Consumer eating quality and physicochemical traits of pork Longissimus and Semimembranosus differed between genetic lines

IF 7.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
{"title":"Consumer eating quality and physicochemical traits of pork Longissimus and Semimembranosus differed between genetic lines","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pork eating quality is affected by various factors. In this study, <em>Longissimus thoracis et lumborum</em> (LTL) and <em>Semimembranosus</em> (SM) muscles from seven genetic lines (PM-LR – Pure maternal, Landrace-type; PM-LW – Pure maternal, Large White-type; PM-D – Pure maternal, Duroc-type; PT-D – Pure terminal, Duroc-type; PT-LW – Pure terminal, Large White-type; PT-LR - Pure Terminal, Landrace-type; Comp-P × LW × D - Composite Terminal – Pietran × Large white × Duroc) were analyzed for pH, intramuscular fat (IMF) content, and collagen content and solubility. A consumer sensory test using check-all-that-apply (CATA) and biometric approaches was also conducted. The results showed that the IMF content of line PM-D was the highest (<em>P</em> = 0.004), while line PT-LW received the highest score in tenderness, liking of flavor, purchase intent, and quality grading (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Line PM-LR and PT-LR showed the lowest IMF content and were least preferred by consumers. Compared to LTL, SM showed higher pH, collagen solubility, and sensory scores in tenderness, juiciness, liking of flavor, and overall liking (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Different muscles and lines were associated with different CATA terms but not with differences in consumer emotional responses. pH positively influenced tenderness, juiciness, and overall liking (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), but IMF and collagen had little effect. The flavor was the most important sensory attribute contributing to overall liking, followed by tenderness. Genetic line and muscle affected pork chemical properties and eating quality. The findings are important for the Australian pork industry to improve the eating quality of their products.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":389,"journal":{"name":"Meat Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309174024002080","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pork eating quality is affected by various factors. In this study, Longissimus thoracis et lumborum (LTL) and Semimembranosus (SM) muscles from seven genetic lines (PM-LR – Pure maternal, Landrace-type; PM-LW – Pure maternal, Large White-type; PM-D – Pure maternal, Duroc-type; PT-D – Pure terminal, Duroc-type; PT-LW – Pure terminal, Large White-type; PT-LR - Pure Terminal, Landrace-type; Comp-P × LW × D - Composite Terminal – Pietran × Large white × Duroc) were analyzed for pH, intramuscular fat (IMF) content, and collagen content and solubility. A consumer sensory test using check-all-that-apply (CATA) and biometric approaches was also conducted. The results showed that the IMF content of line PM-D was the highest (P = 0.004), while line PT-LW received the highest score in tenderness, liking of flavor, purchase intent, and quality grading (P < 0.05). Line PM-LR and PT-LR showed the lowest IMF content and were least preferred by consumers. Compared to LTL, SM showed higher pH, collagen solubility, and sensory scores in tenderness, juiciness, liking of flavor, and overall liking (P < 0.05). Different muscles and lines were associated with different CATA terms but not with differences in consumer emotional responses. pH positively influenced tenderness, juiciness, and overall liking (P < 0.05), but IMF and collagen had little effect. The flavor was the most important sensory attribute contributing to overall liking, followed by tenderness. Genetic line and muscle affected pork chemical properties and eating quality. The findings are important for the Australian pork industry to improve the eating quality of their products.

不同基因品系猪肉的消费者食用品质和理化性状差异
猪肉的食用品质受多种因素影响。在这项研究中,7 个遗传品系(PM-LR - 纯母本,兰德瑞斯型;PM-LW - 纯母本,大白型;PM-D - 纯母本,杜洛克型;PT-D - 纯终端,杜洛克型;PT-LW - 纯终端,大白型;PT-LR - 纯终端,兰德瑞斯型;Comp-P × LW × D - 复合终端 - 杜洛克型;PT-LW - 纯终端,大白型;PT-LR - 纯终端,兰德瑞斯型;Comp-P × LW × D - 复合终端 - 杜洛克型;PT-LW--纯终端,大白型;PT-LR--纯终端,兰道尔型;Comp-P × LW × D--复合终端--皮特兰×大白×杜洛克)的 pH 值、肌内脂肪(IMF)含量、胶原蛋白含量和溶解度进行了分析。此外,还采用 "检查即应用"(CATA)和生物统计学方法进行了消费者感官测试。结果表明,品系 PM-D 的 IMF 含量最高(P = 0.004),而品系 PT-LW 在嫩度、风味喜好度、购买意向和质量分级方面得分最高(P < 0.05)。PM-LR和PT-LR品系的IMF含量最低,最不受消费者青睐。与LTL相比,SM的pH值、胶原蛋白溶解度以及在嫩度、多汁性、风味喜爱度和总体喜爱度方面的感官评分更高(P < 0.05)。pH值对嫩度、多汁性和总体喜欢程度有积极影响(P <0.05),但IMF和胶原蛋白影响不大。风味是影响总体喜好的最重要感官属性,其次是嫩度。遗传系和肌肉影响猪肉的化学特性和食用品质。这些发现对澳大利亚猪肉业提高其产品的食用品质非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Meat Science
Meat Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
282
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Meat Science is to serve as a suitable platform for the dissemination of interdisciplinary and international knowledge on all factors influencing the properties of meat. While the journal primarily focuses on the flesh of mammals, contributions related to poultry will be considered if they enhance the overall understanding of the relationship between muscle nature and meat quality post mortem. Additionally, papers on large birds (e.g., emus, ostriches) as well as wild-captured mammals and crocodiles will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信