Efficacy, Safety, and Early Relapse After Cessation of Upadacitinib Versus Dupilumab in Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis®: A Real-World Study in China.

Abstract

Background: The efficacy and safety of upadacitinib and dupilumab for atopic Dermatitis® (AD) in adolescent patients have been proven in clinical trials. However, few daily practice studies comparing agents have been conducted in this patient population. Objectives: This single-center retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the efficacy, safety, and early relapse after cessation of upadacitinib and dupilumab for moderate-to-severe AD in Chinese adolescents. Methods: A retrospective study collected data on a cohort of 83 adolescent patients receiving upadacitinib or dupilumab from October 2021 to October 2023. This study comprised two main emphases. The first main emphasis involved the treatment phase, where the efficacy and safety of the two treatments were evaluated. Primary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving an improvement of ≥50%, ≥75%, and ≥90% in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) from baseline (EASI-50, EASI-75, EASI-90) and the proportion of patients achieving Validated Investigator Global Assessment (vIGA) 0/1 at week 4 and week 40. In the second main emphasis, AD recurrence after treatment discontinuation was assessed in the two treatment groups. The median time to relapse was calculated. Results: A total of 83 patients were enrolled. At week 4, the proportion of patients achieving the primary endpoints, including EASI-75 and EASI-90, was substantially higher with upadacitinib than with dupilumab (51.5% vs 14.0% [P < 0.001], 18.2% vs 2.0% [P < 0.05]). However, at week 40, higher proportion of patients on dupilumab were reaching EASI-50 and EASI-75 and vIGA 0/1. After the discontinuation of dupilumab or upadacitinib therapy, the Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the median time to relapse was 270 days in the dupilumab group and 18 days in the upadacitinib group. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that upadacitinib has superior short-term efficacy over dupilumab in adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD, whereas dupilumab trends toward better long-term remission over upadacitinib under the condition of treatment discontinuation in some patients.