Evaluation of YouTube as a Health Education Resource for Skin Graft Procedures.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Grant B Torres, Kimberley C Brondeel, Trey R Sledge, Bradley M Nus, Sai A Kamma, Kylie Wu, Ludwik K Branski
{"title":"Evaluation of YouTube as a Health Education Resource for Skin Graft Procedures.","authors":"Grant B Torres, Kimberley C Brondeel, Trey R Sledge, Bradley M Nus, Sai A Kamma, Kylie Wu, Ludwik K Branski","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent studies indicate that YouTube has become a primary source of healthcare information for patients. Videos about Skin Graft Procedures (SGP) on YouTube have accumulated millions of views, yet there lacks a publication investigating the educational quality of this content. With current literature revealing misleading healthcare information found on YouTube, this study aims to evaluate the educational quality of videos related to SGP. YouTube was searched for various terms such as \"Skin Graft Procedures\" and \"Skin Graft Surgery.\" One hundred and five videos were assessed, with 21 excluded. Four independent reviewers rated the material with the Global Quality Scale (GQS) (5 = highest quality, 1 = lowest quality) to judge educational value. Viewership, source, modality, and date of upload were also collected from each video and compiled for further analysis. The average GQS was 2.60 amongst all videos, with videos led by physicians recording significantly higher scores than those not led by physicians (P < .01). In comparing educational modalities, physician-led presentations provided the highest educational value, whereas live surgeries and consumer-friendly content contained low educational quality (P < .01). Assessing videos split into cohorts based on viewership noted a significantly higher GQS in videos with lower view counts (P < .05). Skin graft videos on YouTube largely provide low-quality information. Videos performed by physicians, particularly physician-led presentations, significantly improved the educational quality of skin graft content. Physicians must involve themselves in enhancing the quality of online content to better guide patients in navigating treatment options and making healthcare decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":"361-366"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies indicate that YouTube has become a primary source of healthcare information for patients. Videos about Skin Graft Procedures (SGP) on YouTube have accumulated millions of views, yet there lacks a publication investigating the educational quality of this content. With current literature revealing misleading healthcare information found on YouTube, this study aims to evaluate the educational quality of videos related to SGP. YouTube was searched for various terms such as "Skin Graft Procedures" and "Skin Graft Surgery." One hundred and five videos were assessed, with 21 excluded. Four independent reviewers rated the material with the Global Quality Scale (GQS) (5 = highest quality, 1 = lowest quality) to judge educational value. Viewership, source, modality, and date of upload were also collected from each video and compiled for further analysis. The average GQS was 2.60 amongst all videos, with videos led by physicians recording significantly higher scores than those not led by physicians (P < .01). In comparing educational modalities, physician-led presentations provided the highest educational value, whereas live surgeries and consumer-friendly content contained low educational quality (P < .01). Assessing videos split into cohorts based on viewership noted a significantly higher GQS in videos with lower view counts (P < .05). Skin graft videos on YouTube largely provide low-quality information. Videos performed by physicians, particularly physician-led presentations, significantly improved the educational quality of skin graft content. Physicians must involve themselves in enhancing the quality of online content to better guide patients in navigating treatment options and making healthcare decisions.

评估将 YouTube 作为皮肤移植手术健康教育资源的效果。
最近的研究表明,YouTube 已成为患者获取医疗保健信息的主要来源。YouTube上有关皮肤移植手术的视频已积累了数百万的浏览量,但却缺乏对这些内容的教育质量进行调查的出版物。鉴于目前的文献揭示了 YouTube 上存在误导性的医疗保健信息,本研究旨在评估与皮肤移植手术相关的视频的教育质量。研究人员在 YouTube 上搜索了 "皮肤移植手术 "和 "皮肤移植手术 "等多个关键词。对 105 个视频进行了评估,其中 21 个视频被排除在外。四位独立审查员采用全球质量量表(5 = 最高质量,1 = 最低质量)对材料进行评分,以判断其教育价值。此外,还收集了每段视频的收视率、来源、模式和上传日期,并进行了汇总,以便进一步分析。所有视频的平均 "全局质量量表 "为 2.60,由医生主导的视频得分明显高于非医生主导的视频(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信