Individual and organizational outcomes of engaging peers in the cocreation of digital mental health interventions.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Margaret L Schneider, Biblia S Cha, Judith Borghouts, Elizabeth V Eikey, Stephen M Schueller, Nicole A Stadnick, Kai Zheng, Dana B Mukamel, Dara H Sorkin
{"title":"Individual and organizational outcomes of engaging peers in the cocreation of digital mental health interventions.","authors":"Margaret L Schneider, Biblia S Cha, Judith Borghouts, Elizabeth V Eikey, Stephen M Schueller, Nicole A Stadnick, Kai Zheng, Dana B Mukamel, Dara H Sorkin","doi":"10.1037/ser0000889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Within mental health services, persons in recovery from their own experiences of mental health challenges (peers) are increasingly being trained to provide peer support. This study describes individual and organizational outcomes related to engaging peers in a multisite demonstration project in California that sought to integrate them as cocreators throughout planning and implementation of digital mental health interventions. We collected data from key informants across 11 sites. Quarterly online surveys invited key informants to report perceived outcomes of the peer component. Biannual interviews elicited details regarding survey-reported outcomes. Quantitative data provided indications of outcome prevalence and consistency, and quotes from the interviews illustrated the complex realities underlying survey responses. One hundred three quarterly surveys and 39 biannual interviews were completed between Summer 2020 and Fall 2022. Key informants reported diverse outcomes, including integration of peer input into local decision making, mental health benefits to peers and community members, reduced workplace mental health stigma, and new cross-site collaborations. Five sites reported outcomes with greater consistency compared to the other six sites. Reports of increased peer visibility in the workplace coincided with reports of reduced stigma and increased value of peer input by mental health professionals. This study offers encouragement for the potential positive impact of engaging peers as cocreators of mental health interventions. Data suggest integrating peers does not increase mental health stigma and may instead result in various positive outcomes. The degree to which these outcomes manifest in a specific setting, however, may vary. Future research should seek to identify contextual factors that support actualization of positive outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000889","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within mental health services, persons in recovery from their own experiences of mental health challenges (peers) are increasingly being trained to provide peer support. This study describes individual and organizational outcomes related to engaging peers in a multisite demonstration project in California that sought to integrate them as cocreators throughout planning and implementation of digital mental health interventions. We collected data from key informants across 11 sites. Quarterly online surveys invited key informants to report perceived outcomes of the peer component. Biannual interviews elicited details regarding survey-reported outcomes. Quantitative data provided indications of outcome prevalence and consistency, and quotes from the interviews illustrated the complex realities underlying survey responses. One hundred three quarterly surveys and 39 biannual interviews were completed between Summer 2020 and Fall 2022. Key informants reported diverse outcomes, including integration of peer input into local decision making, mental health benefits to peers and community members, reduced workplace mental health stigma, and new cross-site collaborations. Five sites reported outcomes with greater consistency compared to the other six sites. Reports of increased peer visibility in the workplace coincided with reports of reduced stigma and increased value of peer input by mental health professionals. This study offers encouragement for the potential positive impact of engaging peers as cocreators of mental health interventions. Data suggest integrating peers does not increase mental health stigma and may instead result in various positive outcomes. The degree to which these outcomes manifest in a specific setting, however, may vary. Future research should seek to identify contextual factors that support actualization of positive outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

让同伴参与共同创造数字心理健康干预措施的个人和组织成果。
在心理健康服务中,越来越多从自身心理健康挑战中恢复过来的人(同伴)接受了提供同伴支持的培训。本研究描述了与同伴参与加利福尼亚州多站点示范项目有关的个人和组织成果,该项目旨在将同伴作为共同创造者纳入数字心理健康干预措施的整个规划和实施过程中。我们从 11 个地点的关键信息提供者那里收集了数据。每季度一次的在线调查邀请关键信息提供者报告他们所感知到的同伴部分的成果。每半年一次的访谈则收集了有关调查报告结果的详细信息。定量数据说明了结果的普遍性和一致性,而访谈中的引述则说明了调查答复背后的复杂现实。2020 年夏季至 2022 年秋季期间,共完成了 133 份季度调查和 39 次半年访谈。主要信息提供者报告了不同的成果,包括将同伴的意见纳入地方决策、为同伴和社区成员带来心理健康方面的益处、减少工作场所的心理健康耻辱感以及新的跨站点合作。与其他六个项目点相比,五个项目点报告的成果更加一致。在报告同伴在工作场所的能见度提高的同时,心理健康专业人员也报告说,耻辱感减少了,对同伴意见的重视程度提高了。这项研究为让同伴成为心理健康干预措施的共同创造者可能产生的积极影响提供了鼓励。数据表明,融入同伴并不会增加心理健康的耻辱感,反而会带来各种积极的结果。然而,这些成果在特定环境中的体现程度可能会有所不同。未来的研究应寻求确定支持积极成果实现的环境因素。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信