, which saves time, reduces labor costs and allows you to provide the necessary assistance to more people in need. The coefficients calculated during the study to determine the required number of visits to an orthodontist by a patient, depending on the existing orthodontic pathology, make it possible to predict the treatment time with greater accuracy when using the Siebert - Malygin method. This is very relevant when planning upcoming manipulations and to more accurately justify the cost of treatment depending on the required time and number of visits to eliminate APS.</p>","PeriodicalId":35887,"journal":{"name":"Stomatologiya","volume":"103 4","pages":"54-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stomatologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202410304154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study is to analyze the estimated and actual duration of treatment and the number of visits to the orthodontist by patients using modern orthodontic equipment. Analysis of the duration of orthodontic treatment of patients with varying degrees of difficulty and comparison of the estimated and actually spent time for its implementation.

Material and methods: 308 medical records of patients who underwent orthodontic treatment were analyzed. According to the Siebert - Malygin method, the degree of difficulty of treatment, its duration, the number of necessary visits were calculated and the data obtained were compared with the actual time spent on correcting dental and occlusion anomalies and the number of visits by the patient to the orthodontist.

Results: The results of treatment of 308 patients who underwent orthodontic treatment with modern non-removable equipment (braces) are analyzed in the clinic of LLC «Prime dentistry» in Ryazan. Before starting treatment, the preliminary treatment time was calculated using the method of determining the difficulty of orthodontic treatment of Siebert - Malygin. The calculation of the degree of difficulty of treatment, its duration, and the number of necessary visits was carried out. The data obtained were compared with the actual time spent on correction of dental and occlusion anomalies and the number of visits by the patient to an orthodontist. It was found that, despite the use of modern equipment, the treatment time practically does not decrease, but the number of visits to achieve the desired result is significantly reduced. Coefficients have been calculated to clarify the required number of visits to the orthodontist. In the treatment of anomalies in the position of teeth (APD), it is 0.77, APD, combined with distal occlusion - 0.79 deep - 0.78, open - 0.66 and mesial - 0.69.

Conclusion: The use of modern orthodontic equipment reduces the number of patient visits to the doctor, which saves time, reduces labor costs and allows you to provide the necessary assistance to more people in need. The coefficients calculated during the study to determine the required number of visits to an orthodontist by a patient, depending on the existing orthodontic pathology, make it possible to predict the treatment time with greater accuracy when using the Siebert - Malygin method. This is very relevant when planning upcoming manipulations and to more accurately justify the cost of treatment depending on the required time and number of visits to eliminate APS.

[正畸治疗的持续时间和就诊次数取决于使用现代正畸设备的困难程度]。
研究目的本研究旨在分析使用现代正畸设备的患者的预计和实际治疗时间,以及到正畸科就诊的次数。分析不同困难程度患者的正畸治疗持续时间,并比较估计和实际花费的正畸治疗时间。根据 Siebert - Malygin 方法,计算了治疗的困难程度、持续时间、必要的就诊次数,并将所得数据与矫正牙齿和咬合异常所花费的实际时间以及患者到正畸科就诊的次数进行了比较:在梁赞市的 "Prime dentistry "有限责任公司诊所对 308 名使用现代不可拆卸设备(牙套)进行正畸治疗的患者的治疗结果进行了分析。在开始治疗前,使用 Siebert - Malygin 的正畸治疗难度确定方法计算了初步治疗时间。对治疗难度、持续时间和必要的就诊次数进行了计算。将获得的数据与矫正牙齿和咬合异常所花费的实际时间以及患者到正畸医生处就诊的次数进行了比较。结果发现,尽管使用了现代设备,治疗时间实际上并没有减少,但为达到预期效果而就诊的次数却大大减少了。通过计算系数,可以明确看正畸医生所需的次数。在牙齿位置异常(APD)的治疗中,系数为 0.77,APD,结合远端咬合--0.79,深咬合--0.78,开放咬合--0.66,中间咬合--0.69:现代正畸设备的使用减少了患者就诊的次数,从而节省了时间,降低了人工成本,可以为更多需要帮助的人提供必要的帮助。研究中计算出的系数可以根据患者现有的正畸病理情况,确定患者去看正畸医生的所需次数,这使得在使用 Siebert - Malygin 方法时,可以更准确地预测治疗时间。这对于计划即将进行的矫治和根据消除 APS 所需的时间和就诊次数更准确地证明治疗费用非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stomatologiya
Stomatologiya Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信