Acceptability and Appropriateness of Patientcentered, Family-focused, Community-oriented (PFC) Lens in the Ortho-Geriatric Fracture Liaison Service among Family and Community Medicine Trainees.

Q4 Medicine
Acta Medica Philippina Pub Date : 2024-07-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.47895/amp.v58i13.8110
Ian Jonathan N Tiotangco, Anna Guia O Limpoco
{"title":"Acceptability and Appropriateness of Patientcentered, Family-focused, Community-oriented (PFC) Lens in the Ortho-Geriatric Fracture Liaison Service among Family and Community Medicine Trainees.","authors":"Ian Jonathan N Tiotangco, Anna Guia O Limpoco","doi":"10.47895/amp.v58i13.8110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Family and Community Medicine (FCM) residency training, the biopsychosocial approach to care was translated to a teaching strategy and cognitive framework called patient-centered, family-focused, and community-oriented (PFC) lens. However, the PFC lens documented in a matrix has no evidence of its implementation acceptability and appropriateness for the users in the FCM training program.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the acceptability and appropriateness of the integration of the PFC lens in the Ortho-Geriatrics Fracture Liaison Service (OG-FLS) in applying the family medicine principles and achieving family practice required competencies of the residents in a tertiary hospital FCM training program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a 15-item self-administered pre-tested online questionnaire to gather feedback and experiences on the PFC lens integration. Answers to open-ended questions were coded and analyzed with MaxQDA and synthesized into themes while numerical rating scales were analyzed with Microsoft Excel into means and standard deviation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen residents answered the questionnaire. There were 47 OG-FLS patients referred to the service. Overall, the acceptability of the approach among FCM residents had an average score of 9.26 (SD ± 0.99) while appropriateness was rated 9.26 (SD ± 1.09) with 10 points as the highest score. The competencies achieved reported by residents were communicating effectively, collaborating with interprofessional teams, demonstrating clinical competence, and practice of biopsychosocial approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PFC lens integration in OG-FLS is acceptable and appropriate in the practice of multidisciplinary care in the in-patient setting among FCM residents. Its integration is aligned with the expected competencies of a family physician that trainees can apply in future practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":6994,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Philippina","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11330993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Philippina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.v58i13.8110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Family and Community Medicine (FCM) residency training, the biopsychosocial approach to care was translated to a teaching strategy and cognitive framework called patient-centered, family-focused, and community-oriented (PFC) lens. However, the PFC lens documented in a matrix has no evidence of its implementation acceptability and appropriateness for the users in the FCM training program.

Objective: To determine the acceptability and appropriateness of the integration of the PFC lens in the Ortho-Geriatrics Fracture Liaison Service (OG-FLS) in applying the family medicine principles and achieving family practice required competencies of the residents in a tertiary hospital FCM training program.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a 15-item self-administered pre-tested online questionnaire to gather feedback and experiences on the PFC lens integration. Answers to open-ended questions were coded and analyzed with MaxQDA and synthesized into themes while numerical rating scales were analyzed with Microsoft Excel into means and standard deviation.

Results: Nineteen residents answered the questionnaire. There were 47 OG-FLS patients referred to the service. Overall, the acceptability of the approach among FCM residents had an average score of 9.26 (SD ± 0.99) while appropriateness was rated 9.26 (SD ± 1.09) with 10 points as the highest score. The competencies achieved reported by residents were communicating effectively, collaborating with interprofessional teams, demonstrating clinical competence, and practice of biopsychosocial approach.

Conclusion: The PFC lens integration in OG-FLS is acceptable and appropriate in the practice of multidisciplinary care in the in-patient setting among FCM residents. Its integration is aligned with the expected competencies of a family physician that trainees can apply in future practice.

以患者为中心、以家庭为重点、以社区为导向(PFC)透镜在家庭和社区医学受训人员骨科-老年骨折联络服务中的可接受性和适宜性。
背景:在家庭与社区医学(FCM)住院医师培训中,生物心理社会护理方法被转化为一种教学策略和认知框架,称为 "以患者为中心、以家庭为重点、以社区为导向"(PFC)透镜。然而,矩阵中记录的 PFC 透视镜并没有证据表明其在实施过程中对家庭医学培训项目用户的可接受性和适宜性:目的:确定在一家三甲医院的全科医学培训项目中,骨科-老年病科骨折联络服务(OG-FLS)在应用全科医学原则和实现住院医师全科实践能力要求时,整合 PFC 镜片的可接受性和适宜性:采用 15 个项目的自填式预试在线问卷进行横向调查,以收集有关 PFC 镜头整合的反馈和经验。用 MaxQDA 对开放式问题的答案进行编码和分析,并归纳成主题,同时用 Microsoft Excel 对数字评分量表进行分析,得出平均值和标准偏差:19 名住院医师回答了问卷。共有 47 名 OG-FLS 患者转诊至该服务。总体而言,外科医生住院医师对该方法的接受度平均得分为 9.26 分(标准差 ± 0.99),适宜度为 9.26 分(标准差 ± 1.09),最高分为 10 分。住院医师汇报的能力包括有效沟通、与跨专业团队合作、展示临床能力和生物心理社会方法实践:PFC镜头整合到OG-FLS中是可以接受的,也是适合中医住院医师在住院环境中进行多学科护理实践的。其整合符合家庭医生的预期能力,学员可在未来的实践中加以应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Medica Philippina
Acta Medica Philippina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信