Association between new insertion of a long-term enteral feeding tube and mortality in adults admitted to the hospital with aspiration: A retrospective cohort study

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Anthony D. Bai MD, MSc, Siddhartha Srivastava MD, MSc, Marie Leung MD, Heather Johnson MD, Amol A. Verma MD, MPhil, Fahad Razak MD, MSc
{"title":"Association between new insertion of a long-term enteral feeding tube and mortality in adults admitted to the hospital with aspiration: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Anthony D. Bai MD, MSc,&nbsp;Siddhartha Srivastava MD, MSc,&nbsp;Marie Leung MD,&nbsp;Heather Johnson MD,&nbsp;Amol A. Verma MD, MPhil,&nbsp;Fahad Razak MD, MSc","doi":"10.1002/jpen.2680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to describe the association between insertion of a new long-term enteral feeding tube during admission for aspiration and in-hospital mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective cohort study across 28 Canadian hospitals from 2015 to 2022 included consecutive patients who were admitted for aspiration. Patients were categorized based on new long-term enteral feeding tube insertion during hospital stay or not. The primary outcome was the time to death in hospital. Secondary outcomes included time to discharge alive and hospital readmission for aspiration within 90 days. We used propensity score weighting to balance covariates, and a competing risk model to describe in-hospital death and discharge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 12,850 patients admitted for aspiration, 852 (6.6%) patients received a long-term enteral feeding tube. In the hospital, 184 (21.6%) and 2489 (20.8%) patients in the enteral feeding tube group and no enteral feeding tube group died, respectively. Within 90 days of discharge, 127 (14.9%) and 1148 (9.6%) patients in the enteral feeding tube and no enteral feeding tube group were readmitted for aspiration, respectively. After balancing covariates, an enteral feeding tube was associated with a similar in-hospital mortality risk (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.89–1.23; <i>P</i> = 0.5800), longer time to discharge alive (sHR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.54–0.63; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001), and a higher risk of readmission (risk difference = 5.0%, 95% CI = 2.4%–7.6%; <i>P</i> = 0.0001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Initiation of long-term enteral tube feeding was not uncommon after admission for aspiration and was not associated with an improvement in the probability of being discharged alive from the hospital or readmitted for aspiration.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jpen.2680","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpen.2680","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

We aimed to describe the association between insertion of a new long-term enteral feeding tube during admission for aspiration and in-hospital mortality.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study across 28 Canadian hospitals from 2015 to 2022 included consecutive patients who were admitted for aspiration. Patients were categorized based on new long-term enteral feeding tube insertion during hospital stay or not. The primary outcome was the time to death in hospital. Secondary outcomes included time to discharge alive and hospital readmission for aspiration within 90 days. We used propensity score weighting to balance covariates, and a competing risk model to describe in-hospital death and discharge.

Results

Of 12,850 patients admitted for aspiration, 852 (6.6%) patients received a long-term enteral feeding tube. In the hospital, 184 (21.6%) and 2489 (20.8%) patients in the enteral feeding tube group and no enteral feeding tube group died, respectively. Within 90 days of discharge, 127 (14.9%) and 1148 (9.6%) patients in the enteral feeding tube and no enteral feeding tube group were readmitted for aspiration, respectively. After balancing covariates, an enteral feeding tube was associated with a similar in-hospital mortality risk (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.89–1.23; P = 0.5800), longer time to discharge alive (sHR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.54–0.63; P < 0.0001), and a higher risk of readmission (risk difference = 5.0%, 95% CI = 2.4%–7.6%; P = 0.0001).

Conclusion

Initiation of long-term enteral tube feeding was not uncommon after admission for aspiration and was not associated with an improvement in the probability of being discharged alive from the hospital or readmitted for aspiration.

Abstract Image

新插入长期肠内喂食管与因吸入而入院的成人死亡率之间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景我们旨在描述因吸痰入院期间插入新的长期肠内喂养管与院内死亡率之间的关系:这项回顾性队列研究从 2015 年至 2022 年在加拿大 28 家医院进行,纳入了因吸入而入院的连续患者。根据住院期间是否新插入长期肠内喂养管对患者进行分类。主要结果为住院期间死亡时间。次要结果包括出院时存活时间和 90 天内因吸入而再次入院的时间。我们使用倾向评分加权法平衡协变量,并使用竞争风险模型描述院内死亡和出院情况:在因吸入而入院的12850名患者中,852名(6.6%)患者接受了长期肠内喂养管。在住院期间,肠内喂食管组和无肠内喂食管组分别有 184 名(21.6%)和 2489 名(20.8%)患者死亡。出院后 90 天内,肠内喂养管组和无肠内喂养管组分别有 127 名(14.9%)和 1148 名(9.6%)患者因误吸再次入院。在平衡协变量后,肠内喂养管与相似的院内死亡风险(亚分布危险比 [sHR] = 1.05,95% CI = 0.89-1.23;P = 0.5800)、更长的出院存活时间(sHR = 0.58,95% CI = 0.54-0.63;P 结论:肠内喂养管对患者的死亡风险和出院存活时间具有相关性:因吸痰入院后开始长期肠管喂养的情况并不少见,但这与提高出院后存活的概率或因吸痰再次入院的概率无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信