{"title":"Prognostic impact of abdominal aortic calcification in patients who underwent hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.","authors":"Yuto Yamahata, Takeshi Gocho, Kenei Furukawa, Koichiro Haruki, Shinji Onda, Yoshihiro Shirai, Masashi Tsunematsu, Tomohiko Taniai, Mitsuru Yanagaki, Michinori Matsumoto, Ryoga Hamura, Norimitsu Okui, Yoshiaki Tanji, Toru Ikegami","doi":"10.1007/s00595-024-02922-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC), an indicator of systemic arteriosclerosis, is associated with short- and long-term outcomes in malignancies. We investigated the prognostic impact of AAC in patients who underwent hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study cohort comprised 46 patients who underwent hepatectomy for IHCC between January 2008 and September 2020. The AAC volume measured by preoperative computed tomography was used to construct a model of the calcified segment from the renal artery to the common iliac artery bifurcation. We investigated the relationship between AAC and the long-term outcomes. The AAC volume cutoff value was calculated from a receiver-operating characteristic curve based on the three-year survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to our cutoff AAC volume of 3,700 mm<sup>3</sup>, 11 patients (24%) had high AAC volumes. The high-AAC group was significantly older than the low-AAC group (73 vs. 62 years old, p < 0.01). A multivariate analysis of the cancer-specific survival showed that a high serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 concentration (hazard ratio [HR] 5.57, p = 0.01), high AAC volume (HR 3.03, p = 0.04), and [high?] T3 or T4 levels (HR 9.05, p < 0.01) were independently associated with a poor prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AAC is a useful predictor of the oncological prognosis in patients undergoing hepatectomy for IHCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":"544-551"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02922-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC), an indicator of systemic arteriosclerosis, is associated with short- and long-term outcomes in malignancies. We investigated the prognostic impact of AAC in patients who underwent hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC).
Methods: The study cohort comprised 46 patients who underwent hepatectomy for IHCC between January 2008 and September 2020. The AAC volume measured by preoperative computed tomography was used to construct a model of the calcified segment from the renal artery to the common iliac artery bifurcation. We investigated the relationship between AAC and the long-term outcomes. The AAC volume cutoff value was calculated from a receiver-operating characteristic curve based on the three-year survival.
Results: According to our cutoff AAC volume of 3,700 mm3, 11 patients (24%) had high AAC volumes. The high-AAC group was significantly older than the low-AAC group (73 vs. 62 years old, p < 0.01). A multivariate analysis of the cancer-specific survival showed that a high serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 concentration (hazard ratio [HR] 5.57, p = 0.01), high AAC volume (HR 3.03, p = 0.04), and [high?] T3 or T4 levels (HR 9.05, p < 0.01) were independently associated with a poor prognosis.
Conclusion: AAC is a useful predictor of the oncological prognosis in patients undergoing hepatectomy for IHCC.
期刊介绍:
Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it").
The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.