Growth at 2 years corrected age in preterm infants discharged on two different breast milk enhancements: An observational study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Brigitta Gehl, Richard Feinn, Kathleen Haines, Naveed Hussain, Shabnam Lainwala
{"title":"Growth at 2 years corrected age in preterm infants discharged on two different breast milk enhancements: An observational study.","authors":"Brigitta Gehl, Richard Feinn, Kathleen Haines, Naveed Hussain, Shabnam Lainwala","doi":"10.1002/jpn3.12341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Breast milk (BM) enhancement is often used to meet the nutritional needs of preterm infants after hospital discharge to achieve optimal growth. This study compared growth at 18-28 months corrected age (CA) among very preterm (VP) and very low birth weight (VLBW) infants discharged from the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) on two BM enhancements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review study of infants born between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017, with gestational age < 32 weeks or birthweight < 1500 g, discharged from the NICU on BM enhancements; fortification of BM with infant formula additives (BM-F) or unfortified BM supplemented with bottle feeds of infant formula (BM-S). BM enhancements were nonrandomized and determined by the medical team. A linear mixed model regression analysis with propensity score matching was used to estimate the adjusted associations between the nutrition plan at discharge and growth outcomes at 18-28 months CA follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and fifty-one VLBW/VP infants were included. Compared with BM-S, infants discharged on BM-F were more likely to continue receiving BM at 8-12 months CA, and had lower head circumference, weight-for-length z scores, and higher incidence of moderate malnutrition (p ≤ 0.01). After adjusting for confounders, discharge on BM-F was associated with a lower incidence of overweight/obesity at 18-28 months CA (odds interval: 0.45; confidence interval: 0.21-0.96; p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This retrospective study suggests that VLBW/VP infants discharged on BM-F received BM longer, had lower growth parameter and were less likely to be overweight/obese at 18-28 months CA. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of postdischarge nutrition on preterm born children's growth, metabolic disease, and neurodevelopmental outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.12341","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Breast milk (BM) enhancement is often used to meet the nutritional needs of preterm infants after hospital discharge to achieve optimal growth. This study compared growth at 18-28 months corrected age (CA) among very preterm (VP) and very low birth weight (VLBW) infants discharged from the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) on two BM enhancements.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review study of infants born between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017, with gestational age < 32 weeks or birthweight < 1500 g, discharged from the NICU on BM enhancements; fortification of BM with infant formula additives (BM-F) or unfortified BM supplemented with bottle feeds of infant formula (BM-S). BM enhancements were nonrandomized and determined by the medical team. A linear mixed model regression analysis with propensity score matching was used to estimate the adjusted associations between the nutrition plan at discharge and growth outcomes at 18-28 months CA follow-up.

Results: Two hundred and fifty-one VLBW/VP infants were included. Compared with BM-S, infants discharged on BM-F were more likely to continue receiving BM at 8-12 months CA, and had lower head circumference, weight-for-length z scores, and higher incidence of moderate malnutrition (p ≤ 0.01). After adjusting for confounders, discharge on BM-F was associated with a lower incidence of overweight/obesity at 18-28 months CA (odds interval: 0.45; confidence interval: 0.21-0.96; p = 0.04).

Conclusions: This retrospective study suggests that VLBW/VP infants discharged on BM-F received BM longer, had lower growth parameter and were less likely to be overweight/obese at 18-28 months CA. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of postdischarge nutrition on preterm born children's growth, metabolic disease, and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

使用两种不同母乳强化剂的早产儿 2 岁矫正期的生长情况:观察研究。
目的:母乳(BM)强化通常用于满足早产儿出院后的营养需求,以实现最佳生长。本研究比较了极早产儿(VP)和极低出生体重儿(VLBW)从新生儿重症监护室(NICU)出院后服用两种母乳强化剂在 18-28 个月矫正年龄(CA)时的生长情况:我们对 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间出生的婴儿进行了一项回顾性病历研究,研究对象为胎龄结果:共纳入 251 名 VLBW/VP 婴儿。与BM-S相比,接受BM-F出院的婴儿更有可能在8-12个月CA时继续接受BM,其头围、体重-身长Z评分更低,中度营养不良的发生率更高(P≤0.01)。在对混杂因素进行调整后,BM-F出院与18-28个月CA时超重/肥胖发生率较低有关(几率区间:0.45;置信区间:0.21-0.96;P = 0.04):这项回顾性研究表明,接受BM-F治疗的VLBW/VP婴儿接受BM的时间更长,生长参数更低,CA 18-28个月时超重/肥胖的可能性更小。还需要进一步研究来评估出院后营养对早产儿生长、代谢性疾病和神经发育结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.80%
发文量
467
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (JPGN) provides a forum for original papers and reviews dealing with pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, including normal and abnormal functions of the alimentary tract and its associated organs, including the salivary glands, pancreas, gallbladder, and liver. Particular emphasis is on development and its relation to infant and childhood nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信