Do Adductor Tenotomies Prevent Progressive Migration in Children with Cerebral Palsy?: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.4 Q2 SURGERY
JBJS Reviews Pub Date : 2024-08-20 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00093
Renée Anne van Stralen, Merel Charlotte Rosalie Roelen, Pranai Buddhdev, Max Reijman, Denise Eygendaal, Jaap Johannes Tolk
{"title":"Do Adductor Tenotomies Prevent Progressive Migration in Children with Cerebral Palsy?: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Renée Anne van Stralen, Merel Charlotte Rosalie Roelen, Pranai Buddhdev, Max Reijman, Denise Eygendaal, Jaap Johannes Tolk","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Up to one-third of children with cerebral palsy (CP) develop migration of the hip, and the risk increases with a higher Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). In progressive hip migration in young children, adductor tenotomy is an accepted treatment option to delay or prevent progressive hip migration. However, there is quite a large variability in reported results. This systematic review aims to determine the effectiveness of a soft-tissue release in the prevention of progressive hip migration in children with CP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statements. Our inclusion criteria were studies describing pediatric, skeletally immature patients with CP and a \"hip at risk\" of progressive hip migration. Exclusion criteria were simultaneous bony reconstructions, case reports, technical notes, published abstracts, or studies with a follow-up under 1 year postoperatively. The primary outcomes were defined as failure rate (progressive hip migration and/or need for bony surgery, as defined by each paper) and change in migration percentage (MP) at final follow-up. As secondary analyses, we evaluated the outcome after specific subtypes of surgeries and assessed whether performing lengthening of iliopsoas, neurectomy of the anterior branch of the obturator nerve, age at the time of surgery, GMFCS level, and postoperative management impact the outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our literature search identified 380 titles. Eighty-four articles underwent full-text review, of which 27 met our inclusion/exclusion criteria and were subsequently selected for quantitative analysis. A prevalence meta-analysis was performed including 17 studies (2,213 hips). Mean follow-up ranged from 12 to 148.8 months. The mean preoperative MP was 33.4% (2,740 hips) and 29.9% at follow-up. The overall reported failure rate was 39% (95% confidence interval, 26%-52%). Performing a release of only adductor longus had a failure rate of 87%, whereas more extensive soft-tissue releases showed significantly better results with failure rates ranging from 0 to 44% (p < 0.001). Lengthening of the iliopsoas had no significant impact on failure rate (p = 0.48), nor did performing an obturator neurectomy (p = 0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The failure rate of adductor tenotomies to prevent progressive hip migration appears to be as high as 39% in studies with a varying follow-up. The failure rates are significantly higher when isolated release of the adductor longus is performed. This systematic review supports clinical decision making in children with CP and early hip migration.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IIA. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47098,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Reviews","volume":"12 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11328925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Up to one-third of children with cerebral palsy (CP) develop migration of the hip, and the risk increases with a higher Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). In progressive hip migration in young children, adductor tenotomy is an accepted treatment option to delay or prevent progressive hip migration. However, there is quite a large variability in reported results. This systematic review aims to determine the effectiveness of a soft-tissue release in the prevention of progressive hip migration in children with CP.

Methods: This systematic review was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statements. Our inclusion criteria were studies describing pediatric, skeletally immature patients with CP and a "hip at risk" of progressive hip migration. Exclusion criteria were simultaneous bony reconstructions, case reports, technical notes, published abstracts, or studies with a follow-up under 1 year postoperatively. The primary outcomes were defined as failure rate (progressive hip migration and/or need for bony surgery, as defined by each paper) and change in migration percentage (MP) at final follow-up. As secondary analyses, we evaluated the outcome after specific subtypes of surgeries and assessed whether performing lengthening of iliopsoas, neurectomy of the anterior branch of the obturator nerve, age at the time of surgery, GMFCS level, and postoperative management impact the outcome.

Results: Our literature search identified 380 titles. Eighty-four articles underwent full-text review, of which 27 met our inclusion/exclusion criteria and were subsequently selected for quantitative analysis. A prevalence meta-analysis was performed including 17 studies (2,213 hips). Mean follow-up ranged from 12 to 148.8 months. The mean preoperative MP was 33.4% (2,740 hips) and 29.9% at follow-up. The overall reported failure rate was 39% (95% confidence interval, 26%-52%). Performing a release of only adductor longus had a failure rate of 87%, whereas more extensive soft-tissue releases showed significantly better results with failure rates ranging from 0 to 44% (p < 0.001). Lengthening of the iliopsoas had no significant impact on failure rate (p = 0.48), nor did performing an obturator neurectomy (p = 0.92).

Conclusion: The failure rate of adductor tenotomies to prevent progressive hip migration appears to be as high as 39% in studies with a varying follow-up. The failure rates are significantly higher when isolated release of the adductor longus is performed. This systematic review supports clinical decision making in children with CP and early hip migration.

Level of evidence: Level IIA. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

内收肌腱鞘切开术能预防脑瘫儿童的进行性移位吗?系统回顾
背景:多达三分之一的脑性瘫痪(CP)患儿会出现髋关节移位,而且随着粗大运动功能分级系统(GMFCS)的提高,患儿髋关节移位的风险也会增加。对于进行性髋关节移位的幼儿,内收肌腱鞘切除术是一种公认的治疗方法,可延缓或预防进行性髋关节移位。然而,报告的结果差异很大。本系统性综述旨在确定软组织松解术在预防CP儿童进行性髋关节移位方面的有效性:本系统性综述根据《科克伦系统性综述手册》和《系统性综述和元分析协议首选报告项目》的指导原则进行。我们的纳入标准是描述患有CP和 "髋关节有进行性髋关节移位风险 "的小儿、骨骼不成熟患者的研究。排除标准为同时进行骨性重建、病例报告、技术说明、发表的摘要或术后随访不足一年的研究。主要结果定义为失败率(根据每篇论文的定义,髋关节进行性移位和/或需要进行骨性手术)和最终随访时移位百分比(MP)的变化。作为次要分析,我们评估了特定亚型手术后的结果,并评估了髂腰肌延长术、闭孔神经前支神经切除术、手术时的年龄、GMFCS水平和术后管理是否会影响结果:我们的文献检索发现了 380 篇文章。84篇文章进行了全文审阅,其中27篇符合我们的纳入/排除标准,随后被选中进行定量分析。我们进行了一项患病率荟萃分析,其中包括 17 项研究(2213 个髋关节)。平均随访时间从 12 个月到 148.8 个月不等。术前平均 MP 为 33.4%(2,740 个髋关节),随访时为 29.9%。报告的总体失败率为 39%(95% 置信区间,26%-52%)。仅对内收肌进行松解的失败率为 87%,而更广泛的软组织松解则显示出明显更好的效果,失败率从 0% 到 44% 不等(P < 0.001)。髂腰肌的延长对失败率没有显著影响(p = 0.48),进行闭孔神经切除术也没有显著影响(p = 0.92):结论:在随访时间不同的研究中,为防止髋关节进行性移位而进行内收肌腱鞘切开术的失败率似乎高达39%。在进行内收肌孤立松解术时,失败率明显更高。本系统性综述为CP和早期髋关节移位患儿的临床决策提供支持:证据等级:IIA级。有关证据级别的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBJS Reviews
JBJS Reviews SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: JBJS Reviews is an innovative review journal from the publishers of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. This continuously published online journal provides comprehensive, objective, and authoritative review articles written by recognized experts in the field. Edited by Thomas A. Einhorn, MD, and a distinguished Editorial Board, each issue of JBJS Reviews, updates the orthopaedic community on important topics in a concise, time-saving manner, providing expert insights into orthopaedic research and clinical experience. Comprehensive reviews, special features, and integrated CME provide orthopaedic surgeons with valuable perspectives on surgical practice and the latest advances in the field within twelve subspecialty areas: Basic Science, Education & Training, Elbow, Ethics, Foot & Ankle, Hand & Wrist, Hip, Infection, Knee, Oncology, Pediatrics, Pain Management, Rehabilitation, Shoulder, Spine, Sports Medicine, Trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信