The Associations Between Parenting Self-Efficacy and Parents’ Contributions to the Home-School Partnership Among Parents of Primary School Students: a Multilevel Meta-analysis

IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Tianyi Ma, Cassandra L. Tellegen, Julie Hodges, Matthew R. Sanders
{"title":"The Associations Between Parenting Self-Efficacy and Parents’ Contributions to the Home-School Partnership Among Parents of Primary School Students: a Multilevel Meta-analysis","authors":"Tianyi Ma, Cassandra L. Tellegen, Julie Hodges, Matthew R. Sanders","doi":"10.1007/s10648-024-09937-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>High-quality partnerships between families and schools can bring enormous benefits to the development, learning, and wellbeing of children. Decades of research has identified parenting self-efficacy as a key factor influencing parents’ contributions toward effective home-school partnerships. However, the strength of this association has varied significantly across studies with the aggregated strength remaining unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the associations between parenting self-efficacy and various aspects of parents’ contribution to the home-school partnership, namely home-based involvement, school-based involvement, home-school communication and relationships, as well as parental expectations and aspirations among parents of primary school students. Moderator effects were also examined. Through systematically searching six databases and screening papers, we included 50 independent studies involving 185 effect sizes (<i>N</i> = 20,043 children). Results showed a small to medium correlation between parenting self-efficacy and the multidimensional construct of home-school partnership outcomes (<i>r</i> = .189). The associations were stronger for education-focused parenting self-efficacy (<i>r</i> = .183) than general parenting self-efficacy (<i>r</i> = .114) and were stronger still for home-based participation (<i>r</i> = .248) and parental expectations and aspirations (<i>r</i> = .248) than school-based participation (<i>r</i> = .124) and parent-teacher communication/relationship (<i>r</i> = .090). We detected limited moderating effects of child gender, parent gender, ethnicity, sample type (general or targeted), and socio-economic status and publication bias. Overall, this meta-analysis provides evidence to support the positive relationship between parenting self-efficacy and parents’ contributions to the strength of the home-school partnership. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09937-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-quality partnerships between families and schools can bring enormous benefits to the development, learning, and wellbeing of children. Decades of research has identified parenting self-efficacy as a key factor influencing parents’ contributions toward effective home-school partnerships. However, the strength of this association has varied significantly across studies with the aggregated strength remaining unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the associations between parenting self-efficacy and various aspects of parents’ contribution to the home-school partnership, namely home-based involvement, school-based involvement, home-school communication and relationships, as well as parental expectations and aspirations among parents of primary school students. Moderator effects were also examined. Through systematically searching six databases and screening papers, we included 50 independent studies involving 185 effect sizes (N = 20,043 children). Results showed a small to medium correlation between parenting self-efficacy and the multidimensional construct of home-school partnership outcomes (r = .189). The associations were stronger for education-focused parenting self-efficacy (r = .183) than general parenting self-efficacy (r = .114) and were stronger still for home-based participation (r = .248) and parental expectations and aspirations (r = .248) than school-based participation (r = .124) and parent-teacher communication/relationship (r = .090). We detected limited moderating effects of child gender, parent gender, ethnicity, sample type (general or targeted), and socio-economic status and publication bias. Overall, this meta-analysis provides evidence to support the positive relationship between parenting self-efficacy and parents’ contributions to the strength of the home-school partnership. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Abstract Image

小学生家长的育儿自我效能感与家长对家校合作的贡献之间的关联:多层次元分析
家庭与学校之间高质量的合作关系可以为儿童的发展、学习和幸福带来巨大的好处。数十年的研究表明,家长的自我效能感是影响家长为有效的家校合作做出贡献的关键因素。然而,在不同的研究中,这种关联的强度差异很大,总体强度仍不明确。本荟萃分析旨在研究家长的自我效能感与家长对家校合作的各方面贡献之间的关联,即小学生家长的家庭参与、学校参与、家校沟通和关系,以及家长的期望和愿望。此外,还研究了调节效应。通过系统搜索六个数据库和筛选论文,我们纳入了 50 项独立研究,涉及 185 个效应大小(N = 20,043 名儿童)。结果显示,养育自我效能感与家庭-学校伙伴关系结果的多维建构之间存在小到中等的相关性(r = 0.189)。以教育为重点的养育自我效能感(r = .183)比一般的养育自我效能感(r = .114)更强,家庭参与(r = .248)和家长期望与愿望(r = .248)比学校参与(r = .124)和家长与教师沟通/关系(r = .090)更强。我们发现儿童性别、家长性别、种族、样本类型(一般或目标)、社会经济地位和出版偏差的调节作用有限。总之,这项荟萃分析提供的证据支持了养育自我效能感与家长对家校合作关系的贡献之间的积极关系。本文还讨论了未来研究的意义和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Psychology Review
Educational Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Educational Psychology Review aims to disseminate knowledge and promote dialogue within the field of educational psychology. It serves as a platform for the publication of various types of articles, including peer-reviewed integrative reviews, special thematic issues, reflections on previous research or new research directions, interviews, and research-based advice for practitioners. The journal caters to a diverse readership, ranging from generalists in educational psychology to experts in specific areas of the discipline. The content offers a comprehensive coverage of topics and provides in-depth information to meet the needs of both specialized researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信