Prerequisites for Clinical Implementation of Whole-Heart 4D-Flow MRI: A Delphi Analysis.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Joost van Schuppen, Annelies E van der Hulst, J Michiel den Harder, Lukas M Gottwald, Raschel D van Luijk, Josien C van den Noort, Jules L Nelissen, Casper F Coerkamp, S Matthijs Boekholdt, Paul F C Groot, Aart Nederveen, Pim van Ooij, R Nils Planken
{"title":"Prerequisites for Clinical Implementation of Whole-Heart 4D-Flow MRI: A Delphi Analysis.","authors":"Joost van Schuppen, Annelies E van der Hulst, J Michiel den Harder, Lukas M Gottwald, Raschel D van Luijk, Josien C van den Noort, Jules L Nelissen, Casper F Coerkamp, S Matthijs Boekholdt, Paul F C Groot, Aart Nederveen, Pim van Ooij, R Nils Planken","doi":"10.1002/jmri.29550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whole-heart 4D-flow MRI is a valuable tool for advanced visualization and quantification of blood flow in cardiovascular imaging. Despite advantages over 2D-phase-contrast flow, clinical implementation remains only partially exploited due to many hurdles in all steps, from image acquisition, reconstruction, postprocessing and analysis, clinical embedment, reporting, legislation, and regulation to data storage. The intent of this manuscript was 1) to evaluate the extent of clinical implementation of whole-heart 4D-flow MRI, 2) to identify hurdles hampering clinical implementation, and 3) to reach consensus on requirements for clinical implementation of whole-heart 4D-flow MRI. This study is based on Delphi analysis. This study involves a panel of 18 experts in the field on whole-heart 4D-flow MRI. The experience with and opinions of experts (mean 13 years of experience, interquartile range 6) in the field were aggregated. This study showed that among experts in the cardiovascular field, whole-heart 4D-flow MRI is currently used for both clinical and research purposes. Overall, the panelists agreed that major hurdles currently hamper implementation and utilization. The sequence-specific hurdles identified were long scan time and lack of standardization. Further hurdles included cumbersome and time-consuming segmentation and postprocessing. The study concludes that implementation of whole-heart 4D-flow MRI in clinical routine is feasible, but the implementation process is complex and requires a dedicated, multidisciplinary team. A predefined plan, including risk assessment and technique validation, is essential. The reported consensus statements may guide further tool development and facilitate broader implementation and clinical use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29550","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whole-heart 4D-flow MRI is a valuable tool for advanced visualization and quantification of blood flow in cardiovascular imaging. Despite advantages over 2D-phase-contrast flow, clinical implementation remains only partially exploited due to many hurdles in all steps, from image acquisition, reconstruction, postprocessing and analysis, clinical embedment, reporting, legislation, and regulation to data storage. The intent of this manuscript was 1) to evaluate the extent of clinical implementation of whole-heart 4D-flow MRI, 2) to identify hurdles hampering clinical implementation, and 3) to reach consensus on requirements for clinical implementation of whole-heart 4D-flow MRI. This study is based on Delphi analysis. This study involves a panel of 18 experts in the field on whole-heart 4D-flow MRI. The experience with and opinions of experts (mean 13 years of experience, interquartile range 6) in the field were aggregated. This study showed that among experts in the cardiovascular field, whole-heart 4D-flow MRI is currently used for both clinical and research purposes. Overall, the panelists agreed that major hurdles currently hamper implementation and utilization. The sequence-specific hurdles identified were long scan time and lack of standardization. Further hurdles included cumbersome and time-consuming segmentation and postprocessing. The study concludes that implementation of whole-heart 4D-flow MRI in clinical routine is feasible, but the implementation process is complex and requires a dedicated, multidisciplinary team. A predefined plan, including risk assessment and technique validation, is essential. The reported consensus statements may guide further tool development and facilitate broader implementation and clinical use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

全心 4D 流磁共振成像临床应用的先决条件:德尔菲分析。
全心四维血流磁共振成像是心血管成像中先进的可视化和量化血流的重要工具。尽管与二维相位对比血流相比具有优势,但由于从图像采集、重建、后处理和分析、临床嵌入、报告、立法和监管到数据存储等所有步骤中存在许多障碍,临床实施仍只能得到部分利用。本手稿的目的是:1)评估全心四维血流 MRI 的临床实施程度;2)确定阻碍临床实施的障碍;3)就全心四维血流 MRI 的临床实施要求达成共识。本研究以德尔菲分析法为基础。本研究由 18 位全心 4D 流磁共振成像领域的专家组成小组。专家们(平均从业年限 13 年,四分位数区间 6 年)在该领域的经验和意见得到了汇总。这项研究表明,在心血管领域的专家中,全心 4D 流磁共振成像目前已用于临床和研究目的。总体而言,专家小组成员一致认为,目前的主要障碍阻碍了实施和使用。针对序列的障碍包括扫描时间长和缺乏标准化。其他障碍包括繁琐耗时的分割和后处理。研究得出结论,在临床常规中实施全心 4D 流磁共振成像是可行的,但实施过程非常复杂,需要一个专门的多学科团队。包括风险评估和技术验证在内的预定计划至关重要。所报告的共识声明可指导进一步的工具开发,促进更广泛的实施和临床应用。证据等级:技术效率:第 5 阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信