Short-term Outcome of RPVBT Combined with Chemotherapy for Patients with Single, < 3 cm, T2 Stage Bladder cancer.

IF 3.7 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Zhihua Zhang, Yashen Wang, Fei Luo, Jian Li
{"title":"Short-term Outcome of RPVBT Combined with Chemotherapy for Patients with Single, < 3 cm, T2 Stage Bladder cancer.","authors":"Zhihua Zhang, Yashen Wang, Fei Luo, Jian Li","doi":"10.1186/s12575-024-00253-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the survival outcome of \"radical\" GreenLight photoselective vaporization of bladder tumor (RPVBT) in conjunction with postoperative chemotherapy for patients with single, < 3 cm in diameter, T2 stage muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-eight patients with single, < 3 cm, T2 stage bladder cancer were treated with RPVBT combined with chemotherapy and were included in the RPVBT group. To compare the differences in survival outcome, 80 patients with Ta/T1 bladder cancer and 30 patients with T2 bladder cancer were included as controls. The 80 patients with Ta/T1 bladder cancer underwent GreenLight photoselective vaporization of bladder tumors(PVBT), while 30 patients with T2 bladder cancer underwent radical cystectomy (RC) combined with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Tumor recurrence and death were recorded, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) curves were plotted to compare the survival difference between the RPVBT and control groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in comorbidities or living habits between the RPVBT and control groups. Blood loss [RPVBT: 20 (IQR10, 20) vs. RC: 100 (IQR90, 150) mL] and postoperative hospital stay [RPVBT: 5.5 (IQR5, 6), vs. RC: 10 (IQR8, 12) days] in the RPVBT group were significantly lower than that in the RC group. Urinary tract infection [RPVBT: 6 (15.8%) vs. PVBT: 14 (17.5%)] and bladder irritation sign [RPVBT: 11 (28.9%) vs. PVBT: 23 (28.8%) ] were the most common short-term complications in the RPVBT group, with no statistical difference between the RPVBT and PVBT group. The median follow-up time for survival endpoints was 22 (16, 27) months for the included patients after surgery. The outcomes of tumor recurrence at 12, 24, and 36 months were 2 (5.3%), 3 (7.9%), and 5 (13.2%) patients in the RPVBT groups, 13 (16.3%) and 3 (10%) patients experienced recurrence in the PVBT and RC groups at 36 months. No significant differences were noted among the three groups (P = 0.778). Additionally, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in RFS (P = 0.791) and OS (P = 0.689) among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that RPVBT combined with chemotherapy is a simple and feasible treatment option with fewer complications and satisfactory survival outcomes in patients with single, < 3 cm, T2 stage bladder cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":8960,"journal":{"name":"Biological Procedures Online","volume":"26 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334510/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Procedures Online","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12575-024-00253-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To investigate the survival outcome of "radical" GreenLight photoselective vaporization of bladder tumor (RPVBT) in conjunction with postoperative chemotherapy for patients with single, < 3 cm in diameter, T2 stage muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

Methods: Thirty-eight patients with single, < 3 cm, T2 stage bladder cancer were treated with RPVBT combined with chemotherapy and were included in the RPVBT group. To compare the differences in survival outcome, 80 patients with Ta/T1 bladder cancer and 30 patients with T2 bladder cancer were included as controls. The 80 patients with Ta/T1 bladder cancer underwent GreenLight photoselective vaporization of bladder tumors(PVBT), while 30 patients with T2 bladder cancer underwent radical cystectomy (RC) combined with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Tumor recurrence and death were recorded, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) curves were plotted to compare the survival difference between the RPVBT and control groups.

Results: No significant differences were observed in comorbidities or living habits between the RPVBT and control groups. Blood loss [RPVBT: 20 (IQR10, 20) vs. RC: 100 (IQR90, 150) mL] and postoperative hospital stay [RPVBT: 5.5 (IQR5, 6), vs. RC: 10 (IQR8, 12) days] in the RPVBT group were significantly lower than that in the RC group. Urinary tract infection [RPVBT: 6 (15.8%) vs. PVBT: 14 (17.5%)] and bladder irritation sign [RPVBT: 11 (28.9%) vs. PVBT: 23 (28.8%) ] were the most common short-term complications in the RPVBT group, with no statistical difference between the RPVBT and PVBT group. The median follow-up time for survival endpoints was 22 (16, 27) months for the included patients after surgery. The outcomes of tumor recurrence at 12, 24, and 36 months were 2 (5.3%), 3 (7.9%), and 5 (13.2%) patients in the RPVBT groups, 13 (16.3%) and 3 (10%) patients experienced recurrence in the PVBT and RC groups at 36 months. No significant differences were noted among the three groups (P = 0.778). Additionally, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in RFS (P = 0.791) and OS (P = 0.689) among the three groups.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that RPVBT combined with chemotherapy is a simple and feasible treatment option with fewer complications and satisfactory survival outcomes in patients with single, < 3 cm, T2 stage bladder cancer.

单发、小于 3 厘米、T2 期膀胱癌患者 RPVBT 联合化疗的短期疗效。
背景:研究 "根治性 "绿光光选择性汽化膀胱肿瘤(RPVBT)联合术后化疗对单发膀胱肿瘤患者的生存效果:目的:研究 "根治性 "绿光膀胱肿瘤光选择性汽化术(RPVBT)与术后化疗对单发膀胱肿瘤患者的生存效果:38例单发膀胱肿瘤患者:RPVBT组和对照组在合并症和生活习惯方面无明显差异。RPVBT组的失血量[RPVBT:20(IQR10,20)对RC:100(IQR90,150)毫升]和术后住院时间[RPVBT:5.5(IQR5,6)对RC:10(IQR8,12)天]明显低于RC组。尿路感染[RPVBT:6 (15.8%) vs. PVBT:14 (17.5%)]和膀胱刺激征[RPVBT:11 (28.9%) vs. PVBT:23 (28.8%)]是RPVBT组最常见的短期并发症,RPVBT组与PVBT组之间无统计学差异。所纳入患者术后生存终点的中位随访时间为22(16,27)个月。在12、24和36个月时,RPVBT组分别有2(5.3%)、3(7.9%)和5(13.2%)名患者出现肿瘤复发,PVBT组和RC组分别有13(16.3%)和3(10%)名患者在36个月时出现肿瘤复发。三组之间无明显差异(P = 0.778)。此外,Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,三组患者的RFS(P = 0.791)和OS(P = 0.689)差异无统计学意义:我们的研究结果表明,RPVBT 联合化疗是一种简单可行的治疗方案,并发症较少,对单发患者的生存结果令人满意、
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Procedures Online
Biological Procedures Online 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: iological Procedures Online publishes articles that improve access to techniques and methods in the medical and biological sciences. We are also interested in short but important research discoveries, such as new animal disease models. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: Reports of new research techniques and applications of existing techniques Technical analyses of research techniques and published reports Validity analyses of research methods and approaches to judging the validity of research reports Application of common research methods Reviews of existing techniques Novel/important product information Biological Procedures Online places emphasis on multidisciplinary approaches that integrate methodologies from medicine, biology, chemistry, imaging, engineering, bioinformatics, computer science, and systems analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信