Retrospective Cohort Study of Financial Incentives for Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing and Treatment in an Outreach Population in Edmonton, Canada, 2018-2019.
Jessica Krahn, Jennifer Gratrix, MuhammadNaeem Khan, Garret Meyer, Petra Smyczek, Ameeta E Singh
{"title":"Retrospective Cohort Study of Financial Incentives for Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing and Treatment in an Outreach Population in Edmonton, Canada, 2018-2019.","authors":"Jessica Krahn, Jennifer Gratrix, MuhammadNaeem Khan, Garret Meyer, Petra Smyczek, Ameeta E Singh","doi":"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) continues to increase worldwide. Patient incentives are one proposed intervention to increase STI testing and treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing incentivized versus routine care for STI outreach test and treat services between October 2018 and June 2019. Incentivized care included a $10 gift card for testing visits and an additional $10 gift card for results and/or treatment visits. Incentivized visits were offered to clients with a lack of housing, who were difficult to locate, or had a history of being lost to follow-up. All test and treatment visits included chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and HIV testing and/or treatment by Registered Nurses and outreach workers from an STI Clinic. Outreach visits were offered at subsidized housing locations, community-based organizations, and street outreach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From October 2018 to June 2019, 2384 outreach clients were reached: 453 (19.0%) received incentives and 1931 (81.0%) received routine care. There were no significant differences in case-finding rates for chlamydia (4.8%), gonorrhea (2.9%), and HIV (0.1%); however, there was for syphilis (3.8% for incentivized vs. 1.9% for routine visits; P = 0.02). All newly diagnosed infections identified in the incentivized group received treatment compared with routine visits (chlamydia 100% vs 79.1%, P = 0.008, gonorrhea 100% vs 59.7%, P = 0.002, and syphilis 100% vs. 86.7%, P = 0.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incentives were associated with increased case-finding rates of syphilis and were associated with 100% treatment rates. Incentives are a promising approach to decreasing the burden of STI among outreach populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21837,"journal":{"name":"Sexually transmitted diseases","volume":" ","pages":"37-42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) continues to increase worldwide. Patient incentives are one proposed intervention to increase STI testing and treatment.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing incentivized versus routine care for STI outreach test and treat services between October 2018 and June 2019. Incentivized care included a $10 gift card for testing visits and an additional $10 gift card for results and/or treatment visits. Incentivized visits were offered to clients with a lack of housing, who were difficult to locate, or had a history of being lost to follow-up. All test and treatment visits included chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and HIV testing and/or treatment by Registered Nurses and outreach workers from an STI Clinic. Outreach visits were offered at subsidized housing locations, community-based organizations, and street outreach.
Results: From October 2018 to June 2019, 2384 outreach clients were reached: 453 (19.0%) received incentives and 1931 (81.0%) received routine care. There were no significant differences in case-finding rates for chlamydia (4.8%), gonorrhea (2.9%), and HIV (0.1%); however, there was for syphilis (3.8% for incentivized vs. 1.9% for routine visits; P = 0.02). All newly diagnosed infections identified in the incentivized group received treatment compared with routine visits (chlamydia 100% vs 79.1%, P = 0.008, gonorrhea 100% vs 59.7%, P = 0.002, and syphilis 100% vs. 86.7%, P = 0.08).
Conclusions: Incentives were associated with increased case-finding rates of syphilis and were associated with 100% treatment rates. Incentives are a promising approach to decreasing the burden of STI among outreach populations.
期刊介绍:
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, the official journal of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association, publishes peer-reviewed, original articles on clinical, laboratory, immunologic, epidemiologic, behavioral, public health, and historical topics pertaining to sexually transmitted diseases and related fields. Reports from the CDC and NIH provide up-to-the-minute information. A highly respected editorial board is composed of prominent scientists who are leaders in this rapidly changing field. Included in each issue are studies and developments from around the world.