Pathways for the US food processing sector under economy-wide net zero in a multisector dynamic framework

IF 5.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Siddarth Durga, Simone Speizer, Xin Zhao, Stephanie Waldoff, Jae Edmonds
{"title":"Pathways for the US food processing sector under economy-wide net zero in a multisector dynamic framework","authors":"Siddarth Durga,&nbsp;Simone Speizer,&nbsp;Xin Zhao,&nbsp;Stephanie Waldoff,&nbsp;Jae Edmonds","doi":"10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The food processing sector is a large, energy-consuming and CO<sub>2-</sub>emitting industrial sector. The sector was estimated to account for 6 % of US industrial CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in 2020. The sector uses significant amounts of fossil fuels, biomass, and electricity to perform a range of operations such as baking, drying, and refrigeration. Additionally, the sector is tightly linked to the agriculture and land use sectors. In this analysis, we use the Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM), a coupled, energy-economy-agriculture-land-use-water-climate systems model, to examine the role of the food processing sector in the EMF37 2050 US net-zero CO<sub>2</sub> scenario. We explore the implications for technology and fuel choice and go beyond to examine US food consumption, food prices, and land-use change. To better understand the sensitivity of our results to alternative developments, we assess multiple sensitivity scenarios for the US and other world regions, with a focus on varied food processing energy intensity pathways.</p><p>We find that along the EMF37 US net-zero path, the food processing sector electrifies the majority of its process heat. We also find that the industry phases-down natural gas use and completely phases-out coal. Additionally, we observe a marginal decrease in US food consumption per capita relative to our reference scenario. This primarily occurs due to the increase in consumer food prices resulting from increased demand for purpose-grown biomass crops, which compete with food crops for land resources. Finally, cumulative energy savings of 4.2 EJ are achieved from 2020 to 2050 in a scenario in which the US reduces its food processing intensity to EU-15 levels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72914,"journal":{"name":"Energy and climate change","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100150"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278724000266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The food processing sector is a large, energy-consuming and CO2-emitting industrial sector. The sector was estimated to account for 6 % of US industrial CO2 emissions in 2020. The sector uses significant amounts of fossil fuels, biomass, and electricity to perform a range of operations such as baking, drying, and refrigeration. Additionally, the sector is tightly linked to the agriculture and land use sectors. In this analysis, we use the Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM), a coupled, energy-economy-agriculture-land-use-water-climate systems model, to examine the role of the food processing sector in the EMF37 2050 US net-zero CO2 scenario. We explore the implications for technology and fuel choice and go beyond to examine US food consumption, food prices, and land-use change. To better understand the sensitivity of our results to alternative developments, we assess multiple sensitivity scenarios for the US and other world regions, with a focus on varied food processing energy intensity pathways.

We find that along the EMF37 US net-zero path, the food processing sector electrifies the majority of its process heat. We also find that the industry phases-down natural gas use and completely phases-out coal. Additionally, we observe a marginal decrease in US food consumption per capita relative to our reference scenario. This primarily occurs due to the increase in consumer food prices resulting from increased demand for purpose-grown biomass crops, which compete with food crops for land resources. Finally, cumulative energy savings of 4.2 EJ are achieved from 2020 to 2050 in a scenario in which the US reduces its food processing intensity to EU-15 levels.

多部门动态框架下全经济净零条件下美国食品加工业的发展路径
食品加工业是一个耗能大、二氧化碳排放量高的工业部门。据估计,2020 年该行业将占美国工业二氧化碳排放量的 6%。该部门使用大量化石燃料、生物质和电力来进行烘烤、干燥和冷藏等一系列操作。此外,该行业还与农业和土地利用行业密切相关。在本分析中,我们使用全球变化分析模型 (GCAM)(一个能源-经济-农业-土地利用-水-气候的耦合系统模型)来研究食品加工行业在 EMF37 2050 美国二氧化碳净零排放情景中的作用。我们探讨了技术和燃料选择的影响,并进一步研究了美国的食品消费、食品价格和土地利用变化。为了更好地理解我们的结果对其他发展的敏感性,我们评估了美国和世界其他地区的多种敏感性情景,重点关注不同的食品加工能源强度路径。我们还发现,该行业逐步减少天然气的使用,并完全淘汰煤炭。此外,与参考情景相比,我们发现美国人均食品消耗量略有下降。这主要是由于对专门种植的生物质农作物的需求增加导致消费者食品价格上涨,而生物质农作物与粮食作物争夺土地资源。最后,在美国将其食品加工强度降低到欧盟 15 国水平的情景下,从 2020 年到 2050 年可累计节约 4.2 EJ 能源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and climate change
Energy and climate change Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信