Differences in the Size of Individual Plantar Intrinsic Foot Muscles Between Ballet Dancers and Non-Dancers.

IF 1.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Hiroshi Fukuyama, Sumiaki Maeo, Yuki Kusagawa, Takashi Sugiyama, Hiroaki Kanehisa, Tadao Isaka
{"title":"Differences in the Size of Individual Plantar Intrinsic Foot Muscles Between Ballet Dancers and Non-Dancers.","authors":"Hiroshi Fukuyama, Sumiaki Maeo, Yuki Kusagawa, Takashi Sugiyama, Hiroaki Kanehisa, Tadao Isaka","doi":"10.1177/1089313X241273887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In classic ballet, choreography often involves tiptoe standing. Tiptoe standing requires a high and stable foot arch structure, which is achieved by contraction of the plantar intrinsic foot muscles (PIFMs). Long-term repetitive loading with a specific movement can induce hypertrophic adaptation of the associated muscles. For dancers, however, limited information on the size of individual PIFMs is available from previous studies. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in the sizes of 10 individual PIFMs between dancers and non-dancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Muscle volumes (MVs) of 10 individual PIFMs were measured using magnetic resonance imaging in 15 female dancers and 15 female non-dancers. Muscles analyzed included abductor hallucis, flexor digitorum brevis, abductor digiti minimi, quadratus plantae, lumbricals, flexor hallucis brevis, adductor hallucis oblique head, adductor hallucis transverse head, flexor digiti minimi, plantar/dorsal interossei. In addition to absolute MVs, relative MVs normalized to body mass (rMV<sub>BM</sub>) and the percentage of individual MVs relative to the sum of 10 individual PIFM MVs (%MV<sub>WHOLE</sub>) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The absolute MVs of 6 individual PIFMs, including the flexor digitorum brevis and lumbricals, were +16% to 59% larger in dancers than in non-dancers (P ≤ .048). The rMV<sub>BM</sub> of all individual PIFMs were +35% to 95% larger in dancers than in non-dancers (P ≤ .019). The %MV<sub>WHOLE</sub> of the flexor digitorum brevis and lumbricals were +10% to 36% higher (P ≤ .014) and those of the abductor digiti minimi and adductor hallucis oblique head were +8% to 11% lower (P ≤ .037) in dancers than in non-dancers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For all 3 MV measures, only the flexor digitorum brevis and lumbricals, which are functionally specialized for flexion of the second to fifth metatarsophalangeal joints, were consistently larger in dancers than in non-dancers. This may be due to long-term repetitive loading on these PIFMs during ballet training involving tiptoe standing.</p>","PeriodicalId":46421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","volume":" ","pages":"1089313X241273887"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dance Medicine & Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1089313X241273887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In classic ballet, choreography often involves tiptoe standing. Tiptoe standing requires a high and stable foot arch structure, which is achieved by contraction of the plantar intrinsic foot muscles (PIFMs). Long-term repetitive loading with a specific movement can induce hypertrophic adaptation of the associated muscles. For dancers, however, limited information on the size of individual PIFMs is available from previous studies. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in the sizes of 10 individual PIFMs between dancers and non-dancers.

Methods: Muscle volumes (MVs) of 10 individual PIFMs were measured using magnetic resonance imaging in 15 female dancers and 15 female non-dancers. Muscles analyzed included abductor hallucis, flexor digitorum brevis, abductor digiti minimi, quadratus plantae, lumbricals, flexor hallucis brevis, adductor hallucis oblique head, adductor hallucis transverse head, flexor digiti minimi, plantar/dorsal interossei. In addition to absolute MVs, relative MVs normalized to body mass (rMVBM) and the percentage of individual MVs relative to the sum of 10 individual PIFM MVs (%MVWHOLE) were calculated.

Results: The absolute MVs of 6 individual PIFMs, including the flexor digitorum brevis and lumbricals, were +16% to 59% larger in dancers than in non-dancers (P ≤ .048). The rMVBM of all individual PIFMs were +35% to 95% larger in dancers than in non-dancers (P ≤ .019). The %MVWHOLE of the flexor digitorum brevis and lumbricals were +10% to 36% higher (P ≤ .014) and those of the abductor digiti minimi and adductor hallucis oblique head were +8% to 11% lower (P ≤ .037) in dancers than in non-dancers.

Conclusions: For all 3 MV measures, only the flexor digitorum brevis and lumbricals, which are functionally specialized for flexion of the second to fifth metatarsophalangeal joints, were consistently larger in dancers than in non-dancers. This may be due to long-term repetitive loading on these PIFMs during ballet training involving tiptoe standing.

芭蕾舞演员与非芭蕾舞演员足底内侧肌肉个体大小的差异。
简介在经典芭蕾舞中,舞蹈编排经常涉及踮脚站立。踮脚需要高而稳定的足弓结构,而足弓结构是通过足底固有肌(PIFMs)的收缩来实现的。特定动作的长期重复负荷会诱发相关肌肉的肥大适应。然而,对于舞者而言,以往研究中有关足底内收肌大小的信息非常有限。本研究的目的是确定舞者和非舞者之间 10 块 PIFM 的大小差异:方法:使用磁共振成像测量了 15 名女性舞蹈演员和 15 名女性非舞蹈演员 10 个 PIFM 的肌肉体积(MV)。分析的肌肉包括:拇外展肌、拇趾屈肌、拇趾小肌、足四头肌、拇外侧肌、拇趾屈肌、拇趾斜头肌、拇趾横头肌、拇趾屈肌、足底/足背骨间肌。除绝对肌张力外,还计算了按体重归一化的相对肌张力(rMVBM)和单个肌张力相对于 10 个 PIFM 肌张力总和的百分比(%MVWHOLE):结果:包括屈指肌和拇阔肌在内的 6 个单个 PIFM 的绝对 MV 值,舞蹈演员比非舞蹈演员大 +16% 至 59%(P ≤ .048)。与非舞者相比,舞者所有单个 PIFM 的 rMVBM 大+35%至 95%(P ≤ .019)。与非舞者相比,舞者的拇屈肌和拇外侧肌的MVWHOLE%高出10%至36%(P≤.014),而拇外侧肌和内收肌斜头的MVWHOLE%低出8%至11%(P≤.037):结论:在所有三项MV测量指标中,只有专门用于屈伸第二至第五跖趾关节的屈指肌和拇趾肌,在舞蹈演员中一直比非舞蹈演员大。这可能是由于在涉及踮脚站立的芭蕾舞训练中,这些腓肠肌受到了长期的重复负荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信