Iron changes within infarct tissue in ischemic stroke patients after successful reperfusion quantified using QSM.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Victoria Mercy Kataike, Patricia M Desmond, Christopher Steward, Peter J Mitchell, Christian Davey, Nawaf Yassi, Andrew Bivard, Mark W Parsons, Bruce C V Campbell, Felix Ng, Vijay Venkatraman
{"title":"Iron changes within infarct tissue in ischemic stroke patients after successful reperfusion quantified using QSM.","authors":"Victoria Mercy Kataike, Patricia M Desmond, Christopher Steward, Peter J Mitchell, Christian Davey, Nawaf Yassi, Andrew Bivard, Mark W Parsons, Bruce C V Campbell, Felix Ng, Vijay Venkatraman","doi":"10.1007/s00234-024-03444-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>For nearly half of patients who undergo Endovascular Thrombectomy following ischemic stroke, successful recanalisation does not guarantee a good outcome. Understanding the underlying tissue changes in the infarct tissue with the help of biomarkers specific to ischemic stroke could offer valuable insights for better treatment and patient management decisions. Using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) MRI to measure cerebral iron concentration, this study aims to track the progression of iron within the infarct lesion after successful reperfusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective study of 87 ischemic stroke patients, successfully reperfused patients underwent MRI scans at 24-to-72 h and 3 months after reperfusion. QSM maps were generated from gradient-echo MRI images. QSM values, measured in parts per billion (ppb), were extracted from ROIs defining the infarct and mirror homolog in the contralateral hemisphere and were compared cross-sectionally and longitudinally.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>QSM values in the infarct ROIs matched those of the contralateral ROIs at 24-to-72 h, expressed as median (interquartile range) ppb [0.71(-7.67-10.09) vs. 2.20(-10.50-14.05) ppb, p = 0.55], but were higher at 3 months [10.68(-2.30-21.10) vs. -1.27(-12.98-9.82) ppb, p < 0.001]. The infarct QSM values at 3 months were significantly higher than those at 24-to-72 h [10.41(-2.50-18.27) ppb vs. 1.68(-10.36-12.25) ppb, p < 0.001]. Infarct QSM at 24-to-72 h and patient outcome measured at three months did not demonstrate a significant association.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following successful endovascular reperfusion, iron concentration in infarct tissue, as measured by QSM increases over time compared to that in healthy tissue. However, its significance warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-024-03444-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: For nearly half of patients who undergo Endovascular Thrombectomy following ischemic stroke, successful recanalisation does not guarantee a good outcome. Understanding the underlying tissue changes in the infarct tissue with the help of biomarkers specific to ischemic stroke could offer valuable insights for better treatment and patient management decisions. Using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) MRI to measure cerebral iron concentration, this study aims to track the progression of iron within the infarct lesion after successful reperfusion.

Methods: In a prospective study of 87 ischemic stroke patients, successfully reperfused patients underwent MRI scans at 24-to-72 h and 3 months after reperfusion. QSM maps were generated from gradient-echo MRI images. QSM values, measured in parts per billion (ppb), were extracted from ROIs defining the infarct and mirror homolog in the contralateral hemisphere and were compared cross-sectionally and longitudinally.

Results: QSM values in the infarct ROIs matched those of the contralateral ROIs at 24-to-72 h, expressed as median (interquartile range) ppb [0.71(-7.67-10.09) vs. 2.20(-10.50-14.05) ppb, p = 0.55], but were higher at 3 months [10.68(-2.30-21.10) vs. -1.27(-12.98-9.82) ppb, p < 0.001]. The infarct QSM values at 3 months were significantly higher than those at 24-to-72 h [10.41(-2.50-18.27) ppb vs. 1.68(-10.36-12.25) ppb, p < 0.001]. Infarct QSM at 24-to-72 h and patient outcome measured at three months did not demonstrate a significant association.

Conclusion: Following successful endovascular reperfusion, iron concentration in infarct tissue, as measured by QSM increases over time compared to that in healthy tissue. However, its significance warrants further investigation.

Abstract Image

使用 QSM 定量缺血性中风患者成功再灌注后梗死组织内铁的变化。
目的:在缺血性脑卒中后接受血管内血栓切除术的患者中,近一半的患者不能保证成功再通。借助缺血性中风的特异性生物标记物了解梗塞组织的潜在组织变化可为更好的治疗和患者管理决策提供有价值的见解。本研究采用定量易感性图谱(QSM)磁共振成像技术测量脑铁浓度,旨在跟踪再灌注成功后梗死病灶内铁的进展情况:在一项针对 87 名缺血性脑卒中患者的前瞻性研究中,成功再灌注的患者在再灌注后 24 至 72 小时和 3 个月时接受了磁共振成像扫描。根据梯度回波磁共振成像生成 QSM 图。以十亿分之一(ppb)为单位的QSM值从界定梗死区和对侧半球镜像同源区的ROI中提取,并进行横向和纵向比较:结果:梗死ROI的QSM值与对侧ROI在24至72小时内的QSM值相匹配,以中位数(四分位间距)ppb表示[0.71(-7.67-10.09) vs. 2.20(-10.50-14.05) ppb, p = 0.55],但在3个月时更高[10.68(-2.30-21.10) vs. -1.27(-12.98-9.82) ppb, p 结论:血管内再灌注成功后,与健康组织相比,通过 QSM 测量的梗死组织中的铁浓度会随着时间的推移而增加。然而,其意义还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信