Effect of biologic therapies on quality of life in severe asthma: Findings from the PRISM study

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
{"title":"Effect of biologic therapies on quality of life in severe asthma: Findings from the PRISM study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Anti-type 2 (T2) biologic therapies (biologics) improve exacerbation rates, lung function, and asthma-related quality of life (QoL) in patients with severe T2 asthma. However, studies comparing different biologics are lacking. We evaluated the QoL in patients with severe asthma comprehensively and compare the efficacy of different T2-directed biologics using QoL questionnaires.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We compared the QoL between severe and mild-to-moderate asthma and between severe asthma with and without biologics treatment. Data of mild-to-moderate were extracted from the Cohort for Reality and Evolution of Adult Asthma in Korea, and data of severe asthma were collected from the Precision Medicine Intervention in Severe Asthma. We included 183 patients with severe asthma treated with T2 biologics or conventional therapy between April 2020 and May 2021 and assessed QoL of them using the Questionnaire for Adult Korean Asthmatics (QLQAKA), Severe Asthma Questionnaire (SAQ), and EuroQoL-5Dimensions (EQ-5D) at baseline and 6 months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The EQ-5D index (0.803) of severe asthma was lower than that of other chronic diseases representing a worse QoL. The scores for all questions of QLQAKA, except “cough,” were lower (less control) in the severe asthma group than in the mild-to-moderate asthma group at baseline and 6 months (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). The total scores and subscores of all domains of the QLQAKA, SAQ, and EQ-5D improved significantly 6 months after biologic therapy but not after conventional therapy. The total QLQAKA, SAQ, and EQ-5D scores improved after 6 months in the anti-IL-5 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) and anti-IL-4/IL-13 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) treatment groups with no significant difference between groups (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>QoL was worse in severe asthma than in mild-to-moderate asthma and other chronic diseases. T2 biologics equally improved QoL in patients with severe asthma.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54295,"journal":{"name":"World Allergy Organization Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939455124000887/pdfft?md5=ff4eb96c06bff5c16bd0b552f1cd6e80&pid=1-s2.0-S1939455124000887-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Allergy Organization Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939455124000887","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Anti-type 2 (T2) biologic therapies (biologics) improve exacerbation rates, lung function, and asthma-related quality of life (QoL) in patients with severe T2 asthma. However, studies comparing different biologics are lacking. We evaluated the QoL in patients with severe asthma comprehensively and compare the efficacy of different T2-directed biologics using QoL questionnaires.

Methods

We compared the QoL between severe and mild-to-moderate asthma and between severe asthma with and without biologics treatment. Data of mild-to-moderate were extracted from the Cohort for Reality and Evolution of Adult Asthma in Korea, and data of severe asthma were collected from the Precision Medicine Intervention in Severe Asthma. We included 183 patients with severe asthma treated with T2 biologics or conventional therapy between April 2020 and May 2021 and assessed QoL of them using the Questionnaire for Adult Korean Asthmatics (QLQAKA), Severe Asthma Questionnaire (SAQ), and EuroQoL-5Dimensions (EQ-5D) at baseline and 6 months.

Results

The EQ-5D index (0.803) of severe asthma was lower than that of other chronic diseases representing a worse QoL. The scores for all questions of QLQAKA, except “cough,” were lower (less control) in the severe asthma group than in the mild-to-moderate asthma group at baseline and 6 months (P < 0.05). The total scores and subscores of all domains of the QLQAKA, SAQ, and EQ-5D improved significantly 6 months after biologic therapy but not after conventional therapy. The total QLQAKA, SAQ, and EQ-5D scores improved after 6 months in the anti-IL-5 (P < 0.05) and anti-IL-4/IL-13 (P < 0.05) treatment groups with no significant difference between groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

QoL was worse in severe asthma than in mild-to-moderate asthma and other chronic diseases. T2 biologics equally improved QoL in patients with severe asthma.

生物疗法对重症哮喘患者生活质量的影响:PRISM 研究结果
背景抗 2 型(T2)生物制剂疗法(生物制剂)可改善严重 2 型哮喘患者的病情恶化率、肺功能和哮喘相关生活质量(QoL)。然而,目前还缺乏比较不同生物制剂的研究。我们对重症哮喘患者的 QoL 进行了全面评估,并使用 QoL 问卷比较了不同 T2 定向生物制剂的疗效。轻度至中度哮喘的数据来自韩国成人哮喘现实与演变队列,重度哮喘的数据来自重度哮喘精准医学干预。我们在2020年4月至2021年5月期间纳入了183名接受T2生物制剂或传统疗法治疗的重症哮喘患者,并在基线和6个月时使用韩国成人哮喘患者问卷(QLQAKA)、重症哮喘问卷(SAQ)和欧洲QoL-5维度(EQ-5D)对他们的QoL进行了评估。在基线和 6 个月时,除 "咳嗽 "外,重度哮喘组所有 QLQAKA 问题的得分均低于轻中度哮喘组(P < 0.05)。生物制剂治疗 6 个月后,QLQAKA、SAQ 和 EQ-5D 所有领域的总分和分值均有显著改善,而常规治疗后则没有。抗IL-5(P< 0.05)和抗IL-4/IL-13(P< 0.05)治疗组的QLQAKA、SAQ和EQ-5D总分在6个月后均有改善,组间差异不显著(P> 0.05)。T2生物制剂同样能改善重度哮喘患者的 QoL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Allergy Organization Journal
World Allergy Organization Journal Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
91
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The official pubication of the World Allergy Organization, the World Allergy Organization Journal (WAOjournal) publishes original mechanistic, translational, and clinical research on the topics of allergy, asthma, anaphylaxis, and clincial immunology, as well as reviews, guidelines, and position papers that contribute to the improvement of patient care. WAOjournal publishes research on the growth of allergy prevalence within the scope of single countries, country comparisons, and practical global issues and regulations, or threats to the allergy specialty. The Journal invites the submissions of all authors interested in publishing on current global problems in allergy, asthma, anaphylaxis, and immunology. Of particular interest are the immunological consequences of climate change and the subsequent systematic transformations in food habits and their consequences for the allergy/immunology discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信