Relationship Between Treatment Hours of Selected Disciplines and Change in Pain Impact During the Year Following Referral to an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Center: A Latent Class Analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Larisa A Burke, Diane M Flynn, Jeffrey C Ransom, Alana D Steffen, Shikhar H Shah, Ardith Z Doorenbos
{"title":"Relationship Between Treatment Hours of Selected Disciplines and Change in Pain Impact During the Year Following Referral to an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Center: A Latent Class Analysis.","authors":"Larisa A Burke, Diane M Flynn, Jeffrey C Ransom, Alana D Steffen, Shikhar H Shah, Ardith Z Doorenbos","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2024.0333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Pain management clinics differ in treatments offered, and little evidence exists regarding which combinations of therapies result in best outcomes. This study analyzed clinical encounters and pain outcomes data for associations between treatment composition and outcomes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Retrospective observational study of 2,142 predominantly active-duty US service members referred to an interdisciplinary pain management center between 2014 and 2021. Latent class analysis was used to identify treatment groups with distinct outcome patterns during the year following initial assessment. The primary outcome measure was the National Institutes of Health Task Force on Research Standards for Chronic Low-Back Pain impact score. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Four distinct treatment groups were identified: 1 group engaged in conventional medical therapies alone (<i>n</i> = 726, median 3.5 treatment hours), and 3 groups used a combination of conventional, psychological, rehabilitative, and complementary therapies, with different levels of treatment hours: low (<i>n</i> = 814, median 15.7 h), medium (<i>n</i> = 177, median 40.1 h), and high (<i>n</i> = 425, median 72.5 h). All groups showed significant improvement in pain impact score from baseline up to 9 months but not at 12 months following initial assessment. At the 6-month time point, the group with high multimodal treatment hours had the most improvement in pain impact (-3.1 [95% CI -3.8, -2.4]) compared with the group using only conventional therapies (-1.0 points [95% CI -1.8, -0.1]) or with low multimodal treatment hours (-1.3 points [95% CI -1.9, -0.7]). There were no between-group differences at the 9- or 12-month time points. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> These results suggest that a combination of pain therapy approaches results in greater reduction in pain impact than the use of conventional medical treatment alone for up to 6 months after initiating therapy and that there may be a threshold of treatment hours that must be exceeded to achieve this benefit. <b><i>Clinical trial registration:</i></b> As this study is not a clinical trial, no registration was required.</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"44-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2024.0333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pain management clinics differ in treatments offered, and little evidence exists regarding which combinations of therapies result in best outcomes. This study analyzed clinical encounters and pain outcomes data for associations between treatment composition and outcomes. Methods: Retrospective observational study of 2,142 predominantly active-duty US service members referred to an interdisciplinary pain management center between 2014 and 2021. Latent class analysis was used to identify treatment groups with distinct outcome patterns during the year following initial assessment. The primary outcome measure was the National Institutes of Health Task Force on Research Standards for Chronic Low-Back Pain impact score. Results: Four distinct treatment groups were identified: 1 group engaged in conventional medical therapies alone (n = 726, median 3.5 treatment hours), and 3 groups used a combination of conventional, psychological, rehabilitative, and complementary therapies, with different levels of treatment hours: low (n = 814, median 15.7 h), medium (n = 177, median 40.1 h), and high (n = 425, median 72.5 h). All groups showed significant improvement in pain impact score from baseline up to 9 months but not at 12 months following initial assessment. At the 6-month time point, the group with high multimodal treatment hours had the most improvement in pain impact (-3.1 [95% CI -3.8, -2.4]) compared with the group using only conventional therapies (-1.0 points [95% CI -1.8, -0.1]) or with low multimodal treatment hours (-1.3 points [95% CI -1.9, -0.7]). There were no between-group differences at the 9- or 12-month time points. Conclusion: These results suggest that a combination of pain therapy approaches results in greater reduction in pain impact than the use of conventional medical treatment alone for up to 6 months after initiating therapy and that there may be a threshold of treatment hours that must be exceeded to achieve this benefit. Clinical trial registration: As this study is not a clinical trial, no registration was required.

选定学科的治疗时间与转诊至跨学科疼痛管理中心后一年内疼痛影响变化之间的关系:潜类分析
简介疼痛治疗诊所提供的治疗方法各不相同,而关于哪种疗法组合能带来最佳疗效的证据却很少。本研究分析了临床病例和疼痛疗效数据,以找出治疗组合与疗效之间的关联。研究方法对 2014 年至 2021 年期间转诊到跨学科疼痛管理中心的 2,142 名现役美国军人进行回顾性观察研究。研究采用潜类分析法来确定在初次评估后一年内具有不同结果模式的治疗组。主要结果测量指标是美国国立卫生研究院研究标准特别工作组对慢性腰背痛的影响评分。结果:确定了四个不同的治疗组:1 组仅采用常规医疗疗法(n = 726,中位数为 3.5 个治疗小时),3 组综合采用常规、心理、康复和辅助疗法,治疗时间长短不一:低(n = 814,中位数为 15.7 个小时)、中(n = 177,中位数为 40.1 个小时)和高(n = 425,中位数为 72.5 个小时)。从基线到 9 个月期间,所有组的疼痛影响评分都有明显改善,但在初次评估后的 12 个月期间,疼痛影响评分没有明显改善。在 6 个月的时间点上,与仅使用传统疗法组(-1.0 分 [95% CI -1.8, -0.1])或低多模态治疗时长组(-1.3 分 [95% CI -1.9, -0.7])相比,高多模态治疗时长组对疼痛影响的改善最大(-3.1 [95% CI -3.8, -2.4])。在 9 个月或 12 个月的时间点上没有组间差异。结论这些结果表明,在开始治疗后的长达 6 个月内,联合使用疼痛治疗方法比单独使用常规药物治疗能更有效地减轻疼痛的影响,而且可能存在一个治疗时数阈值,必须超过该阈值才能获得这种益处。临床试验注册:由于本研究不是临床试验,因此无需注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信