Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes After Hepatic Artery Reconstruction in Pediatric Liver Transplantation Using a Microscope Versus Surgical Loupe

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes After Hepatic Artery Reconstruction in Pediatric Liver Transplantation Using a Microscope Versus Surgical Loupe","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.08.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To review the impact of the operating microscope (OM) for reconstruction of the hepatic artery (HA) by comparing the outcomes with standard loupe reconstruction (SL) in pediatric liver transplantation (LT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Studies comparing the application of OM and SL for the reconstruction of the HA in primary pediatric LT were included from a systematic search of MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and EMBASE from inception to June 2022. Re-transplantation, dual grafts and auxiliary transplants were excluded. Primary outcome was the rate of HA thrombosis (HAT). Secondary outcomes were graft loss and mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 1261 liver recipients from 9 included studies published until June 2022. There were 484 patients in the OM group and 777 patients in the SL group. HAT incidence with OM was significantly lower with OR = 0.18 (95% CI: 0.07-0.48). The 1-year graft survival was significantly better in the OM group with OR = 2.77 (95% CI: 1.13-6.80). 1-year overall mortality was also significantly lower with OM with OR = 0.39 (0.18-0.86). The use of OM did not significantly impact the incidence of HAT in the living donor liver transplant subgroup. Differences in time for hepatic HA reconstruction, total operating time and length of hospital stay did not reach statistical significance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The use of OM has reduced the risk of HAT, graft loss and mortality in pediatric liver transplantation. Adoption of microsurgical principles in general may have contributed to the improved outcomes with SL reconstruction of HA in pediatric LT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524004251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To review the impact of the operating microscope (OM) for reconstruction of the hepatic artery (HA) by comparing the outcomes with standard loupe reconstruction (SL) in pediatric liver transplantation (LT).

Methods

Studies comparing the application of OM and SL for the reconstruction of the HA in primary pediatric LT were included from a systematic search of MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and EMBASE from inception to June 2022. Re-transplantation, dual grafts and auxiliary transplants were excluded. Primary outcome was the rate of HA thrombosis (HAT). Secondary outcomes were graft loss and mortality.

Results

There were 1261 liver recipients from 9 included studies published until June 2022. There were 484 patients in the OM group and 777 patients in the SL group. HAT incidence with OM was significantly lower with OR = 0.18 (95% CI: 0.07-0.48). The 1-year graft survival was significantly better in the OM group with OR = 2.77 (95% CI: 1.13-6.80). 1-year overall mortality was also significantly lower with OM with OR = 0.39 (0.18-0.86). The use of OM did not significantly impact the incidence of HAT in the living donor liver transplant subgroup. Differences in time for hepatic HA reconstruction, total operating time and length of hospital stay did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion

The use of OM has reduced the risk of HAT, graft loss and mortality in pediatric liver transplantation. Adoption of microsurgical principles in general may have contributed to the improved outcomes with SL reconstruction of HA in pediatric LT.

小儿肝移植中使用显微镜与手术放大镜进行肝动脉重建后疗效的系统性回顾和荟萃分析
背景:通过比较小儿肝移植(LT)中手术显微镜(OM)与标准放大镜重建(SL)的结果,回顾手术显微镜(OM)对肝动脉(HA)重建的影响:方法:通过系统检索MEDLINE、Cochrane Library和EMBASE,纳入了从开始到2022年6月期间比较OM和SL在小儿LT中重建肝动脉应用的研究。不包括再移植、双移植和辅助移植。主要结果是HA血栓形成率(HAT)。次要结果为移植物丢失率和死亡率:结果:截至2022年6月发表的9项纳入研究中共有1261名肝脏受者。OM组有484名患者,SL组有777名患者。OM组的HAT发生率明显较低,OR=0.18(95% CI:0.07-0.48)。OM组的1年移植物存活率明显更高,OR=2.77(95% CI:1.13-6.80)。OM组的1年总死亡率也明显较低,OR=0.39(0.18-0.86)。在活体肝移植亚组中,OM的使用对HAT的发生率没有明显影响。肝脏HA重建时间、总手术时间和住院时间的差异没有统计学意义:结论:显微外科手术的使用降低了小儿肝移植中HAT、移植物损失和死亡率的风险。采用显微外科原则可能有助于改善小儿肝移植中肝脏HA的SL重建效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation proceedings
Transplantation proceedings 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
502
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics. Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board. Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信